This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Spiderman Horsham 30 Nov 20 8.25am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What has that got to do with this thread? Tbf you have brought the name Trump into several threads, including at least one on transfer talk!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 30 Nov 20 8.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
Employees at Orlando Disney, refer to the place as Mousewitz such is how poorly they treat their staff. They were warned off from using that name and apparently started calling it Duckhau.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Nov 20 10.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Weren't you complaining about posters acting as forum policeman? Threads have natural variation. Anyone who knows about Murdoch now understand that his son James involves himself far more politically than his father does...due to age and James is less socially conservative and more of a pragmatist. I think the idea that Murdoch controls Disney politically almost amusing....it's pretty simple, just look at who sits on their board of directors. As for Fox: (pasted from Wikipedia) Fox is being slowly positioned towards the Republican centre. I think they have made a poor call on the direction of the party post Trump but they and we shall find out. Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Nov 2020 4.50am) I have no interest in, or intention to even offer a comment about, the subjects to be discussed. All that was done here was to point out factually incorrect claims that weren't spotted by others but built upon by them. Discussing the way that Fox appears to be distancing itself from Trump seems a perfectly valid area for discussion to me. Making false claims about it's ownership and then attributing the motivation for that distancing to that falsehood does not seem valid. Seeking to deliberately confuse or conflate the two isn't valid either. It seems to me that you remain confused over this:- "I think the idea that Murdoch controls Disney politically almost amusing." Where do you get that idea from? Murdoch is not involved with Disney. He sold part of his business to them in a restructuring but retained Fox News, in which Disney has no interest on involvement at all.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Nov 20 11.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Tbf you have brought the name Trump into several threads, including at least one on transfer talk! Not really a genuine comparison is it? This was a factually incorrect statement. Me expressing opinions about Trump and his impact on many aspects of our lives is merely just that. Opinions. You not liking those opinions is fine. Facts are not involved.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 30 Nov 20 11.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not really a genuine comparison is it? This was a factually incorrect statement. Me expressing opinions about Trump and his impact on many aspects of our lives is merely just that. Opinions. You not liking those opinions is fine. Facts are not involved. Nothing to do with your opinions. You criticised the poster for bringing up a topic, you did not feel was relevant to this thread. I just pointed out that you have done similar, unless you know of any reason Trump is relevant to our transfer thread
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 30 Nov 20 12.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have no interest in, or intention to even offer a comment about, the subjects to be discussed. All that was done here was to point out factually incorrect claims that weren't spotted by others but built upon by them. Discussing the way that Fox appears to be distancing itself from Trump seems a perfectly valid area for discussion to me. Making false claims about it's ownership and then attributing the motivation for that distancing to that falsehood does not seem valid. Seeking to deliberately confuse or conflate the two isn't valid either. It seems to me that you remain confused over this:- "I think the idea that Murdoch controls Disney politically almost amusing." Where do you get that idea from? Murdoch is not involved with Disney. He sold part of his business to them in a restructuring but retained Fox News, in which Disney has no interest on involvement at all. I'm not confused about anything. It seems to me that you wish to misrepresent the statements of others and then claim that you are correcting them. Just like you waffled over your hypocrisy on forum policing this is just a daily activity for you.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Nov 20 12.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Nothing to do with your opinions. You criticised the poster for bringing up a topic, you did not feel was relevant to this thread. I just pointed out that you have done similar, unless you know of any reason Trump is relevant to our transfer thread I suggest you read it again. The topic existed. I started it! The thing that was criticised was the incorrect assertion that Fox is now owned by Disney, which was picked up and continued by others. After I had pointed that mistake out the references to Disney continued. That wasn't just bringing up a new topic which has zilch connection to the US election! It was continuing to push a connection that doesn't exist and which had been pointed out.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Nov 20 1.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I'm not confused about anything. It seems to me that you wish to misrepresent the statements of others and then claim that you are correcting them. Just like you waffled over your hypocrisy on forum policing this is just a daily activity for you. Which bit of this quote do you deny making? "Media becomes the mouthpiece of whoever owns it and Fox started dying in terms of conservatism the day Disney took over." Or am I misrepresenting it? To repeat, Disney does not own Fox News. Murdoch has retained it. Any changes to it's treatment of Trump, or indeed it's attitudes to "conservatism", are not therefore as a consequence of any change of ownership, to Disney or anyone else.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 30 Nov 20 1.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I suggest you read it again. The topic existed. I started it! The thing that was criticised was the incorrect assertion that Fox is now owned by Disney, which was picked up and continued by others. After I had pointed that mistake out the references to Disney continued. That wasn't just bringing up a new topic which has zilch connection to the US election! It was continuing to push a connection that doesn't exist and which had been pointed out. There was a couple of posts criticising Disney, you responded by “ what has this got to do with the thread ?” So I asked what relevance Trump has to any of our transfer threads? You mentioned him in them so presumably you have an answer
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 30 Nov 20 1.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Which bit of this quote do you deny making? "Media becomes the mouthpiece of whoever owns it and Fox started dying in terms of conservatism the day Disney took over." Or am I misrepresenting it? To repeat, Disney does not own Fox News. Murdoch has retained it. Any changes to it's treatment of Trump, or indeed it's attitudes to "conservatism", are not therefore as a consequence of any change of ownership, to Disney or anyone else.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 30 Nov 20 1.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Which bit of this quote do you deny making? "Media becomes the mouthpiece of whoever owns it and Fox started dying in terms of conservatism the day Disney took over." Or am I misrepresenting it? To repeat, Disney does not own Fox News. Murdoch has retained it. Any changes to it's treatment of Trump, or indeed it's attitudes to "conservatism", are not therefore as a consequence of any change of ownership, to Disney or anyone else. No, in this aspect you aren't wrong. However, as a general observation of your modus operandi I'd say I'm pretty accurate.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Nov 20 1.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle
No, because I don't. I do loads of other things. I am about to go shopping and will be walking the dog on a beach where he will doubtless swim first. I may cast a line for 30 mins too, just to see if there are any bass around. I am just able to type very quickly.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.