[Link]

You never did answer me DanH.
Would you rather live next to 1000 people from either
1. Kingston Jamaica
Or
2. Cowes Isle of white

This can only be answered by someone who has been to both Kingston and Cowes.

Narrows the potential number of respondents.

and it's Isle of Wight ( please don't pretend you were having a play on words ).

Edited by HKOwen (29 May 2021 9.47am)

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Exactly.

When you look at the responses given on the thread, all they have is name calling.

What they call, 'far right' was just the 'right' when I was growing up. What was once on the left is considered the centre and the 'far left' is now just the left (though the Tories have stolen some of their social policies).

They want to scare Europeans from standing up for their ancestral rights, but would think nothing of saying blacks have the right to be the majority in Africa, for example.

They want to call you an extremist if you even dare to say that making the native British a minority in their own country is fundamentally wrong. Many countries outside of Europe have laws that ensure this doesn't happen....Israel for example. As stated even the Dalai Lama could see that this principle of allowing a native population to become a minority in their own land wasn't right.

Some of them want to shout about racism but are fine with their own. I respect the same principle around the world, it's an anti globalist ancestral rights principle.

And ancestral rights operate all around the world.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 May 2021 11.49am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I wish people who are honest with themselves would just strip away all the politics and realize the one important statistic.

White people make up only around 10% of the world population and shrinking.

Since everyone else seems to be obsessed with their colour and race these days, and with plenty of encouragement it seems, I feel it is perfectly acceptable to point out that my colour is in danger of all but disappearing.

Despite the clear evidence of the potential for this happening with large scale immigration into Europe and North America, some have been conditioned to think that this is some sort of Far Right conspiracy theory.

It’s not name calling though is it? People have looked at what PA stand for, would implement given the chance, and held it up to scrutinise exactly what it is you and others who support then believe in and want to see happen. That others find it extremely unpalatable, to say the least, is not name calling. I raised them on these boards as I think it’s important that people are aware of the kind of people that a prominent political poster on here aligns himself with and exactly what they stand for.

All you are doing is just trying to justify to yourself that the viewpoints you align yourself are acceptable and a ‘moderate’ position to take, when in reality they are abhorrent to those even right of centre as several posters on here have shown. The scales of right and left have not changed. You have just shifted further right wards, perhaps without even realising.

There is no problem wanting controlled immigration, that is not a contentious position whatsoever. Repatriation of anyone not deemed to be a British citizen and a hostile attitude towards anyone who can not trace their ancestral links back to here is and most people would have an issue with it.

Your position is also a denial of the human desire to want to explore, travel, broaden their horizons and to experience new places. Ever since humans walked the Earth they have moved from place to place, came, saw and conquered. Humans have never just stayed in one place. Globalisation is not a new concept by any stretch of the imagination.

Well it is kind of name calling because that's all I've seen coming back as arguments.

I'm perfectly ok with you criticising PA, some criticism might even be justified. However, I'm happy to argue the central point of the ancestral rights of Europeans.

On that I think many agree with me, but don't wish to comment because of the name calling and accusations of being neo Nazis....which we have seen on this thread.

If you seriously don't think that both the Tory and Labour party haven't shifted to the left then I don't know what to say to you.

You are either too ignorant to notice or you're just not being honest.

On the immigration issue, it's definitely true to say I'm more right wing on it now. On other issues, for example on corporations, I'm less right wing than before.

Repatriation already happens....or don't you seem to know? No one would be repatriated against their will who didn't have a right to be here.

This is about controlling immigration so that that native British are actually the majority in the country that bears their actual name. Once again, it's only taking us back to the polices of the past and the current policies of many countries around the world.

There is nothing wrong with travelling, exploring and all the rest of it. What is being suggested is no different to the policy of global countries like Japan for example. They are both global and protective of a Japanese majority in actual Japan!

You want to disfigure the argument away from these realities so you can portray it as something malign.

Yet you don't recognise the huge damage your politics has already done to the poor and vulnerable in this country....For example, the higher violence in London is precisely down to your globalised view....those with more money can move out (sound familiar?)..also the fact that London is no longer considered English is also down to the politics you support.

What about all the people who have suffered because of that?

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)