This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 30 Dec 22 10.44pm | |
---|---|
There is no such thing as a pro abortion Catholic. It makes as much sense as an alcoholic Muslim. At best they can be called part cultural. The left just love re-defining categories and diluting because they seek to destroy anything that isn't in their own image. Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Dec 2022 10.46pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 30 Dec 22 11.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Have you ever encountered the type of Catholic this lady appears to be? I have and I can assure you it’s an unusual experience. They are so totally indoctrinated that alternative opinions are met with blank stares of disbelief. They simply cannot comprehend how anyone can disagree with them. If you think Islamic fundamentalists are beyond reason then you will have an idea of the rigidity of these types. I Of course it’s not all Catholics. It’s only a tiny minority. Most are kind, caring people with good hearts. There are a few though who are seriously scarey, especially when it comes to abortion. Sadthetic irrelevance
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 30 Dec 22 11.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
This is one of the more stupid posts you have made, and the competition is stiff Do you think this puerile rubbish contributes to any discussion ? Edited by HKOwen (30 Dec 2022 9.51pm) Come on now. The question has to be asked. Would you? Attachment: 88C8ABDE-5951-446D-91E0-8F9F4E33F3E5.png (365.68Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 31 Dec 22 12.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
There is no such thing as a pro abortion Catholic. It makes as much sense as an alcoholic Muslim. Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Dec 2022 10.46pm) The former is anybody in Sinn Fein. The latter , I saw many of on holiday in the hotel bar of Muslim countries. But it's not a problem cos lots of egalitarian lefties are wealthy & spoilt
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 31 Dec 22 12.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
The former is anybody in Sinn Fein. The latter , I saw many of on holiday in the hotel bar of Muslim countries. But it's not a problem cos lots of egalitarian lefties are wealthy & spoilt There are certainly many who like to stake the claim. Such is life, many pretenders but mostly cultural rather than actual.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 31 Dec 22 3.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Aren’t you eloquent To repeat. It was risible to suggest the police officer have a quiet word with this lady You may not be aware that she effectively forced him to arrest her as she refused to ‘come quietly’. She told us that she has spent 20 years picketing abortion clinics, every week. Why do you think she would stop on this occasion? No matter how kind and polite the Police Officer was. It was she that ‘planted’ the line ‘I may be praying in my head’ so that the media could bay that this was a thought crime. Her backer, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF, formerly Alliance Defense Fund) is an American conservative Christian legal advocacy group that works to curtail rights for LGBTQ people; expand Christian practices within public schools and in government; and outlaw abortion. It certainly appears that this was a pre-scripted stunt to give ADF a boost to its coverage. If he did attempt to have her ‘come quietly’ and she did not, as you have stated, that then entirety dismisses your assertion that my suggesting of this was ‘risible’, as that was actually what happened. As you have also hypothesised and therefore shown an acknowledgment of the probability, I was unaware. I took the story as was presented given I had no intention nor burning desire to iresearch the matter in any great depth. I treat such threads conversationally and not as academic or investigative ventures. I would consider that a healthier approach for somebody in my position however if others approach through a different lens, due to their own circumstances, I can happily accept that. It may well be that whilst presented as a woman arrested for ‘praying in her head’ it is actually the arrest of a well known troublemaker, for lack of articulation, attending an area subject to an order very much designed to prevent the presence of peoples looking to cause problems. As suggested, I think the notion that she very much planned and orchestrated for this to play out in the manner it has, is most likely accurate. Returning to my original point however, the assumed intentions of a person, no matter how likely to be correct, is a very dangerous and precarious position for a police force to take. I would strongly suggest she was arrested on the presumption that her antics, again for lack of articulation, could escalate but also as they were deemed to conflict with the intended protection of this building and its attendees. My view is that she knew she was flirting on the peripheries, if not operating within the grey, of the law here. It’s the manner of the policing and the precedent being set here that I find troubling. For an anecdote, there’s a small cohort of local drug addicts that hang out near the commercial estate not far from me. They have nicked from shops before, they do so on regular occasions no doubt and whilst the membership of that group does see regular churn, the police do not nab them for loitering despite them doing so virtually daily. As to why they were so desperate or quick to arrest this woman, when the aforementioned is just one example of many near on ubiquitous occurrences that go seemingly unresolved by police, is curious if not worrying for me. It is representative, just for me, of their ideological identity superseding their policing one. That is just my subjective interpretation but I suspect a correct one. I’ll thank you for the compliment, which would be great given that was in response to one of many posts I have tapped out, on my phone, without my bins, in my own personal Elba, courtesy of my wife, whilst having a cigarette or two. if it was a sarcastic comment however, I’d recommend perhaps boxing, any other contact sport, weightlifting, or anything to boost testosterone or confidence in one’s own self in general. This will aid the avoidance of presenting oneself so publicly as being insecure to the extent of needing to try and goad other males through an online platform where you are safe from any potential real world, physical consequences. That’s only if it was of course and my advice whilst not absolutely reliable, is only a quick offering for anybody who may find it useful. If in need of serious intervention, I’d consult a physician as a start.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Dec 22 9.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
There is no such thing as a pro abortion Catholic. It makes as much sense as an alcoholic Muslim. At best they can be called part cultural. The left just love re-defining categories and diluting because they seek to destroy anything that isn't in their own image. Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Dec 2022 10.46pm) I don’t know anyone who is pro-abortion. I know many who regard it as a least w orse option in certain circumstances, including lots of Catholics. The kind of lady under discussion would regard such Catholics as CINOs. Catholics in name only. They have an approach to their religion as out of date as are your politics. Which, of course, they are entitled to but what they aren’t is to impose their standards on anyone else. Anymore than you are your politics.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 31 Dec 22 11.11am | |
---|---|
Clearly a mind reader at work as he knows what someone else thinks. Usual risible gibberish
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 31 Dec 22 11.25am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
If he did attempt to have her ‘come quietly’ and she did not, as you have stated, that then entirety dismisses your assertion that my suggesting of this was ‘risible’, as that was actually what happened. As you have also hypothesised and therefore shown an acknowledgment of the probability, I was unaware. I took the story as was presented given I had no intention nor burning desire to iresearch the matter in any great depth. I treat such threads conversationally and not as academic or investigative ventures. I would consider that a healthier approach for somebody in my position however if others approach through a different lens, due to their own circumstances, I can happily accept that. It may well be that whilst presented as a woman arrested for ‘praying in her head’ it is actually the arrest of a well known troublemaker, for lack of articulation, attending an area subject to an order very much designed to prevent the presence of peoples looking to cause problems. As suggested, I think the notion that she very much planned and orchestrated for this to play out in the manner it has, is most likely accurate. Returning to my original point however, the assumed intentions of a person, no matter how likely to be correct, is a very dangerous and precarious position for a police force to take. I would strongly suggest she was arrested on the presumption that her antics, again for lack of articulation, could escalate but also as they were deemed to conflict with the intended protection of this building and its attendees. My view is that she knew she was flirting on the peripheries, if not operating within the grey, of the law here. It’s the manner of the policing and the precedent being set here that I find troubling. For an anecdote, there’s a small cohort of local drug addicts that hang out near the commercial estate not far from me. They have nicked from shops before, they do so on regular occasions no doubt and whilst the membership of that group does see regular churn, the police do not nab them for loitering despite them doing so virtually daily. As to why they were so desperate or quick to arrest this woman, when the aforementioned is just one example of many near on ubiquitous occurrences that go seemingly unresolved by police, is curious if not worrying for me. It is representative, just for me, of their ideological identity superseding their policing one. That is just my subjective interpretation but I suspect a correct one. I’ll thank you for the compliment, which would be great given that was in response to one of many posts I have tapped out, on my phone, without my bins, in my own personal Elba, courtesy of my wife, whilst having a cigarette or two. if it was a sarcastic comment however, I’d recommend perhaps boxing, any other contact sport, weightlifting, or anything to boost testosterone or confidence in one’s own self in general. This will aid the avoidance of presenting oneself so publicly as being insecure to the extent of needing to try and goad other males through an online platform where you are safe from any potential real world, physical consequences. That’s only if it was of course and my advice whilst not absolutely reliable, is only a quick offering for anybody who may find it useful. If in need of serious intervention, I’d consult a physician as a start. OK, this is going to take some responding to. For now, let me say: 1) No, I was not being sarcastic. You are erudite, I find impressively so You should give up cigarettes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 31 Dec 22 11.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Clearly a mind reader at work as he knows what someone else thinks. Usual risible gibberish Don't nick my word
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
berlinpalace berlin 31 Dec 22 11.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You don't know this woman, yet you attack her. Besides it can hardly be said that feminism and neo liberal politics has really helped women. The fact that they are significantly less happy than their fifties counterparts seems to be an inconvenient truth. Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Dec 2022 9.52pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 31 Dec 22 1.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
I like that link
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.