You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sexual Harrassment
November 22 2024 7.24pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Sexual Harrassment

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 25 of 32 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 >

  

Ray in Houston Flag Houston 21 Nov 17 2.56pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Boys will be boys and girls will be girls and their normal natural behaviour celebrated and encouraged.

So what is the natural behavior of the sexes? Is it that men are the aggressors and women are the prey? So thus it shall always be this, and only this, for interaction between the sexes?

You call yourself socially libertarian, and yet you want to box everyone in to your preferred stereotypes. I actually don't care how adults choose to interact with each other consensually, as long as they do not stray across the line of legally and/or socially appropriate standards of behavior.

This is the nuance that, given multiple untaken opportunities in this thread, you will never understand.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 21 Nov 17 3.08pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Here's a saddening article about women who were driven from their chosen profession - at which they were excelling - by sexual harassment. [Link]

This is the hidden carnage of sexual harassment; all the unfulfilled potential of the victims and the benefits they could have brought to society that we will never see.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 21 Nov 17 10.02pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

In the meantime, Roy Moore continues to be supported by conservatives including, notably, Alabama's Governor and the White House. White House Counsel Kellyanne Conway said that it doesn't matter if he's a paedophile because they need his vote in the Senate to get the tax cuts passed. Alabama's Governor went further, saying that she believed Moore's accusers, but thinks that a paedo is better for the Senate than a Democrat. Moore is running neck and neck in the polls with the immaculately credentialed and behaved Doug Jones.

Mel Gibson is starring in the #2 movie at the box office.

Oh, and self-confessed pussy-grabber and botherer of naked teenagers, Donald Trump, is still President.


I did miss off Fox News, whose founder - Roger Ailes, and main star - Bill O'Reilly - were let go from the station after their positions became untenable after the station had to pay out tens of millions in compensation for multiple harassment and discrimination lawsuits. It was actually so bad there that shareholders sued Fox for its complete mishandling of these cases, and won a 90 million dollar settlement from Fox.

Meanwhile, Trump has finally today responded to - instead of pretending not to hear - questions about Roy Moore:

Trump: "I can tell you one thing for sure. We don't need a liberal person in there, a Democrat. Jones."

Reporter: "Is an accused child molester better than a Democrat?"

Trump: "Well, he denies it. Look, he denies it. I mean, if you look at what is really going on. You look at all the things that have happened over the last 48 hours, he totally denies it. He says it didn't happen. And you know, you have to listen to him also."


One man vs. nine accusers, plus multiple contemporaneous corroborations of the accusers, plus further details such as his banning from a mall for bothering the schoolgirls there, a former police officer used to have to keep Moore away from the cheerleaders at high school football games and the bizarre, self-admitted anecdote that his wife first caught his eye at a high school dance recital. Sure, those are totally equal...

I'm not sure what's more creepy here: the fact that a childless man was hanging around a high school dance recital, or that he first noticed - in that way - the girl he would later marry when she was 15 or 16 years old (people went back and checked the records).

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 21 Nov 17 10.42pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


I did miss off Fox News, whose founder - Roger Ailes, and main star - Bill O'Reilly - were let go from the station after their positions became untenable after the station had to pay out tens of millions in compensation for multiple harassment and discrimination lawsuits. It was actually so bad there that shareholders sued Fox for its complete mishandling of these cases, and won a 90 million dollar settlement from Fox.

Meanwhile, Trump has finally today responded to - instead of pretending not to hear - questions about Roy Moore:

Trump: "I can tell you one thing for sure. We don't need a liberal person in there, a Democrat. Jones."

Reporter: "Is an accused child molester better than a Democrat?"

Trump: "Well, he denies it. Look, he denies it. I mean, if you look at what is really going on. You look at all the things that have happened over the last 48 hours, he totally denies it. He says it didn't happen. And you know, you have to listen to him also."


One man vs. nine accusers, plus multiple contemporaneous corroborations of the accusers, plus further details such as his banning from a mall for bothering the schoolgirls there, a former police officer used to have to keep Moore away from the cheerleaders at high school football games and the bizarre, self-admitted anecdote that his wife first caught his eye at a high school dance recital. Sure, those are totally equal...

I'm not sure what's more creepy here: the fact that a childless man was hanging around a high school dance recital, or that he first noticed - in that way - the girl he would later marry when she was 15 or 16 years old (people went back and checked the records).


Phil the Greek had his eye on our Liz when she was only 13...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 21 Nov 17 10.49pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Phil the Greek had his eye on our Liz when she was only 13...

Exactly. Creepy as f***.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 21 Nov 17 10.56pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

Exactly. Creepy as f***.

Still, 70 years married. That's some feat.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 22 Nov 17 12.56am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Wow, I am humbled to be in the presence of such purity and moral certainty.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dreamwaverider Flag London 22 Nov 17 4.15am Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider Add dreamwaverider as a friend

Ive always found the solution to sexual harassment claims is twofold.
Either pull a much older lady(I had an 82 year old last week). They normally don't complain but if they do you can always cry dementia.
The other way if you are shooting younger is get a witness. This allows for threesomes both ways, voyeurism or whatever tickles your fancy and probably eliminates any harassment claims.
I'm sure either sex could try this safety aspect including trans genders gays etc.
THe options are endless and can have harassment claims eliminated if considered carefully.


Edited by dreamwaverider (22 Nov 2017 4.20am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Nov 17 9.26am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Wow, I am humbled to be in the presence of such purity and moral certainty.

I don't think its moral certainty and purity, to have not sexually harassed or assaulted someone. That's an ethical baseline of reasonable behaviour.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 22 Nov 17 9.33am Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by dreamwaverider

Ive always found the solution to sexual harassment claims is twofold.
Either pull a much older lady(I had an 82 year old last week). They normally don't complain but if they do you can always cry dementia.
The other way if you are shooting younger is get a witness. This allows for threesomes both ways, voyeurism or whatever tickles your fancy and probably eliminates any harassment claims.
I'm sure either sex could try this safety aspect including trans genders gays etc.
THe options are endless and can have harassment claims eliminated if considered carefully.


Edited by dreamwaverider (22 Nov 2017 4.20am)

Sounds great.

How do I get started?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Nov 17 9.38am

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

So what is the natural behavior of the sexes? Is it that men are the aggressors and women are the prey? So thus it shall always be this, and only this, for interaction between the sexes?

No one knows, with any real certainty - Those who claim they do, are in denial. Human behaviour is incredibly complicated and diverse, and isn't really tied into a simplistic biological environmental model.

The human animal in its natural form, really only manifests I think, when you remove civilisation from the equation. Like most animals our environment defines the most part of our personality and identity, rather than having a isolated self, distinct from the world around us.

Human instinct isn't particually definable in a way that is seen even with higher mammals, because the human capacity for learning is monumentally excessive compared even to our closest biological relatives (The human brain has an abnormal level of mirror neurons).

We can point to certain instincts (Flight or Fight, grooming, non-verbal communication) and mid-brain impulses (hunger, arousal etc) but these midbrain functions are subordinate to high brain direction (the human brain kind of works with the lower brain being subordinate to the mid brain and the mid brain to the neo-cortex. - As such movement begins with the lower brain, is directed by the mid brain and then the higher brain functions add co-ordination, evaluation and fine motor skills).

Because of the huge number of mirror neurons, humans are very much social and environmental creatures, more so than any other species - we're also born with far less specialist brain function. The kind of predictable and pattern behaviour seen even in socialised cats, dogs or chimps isn't remotely similar to human behaviour.

We're a paradox of nature, as we define it. We are animals, but we're incredibly complex because we have very developed high brain functions, rather than reliant on specialist mid brain functionality and limited cortex interaction (seen in other mammals).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 22 Nov 17 9.51am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

No one knows, with any real certainty - Those who claim they do, are in denial. Human behaviour is incredibly complicated and diverse, and isn't really tied into a simplistic biological environmental model.

The human animal in its natural form, really only manifests I think, when you remove civilisation from the equation. Like most animals our environment defines the most part of our personality and identity, rather than having a isolated self, distinct from the world around us.

Human instinct isn't particually definable in a way that is seen even with higher mammals, because the human capacity for learning is monumentally excessive compared even to our closest biological relatives (The human brain has an abnormal level of mirror neurons).

We can point to certain instincts (Flight or Fight, grooming, non-verbal communication) and mid-brain impulses (hunger, arousal etc) but these midbrain functions are subordinate to high brain direction (the human brain kind of works with the lower brain being subordinate to the mid brain and the mid brain to the neo-cortex. - As such movement begins with the lower brain, is directed by the mid brain and then the higher brain functions add co-ordination, evaluation and fine motor skills).

Because of the huge number of mirror neurons, humans are very much social and environmental creatures, more so than any other species - we're also born with far less specialist brain function. The kind of predictable and pattern behaviour seen even in socialised cats, dogs or chimps isn't remotely similar to human behaviour.

We're a paradox of nature, as we define it. We are animals, but we're incredibly complex because we have very developed high brain functions, rather than reliant on specialist mid brain functionality and limited cortex interaction (seen in other mammals).

self censored in case I get whacked.


Edited by hedgehog50 (22 Nov 2017 9.52am)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 25 of 32 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sexual Harrassment