She was but in someways, at least at the time, she seemed the right choice. A compromise meant to allay the fears of the Remainers.

At the time, there was zero talk about a second referendum and the assumption was that Parliament would do what it had just been told to do. Even calling the 2017 election made sense given the polling. Plenty of 9pm Analysts out there to decry that now but the data available spoke of her winning a bigger majority. I get why her team pushed her to take the plunge.

Plenty to criticize in how the campaign was subsequently handled along with a warning for the Tories today because Labour did propose a substantially 'socialist' manifesto and did bloody well on the back of a pledge to honour the Brexit vote. That is what I fail to grasp about the people who pushed for their second referendum stance in 2019. That was suicidal for them.

May simply was not the right person for the job. Probably never was but that does come with a huge dollop of hindsight.

And gets us where we are now with perhaps the combination of her unsuitability allied with Ms Gina Millers interference meaning we are more likely to get the Brexit people like me wanted.

Strange how life works out.

Your heroes really do speak volumes.

Do you Left wing dullards all use the same book for your one liners?

You could be slightly imaginative on occasionally just for a change.

There is a big difference between someone's personal opinion being presented as fact and a reported conversation. Especially when it was with a senior serving military officer.

left wing dullards: Mark Carney, Dominic Grieve, Michael Heseltine, Kenneth Clark, IMF, WTO, Tony Blair, John Major, Teresa May, Rory Stewart, and which left wing dullard was a prime mover in the establishment of the single market? Margaret Thatcher. Snow flake woke up arse liberals the lot of them

And as I have already stated unless you were also there that's impossible. If anyone else "reported facts" and gave where and from whom they heard them then I would never challenge them because to do so would insult their integrity, as you appear to be doing to mine.

All I have ever done is challenge unsupported assertions that appear to have come out of thin air and be simply opinion. Provide some evidence in support and I would be satisfied. I might disagree with the conclusion, but that's different.