You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn
November 23 2024 3.08am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Jeremy Corbyn

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 25 of 464 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 >

  

leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 14 Aug 15 7.40pm

Quote legaleagle at 14 Aug 2015 7.21pm

Glad to hear you are not biased towards failings on the left in any way as opposed towards similar failings on the right.

Am presently reviewing the effects of lack of immigration controls on the extinction of homo neanderthalens.

Did have a thought actually. Could it be possible a few homo neanderthalens remain even now,having survived the onset of "modern man", 40,000 years after they were thought to have become completely extinct?

Why bring TUSC into this? Still awaiting from you why you think there should be any immigration controls and what the problems are that such controls are needed for.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 14 Aug 15 8.09pm

Neanderthals had (have) tusks?

Well, the main reason immigration controls are needed is to ensure we keep out any people of a different race,religion or ethnicity to us ,isn't it? Or did you think that Derben bloke was some kind of bonkers neanderthal?

Edited by legaleagle (14 Aug 2015 8.13pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 14 Aug 15 8.20pm

Quote legaleagle at 14 Aug 2015 8.09pm

Neanderthals had (have) tusks?

Well, the main reason immigration controls are needed is to ensure we keep out any people of a different race,religion or ethnicity to us ,isn't it? Or did you think that Derben bloke was some kind of bonkers neanderthal?

Edited by legaleagle (14 Aug 2015 8.13pm)

As usual you avoid answering very simple questions. If must be difficult for you to maintain the double-think that we need immigration controls but that there are no drawbacks to immigration. Come on, have the courage of what passes for your convictions and tell us why you think there should be immigration controls at all and what are the problems that such controls would address.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 14 Aug 15 8.25pm

I answered your question.Don't you agree? Surely you don't think that Derben bloke was a bonkers neanderthal?

Now who's avoiding answering simple questions?

Edited by legaleagle (14 Aug 2015 8.30pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 14 Aug 15 8.35pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 14 Aug 2015 8.20pm

Quote legaleagle at 14 Aug 2015 8.09pm

Neanderthals had (have) tusks?

Well, the main reason immigration controls are needed is to ensure we keep out any people of a different race,religion or ethnicity to us ,isn't it? Or did you think that Derben bloke was some kind of bonkers neanderthal?

Edited by legaleagle (14 Aug 2015 8.13pm)

As usual you avoid answering very simple questions. If must be difficult for you to maintain the double-think that we need immigration controls but that there are no drawbacks to immigration. Come on, have the courage of what passes for your convictions and tell us why you think there should be immigration controls at all and what are the problems that such controls would address.

Can we keep the oft repeated questions about hypothetical immigration policies or lack of to the Calais or immigrants thread please. I'm getting confused it's all starting to look the same in every thread.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 14 Aug 15 8.37pm

Fair point.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 14 Aug 15 8.44pm

Well of course you don't want the questions asked. It highlights your impossible position. You say there should be immigration controls because you know it is ridiculous to say otherwise. Yet for politically correct reasons you cannot say why we need the controls because the true answers would contradict your dogma that immigration is an unmitigated blessing - you would have to admit that immigration causes problems, the very problems that you endlessly argue against on this forum.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Catfish Flag Burgess Hill 14 Aug 15 8.57pm

I have a serious point to make on this thread.

I have heard a rumour that the Labour Party has been infiltrated by socialists.

 


Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Catfish Flag Burgess Hill 14 Aug 15 9.37pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 14 Aug 2015 2.49pm

Nick earlier on you asked why Corbyn is being criticised for promoting 1970's style policies.

Surely even you can see that it's a throwback to recommend re-nationalising the railways and energy companies without outlining the financial details of how we could afford it?

Similarly he has suggested re-opening the South wales coal mines to reduce unemployment whilst also promoting greener energy production?

That smacks of 1970's style politics to me.


This is so nostalgic. I remember Union conferences back in the 80s where the young comrades would get an automatic ripple of applause for demanding that we needed more factories and mines. Like they would ever work in one or let their nice middle class children work in one. They would spout this stuff while dropping their H's to hide their guilt at having a 2:2 in sociology from Kingston Poly.
Corbyn IS one of those Union reps all grown up. Those are the people he has always associated with in a nice pointless political career having responsibility for nothing, never having to make a difficult administrative decision or having to sully himself with real work.

 


Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 14 Aug 15 9.59pm

Quote Catfish at 14 Aug 2015 9.37pm


This is so nostalgic. I remember Union conferences back in the 80s where the young comrades would get an automatic ripple of applause for demanding that we needed more factories and mines. Like they would ever work in one or let their nice middle class children work in one. They would spout this stuff while dropping their H's to hide their guilt at having a 2:2 in sociology from Kingston Poly.
Corbyn IS one of those Union reps all grown up. Those are the people he has always associated with in a nice pointless political career having responsibility for nothing, never having to make a difficult administrative decision or having to sully himself with real work.


Yup,lets focus on the absolute key issues rather than policies..I mean David Cameron and George Osborne had loads of experience of "real work", didn't they?

Funnily enough Corbyn's main mentor was Dennis Skinner,who funnily enough...had um worked down a mine for 13 years.

Who couldn't reminisce for the good old days of the eighties style governance when people really knew what they were doing by introducing the loosening of regulatory controls on banks and financial services that have been seen to have so benefited us in recent times.

Not to mention the virtual abolition of rent controls that have been seen to have in no way have helped cause extra homelessness, housing problems and difficulties of young people getting on the housing ladder down the line today.

Thank goodness the good old eighties gave us such a uniformly good legacy.Definitely something to get right rosy and nostalgic about.

Edited by legaleagle (14 Aug 2015 10.02pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 14 Aug 15 10.06pm

Quote legaleagle at 14 Aug 2015 9.59pm

Quote Catfish at 14 Aug 2015 9.37pm


This is so nostalgic. I remember Union conferences back in the 80s where the young comrades would get an automatic ripple of applause for demanding that we needed more factories and mines. Like they would ever work in one or let their nice middle class children work in one. They would spout this stuff while dropping their H's to hide their guilt at having a 2:2 in sociology from Kingston Poly.
Corbyn IS one of those Union reps all grown up. Those are the people he has always associated with in a nice pointless political career having responsibility for nothing, never having to make a difficult administrative decision or having to sully himself with real work.


Yup,lets focus on the absolute key issues rather than policies..I mean David Cameron and George Osborne had loads of experience of "real work", didn't they?

Funnily enough Corbyn's main mentor was Dennis Skinner,who funnily enough...had um worked down a mine for 13 years.

Who couldn't reminisce for the good old days of the eighties style governance when people really knew what they were doing by introducing the loosening of regulatory controls on banks and financial services that have been seen to have so benefited us in recent times.

Not to mention the virtual abolition of rent controls that have been seen to have in no way have helped cause extra homelessness, housing problems and difficulties of young people getting on the housing ladder down the line today.

Thank goodness the good old eighties gave us such a uniformly good legacy.Definitely something to get right rosy and nostalgic about.

Edited by legaleagle (14 Aug 2015 10.02pm)

Don't forget New Romantics- the 80's was good for them.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 14 Aug 15 10.20pm

Interesting YouGov survey last year indicating (shock horror) more "real people" in "real jobs" support reducing inequality than don't, even it meant less "overall" wealth.

Of course "ordinary" people like that couldn't possibly be attracted to some of Corbyn's policies,could they? After all,they are all such a minute part of the overall population and,as we all know,only middle-class sociology lecturers and the like could support those kinds of things

"56% would like to to see a more equal distribution, even if it reduces the total amount of wealth, and only 17% would choose greater overall wealth even if it leads to greater inequality.

Conservatives are the only demographic who do not favour equality by a majority, but even then they are almost split (33% equality, 39% wealth)"

Edited by legaleagle (14 Aug 2015 10.22pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 25 of 464 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Corbyn