This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 01 Oct 16 10.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
I hope you don't get too many doors slammed in your face! Have fun. Not many doors on a street stall.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 01 Oct 16 10.25am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Not many doors on a street stall. You mean a Barrow....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 01 Oct 16 10.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
You mean a Barrow.... A neolithic burial chamber?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 01 Oct 16 10.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
A neolithic burial chamber? Not a long barrow The sort of barrow you have in a market selling fruit etc.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
banbandanas Birmingham 01 Oct 16 10.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
A neolithic burial chamber? Why bring Corbyn's plans for the country's defence into this?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 01 Oct 16 11.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
I hope you don't get too many doors slammed in your face! Have fun. I was reading a spat on Twitter between some "traditional" Labour Party members and members of momentum. Essentially Momentum don't believe in archaic knocking in doors. It's all about social media. When challenged about how they will learn what the public thinks, the response was that they don't care. I have followed the split on Labour quite closely over the the last few months. A lot of my friends have voted Labour all their life but they really aren't sure whether they still belong in the party. Nick, what is a "have not"? Genuine question, there's plenty that we could all claim not to have. The poor have been improving every year since 2009 according to the Institute of Fiscal studies. Not as quickly as the rich BUT there is an element of logic to that
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 01 Oct 16 12.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
I was reading a spat on Twitter between some "traditional" Labour Party members and members of momentum. Essentially Momentum don't believe in archaic knocking in doors. It's all about social media. When challenged about how they will learn what the public thinks, the response was that they don't care. I have followed the split on Labour quite closely over the the last few months. A lot of my friends have voted Labour all their life but they really aren't sure whether they still belong in the party. Nick, what is a "have not"? Genuine question, there's plenty that we could all claim not to have. The poor have been improving every year since 2009 according to the Institute of Fiscal studies. Not as quickly as the rich BUT there is an element of logic to that 1. Plenty of positive responses from the good people of Eltham as well as a couple of 'As soon as we get those f***ing East Europeans out everything will be alright' type responses. 2. Have nots could be described as those who work hard but still struggle to pay bills / feed the family.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 01 Oct 16 2.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
1. Plenty of positive responses from the good people of Eltham as well as a couple of 'As soon as we get those f***ing East Europeans out everything will be alright' type responses. 2. Have nots could be described as those who work hard but still struggle to pay bills / feed the family. Well it was Eltham! What was the opinion about Corbyn? What about the have nots who don't work? I think that this is where the left / centre / right probably disagree most. What is your take on it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OldFella London 01 Oct 16 2.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Expand on your classic boy who cried wolf please. I'm not sure you are using the correct analogy (that's using something similar to highlight what it is your getting at if it's too complicated a word.) BTW FYI: Ad Hominem The word is "you're". Just saying
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 01 Oct 16 2.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by OldFella
The word is "you're". Just saying If grammar written on a predictive text phone is the only argument you have..?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OldFella London 01 Oct 16 2.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
If grammar written on a predictive text phone is the only argument you have..?
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OldFella London 01 Oct 16 2.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
If grammar written on a predictive text phone is the only argument you have..? The chap who invented predictive text died last week - his funfair is next monkey I'll get my coat...
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.