This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Ray in Houston Houston 21 Nov 17 2.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Boys will be boys and girls will be girls and their normal natural behaviour celebrated and encouraged. So what is the natural behavior of the sexes? Is it that men are the aggressors and women are the prey? So thus it shall always be this, and only this, for interaction between the sexes? You call yourself socially libertarian, and yet you want to box everyone in to your preferred stereotypes. I actually don't care how adults choose to interact with each other consensually, as long as they do not stray across the line of legally and/or socially appropriate standards of behavior. This is the nuance that, given multiple untaken opportunities in this thread, you will never understand.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 21 Nov 17 3.08pm | |
---|---|
Here's a saddening article about women who were driven from their chosen profession - at which they were excelling - by sexual harassment. [Link] This is the hidden carnage of sexual harassment; all the unfulfilled potential of the victims and the benefits they could have brought to society that we will never see.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 21 Nov 17 10.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
In the meantime, Roy Moore continues to be supported by conservatives including, notably, Alabama's Governor and the White House. White House Counsel Kellyanne Conway said that it doesn't matter if he's a paedophile because they need his vote in the Senate to get the tax cuts passed. Alabama's Governor went further, saying that she believed Moore's accusers, but thinks that a paedo is better for the Senate than a Democrat. Moore is running neck and neck in the polls with the immaculately credentialed and behaved Doug Jones. Mel Gibson is starring in the #2 movie at the box office. Oh, and self-confessed pussy-grabber and botherer of naked teenagers, Donald Trump, is still President.
Meanwhile, Trump has finally today responded to - instead of pretending not to hear - questions about Roy Moore: Trump: "I can tell you one thing for sure. We don't need a liberal person in there, a Democrat. Jones." Reporter: "Is an accused child molester better than a Democrat?" Trump: "Well, he denies it. Look, he denies it. I mean, if you look at what is really going on. You look at all the things that have happened over the last 48 hours, he totally denies it. He says it didn't happen. And you know, you have to listen to him also."
I'm not sure what's more creepy here: the fact that a childless man was hanging around a high school dance recital, or that he first noticed - in that way - the girl he would later marry when she was 15 or 16 years old (people went back and checked the records).
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Nov 17 10.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Meanwhile, Trump has finally today responded to - instead of pretending not to hear - questions about Roy Moore: Trump: "I can tell you one thing for sure. We don't need a liberal person in there, a Democrat. Jones." Reporter: "Is an accused child molester better than a Democrat?" Trump: "Well, he denies it. Look, he denies it. I mean, if you look at what is really going on. You look at all the things that have happened over the last 48 hours, he totally denies it. He says it didn't happen. And you know, you have to listen to him also."
I'm not sure what's more creepy here: the fact that a childless man was hanging around a high school dance recital, or that he first noticed - in that way - the girl he would later marry when she was 15 or 16 years old (people went back and checked the records).
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 21 Nov 17 10.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Phil the Greek had his eye on our Liz when she was only 13... Exactly. Creepy as f***.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Nov 17 10.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Exactly. Creepy as f***. Still, 70 years married. That's some feat.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 22 Nov 17 12.56am | |
---|---|
Wow, I am humbled to be in the presence of such purity and moral certainty.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 22 Nov 17 4.15am | |
---|---|
Ive always found the solution to sexual harassment claims is twofold.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Nov 17 9.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Wow, I am humbled to be in the presence of such purity and moral certainty. I don't think its moral certainty and purity, to have not sexually harassed or assaulted someone. That's an ethical baseline of reasonable behaviour.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 22 Nov 17 9.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Ive always found the solution to sexual harassment claims is twofold.
Sounds great. How do I get started?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Nov 17 9.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
So what is the natural behavior of the sexes? Is it that men are the aggressors and women are the prey? So thus it shall always be this, and only this, for interaction between the sexes? No one knows, with any real certainty - Those who claim they do, are in denial. Human behaviour is incredibly complicated and diverse, and isn't really tied into a simplistic biological environmental model. The human animal in its natural form, really only manifests I think, when you remove civilisation from the equation. Like most animals our environment defines the most part of our personality and identity, rather than having a isolated self, distinct from the world around us. Human instinct isn't particually definable in a way that is seen even with higher mammals, because the human capacity for learning is monumentally excessive compared even to our closest biological relatives (The human brain has an abnormal level of mirror neurons). We can point to certain instincts (Flight or Fight, grooming, non-verbal communication) and mid-brain impulses (hunger, arousal etc) but these midbrain functions are subordinate to high brain direction (the human brain kind of works with the lower brain being subordinate to the mid brain and the mid brain to the neo-cortex. - As such movement begins with the lower brain, is directed by the mid brain and then the higher brain functions add co-ordination, evaluation and fine motor skills). Because of the huge number of mirror neurons, humans are very much social and environmental creatures, more so than any other species - we're also born with far less specialist brain function. The kind of predictable and pattern behaviour seen even in socialised cats, dogs or chimps isn't remotely similar to human behaviour. We're a paradox of nature, as we define it. We are animals, but we're incredibly complex because we have very developed high brain functions, rather than reliant on specialist mid brain functionality and limited cortex interaction (seen in other mammals).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 22 Nov 17 9.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
No one knows, with any real certainty - Those who claim they do, are in denial. Human behaviour is incredibly complicated and diverse, and isn't really tied into a simplistic biological environmental model. The human animal in its natural form, really only manifests I think, when you remove civilisation from the equation. Like most animals our environment defines the most part of our personality and identity, rather than having a isolated self, distinct from the world around us. Human instinct isn't particually definable in a way that is seen even with higher mammals, because the human capacity for learning is monumentally excessive compared even to our closest biological relatives (The human brain has an abnormal level of mirror neurons). We can point to certain instincts (Flight or Fight, grooming, non-verbal communication) and mid-brain impulses (hunger, arousal etc) but these midbrain functions are subordinate to high brain direction (the human brain kind of works with the lower brain being subordinate to the mid brain and the mid brain to the neo-cortex. - As such movement begins with the lower brain, is directed by the mid brain and then the higher brain functions add co-ordination, evaluation and fine motor skills). Because of the huge number of mirror neurons, humans are very much social and environmental creatures, more so than any other species - we're also born with far less specialist brain function. The kind of predictable and pattern behaviour seen even in socialised cats, dogs or chimps isn't remotely similar to human behaviour. We're a paradox of nature, as we define it. We are animals, but we're incredibly complex because we have very developed high brain functions, rather than reliant on specialist mid brain functionality and limited cortex interaction (seen in other mammals). self censored in case I get whacked.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.