You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Ukraine Situation - Should We Be Worried?
November 28 2024 1.49am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Ukraine Situation - Should We Be Worried?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 251 of 466 < 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 >

  

Stirlingsays Flag 29 May 22 3.24pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

To become a Nato member requires a country to hold, and commit to continuing to uphold, the common values shared by its members. If Ukraine failed that test, what chance would Russia have?

When Nato's primary reason for existence is to deter Russian aggression, the idea of admitting its main adversary would never be taken seriously and was, almost certainly, just another piece of Putin propaganda designed to wind up the gullible.

This idea that Russians are our European, "Christian", brothers, and ought therefore be regarded as potential partners makes my buttocks wince.

It's nonsense. The only thing that is common is the colour of our skin, and that is totally irrelevant. Their values, morals and, especially, their leadership is diametrically opposed to us. Or at least, to most of us. That a few voice sympathy on here is pretty repugnant, but I don't read it anywhere else.

Even our Churches are distancing themselves from the Russian Orthodox Church on the basis that their defence of Putin cannot be justified by any Christian sect.

I don't doubt Russians could be like us, if they were exposed to, and taught our values for a few generations, but that's true of everyone, whatever their ethnicity. Until they are they aren't our brothers. They are our enemies.

We don't agree on any of these points....but as we have already discussed these I'm not interested in the continual back and forth as you are.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 29 May 22 3.32pm

There was already significant reason to believe that Ukraine was going to be invaded from Belarus anyway. Even aside from that, Putin clearly wanted to reach and take the Capital before he realised that his military strategy wasn't going to pan out as expected due to significant local and global pushback.

The West arming Ukraine at minimum slowed down Russian plans and will persuade them to have more reasonable expectations of what their optional invasion can achieve. Without external help we would not even be in a situation where there was a Ukranian leadership to negotiate anything with. There's much take of Russia needing a buffer. I don't disagree, the West needs one too. It's called Ukraine.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 May 22 6.20pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

It's vital that escalation doesn't happen.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 May 2022 6.33pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 May 22 9.05pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

We don't agree on any of these points....but as we have already discussed these I'm not interested in the continual back and forth as you are.

I don't recall us discussing what the terms of Nato membership are, so would be interested to know what you think they are, and how Russia might meet them.

Nor do I recall us discussing what Nato's primary purpose is, as actually there isn't anything to discuss when it's clearly stated by them, but again if you disagree with that, maybe you can specify why.

Nor have you justified the idea that because Russia is partly in Europe, Russians should be regarded as our "brothers". Whilst most of its people live in the European part, most of its territory is in Asia. Those people are not ethnically the same as those in Western Europe, being Slavic and having many cultural and historical differences. This can be clearly seen in the attitudes now on display. I have witnessed it myself. They aren't like us. They think differently and have different values. They aren't our brothers.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 May 22 9.08pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It's vital that escalation doesn't happen.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 May 2022 6.33pm)

That's true.

It is also vital that appeasement doesn't happen.

Fail with the latter, and you will get the former by default.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 May 22 9.40pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That's true.

It is also vital that appeasement doesn't happen.

Fail with the latter, and you will get the former by default.

Appeasement is just loaded language.

Any peace treaty in history can be seen as appeasement. There is no such thing as a peace deal that everybody is happy about.

It's people using language like that which stops any resolution to the Palestine/Israeli conflict.

Perhaps the Argentinians should have just continued the war over the Falklands because....you know...appeasement.

Was leaving Iraq 'appeasement'?....How about Afghanistan? How about leaving Syria to Assad and Putin? Don't remember the term 'appeasement' then. Why don't we just fecking carry on fighting forever eh.....People are mighty quiet about 'appeasement' when it suits them.

It's the type of language those who would never fight themselves will use to justify sending young men to their deaths.

Perhaps those who aren't sending their own sons into the mincer should shut up about what is and what isn't 'appeasement'.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 May 2022 9.47pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 29 May 22 9.55pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Appeasement is just loaded language.

Any peace treaty in history can be seen as appeasement. There is no such thing as a peace deal that everybody is happy about.

It's people using language like that which stops any resolution to the Palestine/Israeli conflict.

Perhaps the Argentinians should have just continued the war over the Falklands because....you know...appeasement.

Was leaving Iraq 'appeasement'?....How about Afghanistan? How about leaving Syria to Assad and Putin? Don't remember the term 'appeasement' then. Why don't we just fecking carry on fighting forever eh.....People are mighty quiet about 'appeasement' when it suits them.

It's the type of language those who would never fight themselves will use to justify sending young men to their deaths.

Perhaps those who aren't sending their own sons into the mincer should shut up about what is and what isn't 'appeasement'.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 May 2022 9.47pm)

So much is made of “here is the paper…”. It’s
always an excuse for more war and more young dying.

Edited by W12 (29 May 2022 9.59pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 May 22 9.56pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I don't recall us discussing what the terms of Nato membership are, so would be interested to know what you think they are, and how Russia might meet them.

Waffle.....Did Greece meet the rules for joining the EU? Rules are bent and ignored whenever it suits those making the decisions.

I'm tired of listening to b0llocks from waffle merchants.

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Nor do I recall us discussing what Nato's primary purpose is, as actually there isn't anything to discuss when it's clearly stated by them, but again if you disagree with that, maybe you can specify why.

More GCSE level b0llocks that I can't be bothered with.


Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Nor have you justified the idea that because Russia is partly in Europe, Russians should be regarded as our "brothers". Whilst most of its people live in the European part, most of its territory is in Asia. Those people are not ethnically the same as those in Western Europe, being Slavic and having many cultural and historical differences. This can be clearly seen in the attitudes now on display. I have witnessed it myself. They aren't like us. They think differently and have different values. They aren't our brothers.

Why go over what we don't agree on once again? You don't even believe in race....I can't be bothered to discuss these issues with you. It's just rinse and repeat.

I will discuss what I want with people I regard as good faith actors.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 May 22 10.01pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by W12

So much is made of “here is the paper…”. It’s
always an excuse for more ear and more young dying.

In the history of avoidable and stupid wars this one takes the biscuit.

But hey, a lot of arm's industries will sure make a lot of money.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 29 May 22 10.50pm

A timely reminder that the organiser of the American neo-nazi terrorist organisation The Base ( [Link] ) set up the organisation in Russia with their knowledge and publicity behind him. Invitations to government security conference etc too. He must be one of the 'good ones'.

Many examples of their intentions including somes members hopes of using a Virginia rally to spark civil war [Link]

"Here's the thing to, you want to create f***ing some instability, while the Virginia situation is happening, make other things happen, derail some rail lines, f***ing like shut down the highways, oh road block, great lets [sic] shut down the rest of the roads, you know, you can kick off the economic collapse of the U.S. within a week," Mathews allegedly told Lemley on December 21.

Two days later, Lemley allegedly told Mathews, "I literally need, I need to claim my first victim," while discussing targeted acts of violence in Virginia.

"You know we got this situation in Virginia where this is going to be, that opportunity is boundless and the thing is you've got tons of guys who are just in theory should be radicalized enough to know that all you gotta do is start making things go wrong and if Virginia can spiral out to f***ing full blown civil war," Mathews later added."


Maybe W12 can give Vlad a heads up and get him to pop over and arrest the groups founder as part of his neo nazi annulling crusade.

Edited by BlueJay (29 May 2022 10.52pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 May 22 10.57pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Appeasement is just loaded language.

Any peace treaty in history can be seen as appeasement. There is no such thing as a peace deal that everybody is happy about.

It's people using language like that which stops any resolution to the Palestine/Israeli conflict.

Perhaps the Argentinians should have just continued the war over the Falklands because....you know...appeasement.

Was leaving Iraq 'appeasement'?....How about Afghanistan? How about leaving Syria to Assad and Putin? Don't remember the term 'appeasement' then. Why don't we just fecking carry on fighting forever eh.....People are mighty quiet about 'appeasement' when it suits them.

It's the type of language those who would never fight themselves will use to justify sending young men to their deaths.

Perhaps those who aren't sending their own sons into the mincer should shut up about what is and what isn't 'appeasement'.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 May 2022 9.47pm)

Completely untrue. Appeasement means the act of giving the opposing side in an argument or war an advantage that they have demanded, in order to prevent further disagreement.

That's not a peace deal in which two parties reach a mutually agreed settlement. We are likely to end up with a large degree of appeasement in any cessation agreement, but the more damage Ukraine can inflict on the Russians first, the less that will be. That's why they are fighting.

The Palestinian/Israel conflict could never be ended by appeasement. There is nothing either side could offer the other for that to be possible.

The Argentinians surrendered. There was no peace agreement or question of appeasement. You are as confused over that as you are over Iraq and Syria. Afghanistan could be so regarded, but there was no mood in the USA for anything else, so it was more a political imperative than anything else.

Appeasement encourages aggressors. Peace deals, with security guarantees and oversight, discourages them.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 May 22 11.07pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Completely untrue. Appeasement means the act of giving the opposing side in an argument or war an advantage that they have demanded, in order to prevent further disagreement.

That's not a peace deal in which two parties reach a mutually agreed settlement. We are likely to end up with a large degree of appeasement in any cessation agreement, but the more damage Ukraine can inflict on the Russians first, the less that will be. That's why they are fighting.

The Palestinian/Israel conflict could never be ended by appeasement. There is nothing either side could offer the other for that to be possible.

The Argentinians surrendered. There was no peace agreement or question of appeasement. You are as confused over that as you are over Iraq and Syria. Afghanistan could be so regarded, but there was no mood in the USA for anything else, so it was more a political imperative than anything else.

Appeasement encourages aggressors. Peace deals, with security guarantees and oversight, discourages them.

All of this is just sheer word manipulation.

If your balls are as big as the b0llocks you write you'd fly off in orbit around the freaking sun.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 May 2022 11.08pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 251 of 466 < 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Ukraine Situation - Should We Be Worried?