The Greens

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Greens

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 25 of 34 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 >

matt_himself Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.01pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

I will defend the greens education policies.
There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids.
Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability.
Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it.
Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago.

BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in.

You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin.

With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite?

Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster)

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.13pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.22pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.27pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. Was just reiterating what I'd said in an earlier post. You should learn to take my word for things... Slightly dated [Link] but this shows that teachers are in the top 5 most trusted professionals. You should listen more rather than dismissing. Why would I lie anyway? Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

Was just reiterating what I'd said in an earlier post. You should learn to take my word for things...
Slightly dated [Link] but this shows that teachers are in the top 5 most trusted professionals. You should listen more rather than dismissing. Why would I lie anyway?

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.34pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.27pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. Was just reiterating what I'd said in an earlier post. You should learn to take my word for things... Slightly dated [Link] but this shows that teachers are in the top 5 most trusted professionals. You should listen more rather than dismissing. Why would I lie anyway? Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm) Oh please. You are preaching violent revolution. You want to achieve your political aims via manipulation of facts and the cheap lambasting of opponents as 'cunds'. Why would you lie? "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm)

Oh please. You are preaching violent revolution. You want to achieve your political aims via manipulation of facts and the cheap lambasting of opponents as 'cunds'. Why would you lie?

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.35pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.34pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.27pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. Was just reiterating what I'd said in an earlier post. You should learn to take my word for things... Slightly dated [Link] but this shows that teachers are in the top 5 most trusted professionals. You should listen more rather than dismissing. Why would I lie anyway? Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm) Oh please. You are preaching violent revolution. You want to achieve your political aims via manipulation of facts and the cheap lambasting of opponents as 'cunds'. Why would you lie? hmm. Show me and the lovely folk on the HOL where I have preached violent revolution? Anti capitalism is on the rise - look at Greece was that a violent revolution? Look at the surge in support for the anti-austerity Greens. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.37pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.35pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm)

Oh please. You are preaching violent revolution. You want to achieve your political aims via manipulation of facts and the cheap lambasting of opponents as 'cunds'. Why would you lie?

hmm. Show me and the lovely folk on the HOL where I have preached violent revolution?

Anti capitalism is on the rise - look at Greece was that a violent revolution? Look at the surge in support for the anti-austerity Greens.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.37pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.47pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.35pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.34pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.27pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. Was just reiterating what I'd said in an earlier post. You should learn to take my word for things... Slightly dated [Link] but this shows that teachers are in the top 5 most trusted professionals. You should listen more rather than dismissing. Why would I lie anyway? Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm) Oh please. You are preaching violent revolution. You want to achieve your political aims via manipulation of facts and the cheap lambasting of opponents as 'cunds'. Why would you lie? hmm. Show me and the lovely folk on the HOL where I have preached violent revolution? Anti capitalism is on the rise - look at Greece was that a violent revolution? Look at the surge in support for the anti-austerity Greens. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.37pm) Tell me, how else, other than by violent uprising, will revolution be achieved? Do you honestly honk that at sometime everyone will think, I don't need a home, electricity,hot water or an iPad and I will peacefully give these things up so I can be told what to do by a know it all and embittered middle class hippie playing Che Guevara? BTW, who did the lefties partner with in Greece? Edited by matt_himself (29 Jan 2015 10.47pm) "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 29 Jan 15 10.47pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.35pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.27pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.27pm)

Oh please. You are preaching violent revolution. You want to achieve your political aims via manipulation of facts and the cheap lambasting of opponents as 'cunds'. Why would you lie?

hmm. Show me and the lovely folk on the HOL where I have preached violent revolution?

Anti capitalism is on the rise - look at Greece was that a violent revolution? Look at the surge in support for the anti-austerity Greens.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.37pm)

Tell me, how else, other than by violent uprising, will revolution be achieved? Do you honestly honk that at sometime everyone will think, I don't need a home, electricity,hot water or an iPad and I will peacefully give these things up so I can be told what to do by a know it all and embittered middle class hippie playing Che Guevara?

BTW, who did the lefties partner with in Greece?

Edited by matt_himself (29 Jan 2015 10.47pm)

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.58pm
Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 10.58pm

Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 29 Jan 15 11.04pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark. I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims? "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 29 Jan 15 11.04pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm

Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark.

I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims?

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 11.07pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.04pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark. I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims? So you do retract! I'm asking you again. Where have I preached violent revolution. You are spreading lies Matt.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 11.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.04pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm

Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark.

I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims?

So you do retract!
I'm asking you again. Where have I preached violent revolution. You are spreading lies Matt.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 29 Jan 15 11.11pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 11.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.04pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark. I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims? So you do retract! I'm asking you again. Where have I preached violent revolution. You are spreading lies Matt. The fact is you are a Trot. Trot's want violent revolution. Therefore, you want violent revolution. You want 'cunds' to pay. It is in-bedded in your psyche. Deal with it. I am not spreading lies. You are trying to deflect from a fundamental pivot of your ideology. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 29 Jan 15 11.11pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 11.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.04pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm

Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark.

I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims?

So you do retract!
I'm asking you again. Where have I preached violent revolution. You are spreading lies Matt.

The fact is you are a Trot. Trot's want violent revolution.

Therefore, you want violent revolution. You want 'cunds' to pay. It is in-bedded in your psyche. Deal with it.

I am not spreading lies. You are trying to deflect from a fundamental pivot of your ideology.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 11.19pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.11pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 11.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.04pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark. I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims? So you do retract! I'm asking you again. Where have I preached violent revolution. You are spreading lies Matt. The fact is you are a Trot. Trot's want violent revolution. Therefore, you want violent revolution. You want 'cunds' to pay. It is in-bedded in your psyche. Deal with it. I am not spreading lies. You are trying to deflect from a fundamental pivot of your ideology. For the last time. Show everyone where I have preached violent revolution. Also, added to that show everyone where I have said I am a Trot. Also it's either ingrained or embedded for future reference.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 29 Jan 15 11.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.11pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 11.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 11.04pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.58pm

Show me where I have preached violent revolution or else retract your remark.

I don't retract nothing. How else are you going to achieve your aims?

So you do retract!
I'm asking you again. Where have I preached violent revolution. You are spreading lies Matt.

The fact is you are a Trot. Trot's want violent revolution.

Therefore, you want violent revolution. You want 'cunds' to pay. It is in-bedded in your psyche. Deal with it.

I am not spreading lies. You are trying to deflect from a fundamental pivot of your ideology.

For the last time. Show everyone where I have preached violent revolution. Also, added to that show everyone where I have said I am a Trot.

Also it's either ingrained or embedded for future reference.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 25 of 34 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Greens

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors