You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy
November 23 2024 1.52pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 242 of 289 < 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 >

  

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 10 Jan 24 10.22am Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That’s very simply because that’s not the way it works. The Commission, being totally non political, keeps all politicians at arms length to ensure that their role is maintained as completely independent in approach. That way they avoid even the appearance of political interference. The involvement of the politicians comes separately, via their own institutions, the Council and the Parliament, when they define priorities and then scrutinise and approve, or disapprove the results before enacting any actual laws.

Benn, as a politician, may well have been frustrated and tried to involve himself. He had a perfect right to do so and argue for change but the way it is currently set up that’s not what happens and I can see why. There are some tasks that are better done independently and without having to worry about having any politician riding their favourite hobby horse through the process. Their opportunities come later when the whole package is ready and other politicians can also chime in.

You may not like this style of democracy. I sense you are the type who believes we should have the right to take decisions, by binding referendums, on all kinds of issues. I imagine you would want the people to directly decide on capital punishment for instance, or whether we refuse all asylum seekers or to ban the recognition of transgenders. I don’t. I want our representatives to decide after they have received the advice of, and seen the results of the work from, the professional experts we employ to help them.

Yes, the Commission keeps the politicians at arms length, the politicians that the people have elected. Yes, the Commission is completely independent, it does whatever it wants despite the policies of the elected representatives. All that you have said just illustrates the fact that the EU is not democratic in any real sense.

I don’t particularly want referendums on any issue. If the government holds one, as they did in 2016, then they should honour the result.

Certainly I think the death penalty should be available as a sentence, not in all case, up to the judge. I would not want to refuse genuine asylum seekers, whose numbers would be so much smaller than the number of bogus ones. What do you mean by ‘recognition of transgenders’, I think I would recognise a man with a beard in a dress as some sort of degenerate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 10 Jan 24 11.46am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

The EU is nothing short of a near authoritarian power grab for the elite neo/social liberal political class.

Its defenders just play with soft focus words like democracy.....which they can define is ways that would have most people scratching their head.

It's like the 'abuse', 'assaults'' or 'hate' term. They play on the fact that most people still think of the old fashioned and honest usage of these terms to convince people that....say a push on your arm is 'assault', when most sensible people know the difference between that an a punch in the face.

If the real right wing held control of the EU commission and all the EU institutions and systems. People who defend the current EU would be screaming their hearts out that they were living in a dictatorship.

It isn't about principles or democracy or any such waffle. It's purely down to whether the people they prefer are in charge or not.

That's what it always comes down to.....Who your leaders are and how much choice the majority get over them.

They hold the one way megaphone and they filter your choices.

Democracy my arse.

Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Jan 2024 11.53am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 10 Jan 24 4.27pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

'We thought you would like a new disposable face-covering'.

From: - Amazon Shopping.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 10 Jan 24 8.27pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

Yes, the Commission keeps the politicians at arms length, the politicians that the people have elected. Yes, the Commission is completely independent, it does whatever it wants despite the policies of the elected representatives. All that you have said just illustrates the fact that the EU is not democratic in any real sense.

I don’t particularly want referendums on any issue. If the government holds one, as they did in 2016, then they should honour the result.

Certainly I think the death penalty should be available as a sentence, not in all case, up to the judge. I would not want to refuse genuine asylum seekers, whose numbers would be so much smaller than the number of bogus ones. What do you mean by ‘recognition of transgenders’, I think I would recognise a man with a beard in a dress as some sort of degenerate.

I despair!

The Commission is not totally independent. That is a fallacy widely believed by the anti -EU fanatics. It is bound by the treaties and can only act in ways that implement them. Its priorities are determined by the Council. The heads of state of the members collectively deciding what is most important. Their independence comes from being free of political influence during the time they initiate the detailed legislation which cannot pass into law until it has been scrutinised and approved by the politicians.

It’s a different system to ours because the situation in the EU is different to ours.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 10 Jan 24 8.43pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

What it comes down is not, has never been and cannot be “who your leaders are and how much choice the majority get over them.”

That’s the pathetic reasoning of the arch Brexiteers who freely admitted they were prepared to accept a steep decline in our prosperity from which we wouldn’t recover for 30:years in return for “getting back control”! What an empty deal. Putting their pride above the future of our children.

What it comes down is what delivers the best outcomes. Nothing more or less. Ensuring we retain the ultimate power to both delegate responsibility and withdraw it is an essential outcome but after that comes what makes us safe, strong, healthy and prosperous.

Being in control of a sinking ship is not a good outcome.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 10 Jan 24 9.21pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I despair!

The Commission is not totally independent. That is a fallacy widely believed by the anti -EU fanatics. It is bound by the treaties and can only act in ways that implement them. Its priorities are determined by the Council. The heads of state of the members collectively deciding what is most important. Their independence comes from being free of political influence during the time they initiate the detailed legislation which cannot pass into law until it has been scrutinised and approved by the politicians.

It’s a different system to ours because the situation in the EU is different to ours.

What Tony Benn said contradicts most of what you say. Benn was actually a member of the Council of Ministers and saw how things were run at first hand. Benn and many others on the left and right could see that the EU was fundamentally undemocratic, as did those who voted to leave.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 11 Jan 24 8.34am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

What Tony Benn said contradicts most of what you say. Benn was actually a member of the Council of Ministers and saw how things were run at first hand. Benn and many others on the left and right could see that the EU was fundamentally undemocratic, as did those who voted to leave.

Benn was, like Corbyn, as the Marxists they both were, fundamentally opposed to the EU. So it’s hardly any surprise that he didn’t find the way the Council of Ministers worked to his taste. Farage was a MEP and spent most of his time in the Chamber moaning about it too.

That you agree with Benn and Corbyn ought perhaps give you pause for thought.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 11 Jan 24 8.36am Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Benn was, like Corbyn, as the Marxists they both were, fundamentally opposed to the EU. So it’s hardly any surprise that he didn’t find the way the Council of Ministers worked to his taste. Farage was a MEP and spent most of his time in the Chamber moaning about it too.

That you agree with Benn and Corbyn ought perhaps give you pause for thought.

Enoch Powell's view on this was exactly the same as Benn's. Presumably you think Powell was a Marxist too?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 11 Jan 24 9.15am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

Enoch Powell's view on this was exactly the same as Benn's. Presumably you think Powell was a Marxist too?

I am old enough to have witnessed Powell in office and to have heard him. He was a complicated man. Obviously sincere, intelligent and an orator. He would have made a good, possibly even great, war time leader. What he lacked was any sense of compassion for the common man, for the poor and disadvantaged. He was an early example of the type of attitude found today in the likes of Farage and Rees-Mogg. People who value independence far more than prosperity. Presumably because their own prosperity would remain intact and quite possibly be enhanced.

So not a Marxist but equally distasteful.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 11 Jan 24 9.57am Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am old enough to have witnessed Powell in office and to have heard him. He was a complicated man. Obviously sincere, intelligent and an orator. He would have made a good, possibly even great, war time leader. What he lacked was any sense of compassion for the common man, for the poor and disadvantaged. He was an early example of the type of attitude found today in the likes of Farage and Rees-Mogg. People who value independence far more than prosperity. Presumably because their own prosperity would remain intact and quite possibly be enhanced.

So not a Marxist but equally distasteful.

I am merely pointing out that the recognition of the undemocratic nature of the EU was and is recognised by people of both the left and right of politics.

There is nothing in Powell's life to suggest that he lacked compassion for the common man, the poor and the disadvantaged. He did a great deal in opposing policies that would adversely affect the ordinary man - as does Farage.

Also, Powell was not particularly 'rich'.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 11 Jan 24 11.15am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Enoch Powell was the last politician this country produced who cared more for the native people of these islands than his own career.

He was raised in a time where the elite were still somewhat connected to their people and worth a damn.....It should not be forgotten that when Powell was growing up the vast majority of the wealth class still had loyalty to their country.....not egalitarian and globalist fantasy concepts.

They were still part of the fabric that once made this union of countries great amongst the nations.

Powell was a stellar academic in the classics, one of the highest achieving of his era and any....which is something in comparison to today considering how far academic standards have fallen.

Not many people know but Powell had written love letters to fellow academics as a young man. We don't know if this ever went beyond that. However, as an adult he settled down as a stable family man who had children - two daughters. He was never an advocate for what we see today.

In war service he passed out top from his officer training was promoted and transferred to the intelligence corps as a captain. He was involved in planning at El Alamein and was awarded the MBE and was made a lieutenant-colonel before Mountbatten made him Secretary to the Joint Intelligence Committee for India to assist with planning offensives in Burma. By the end of the war he was a brigadier......he was one of only two men in the entire war to rise from private to brigadier

Powell never experienced combat and felt guilty for having survived.

I'll cut this short because he's life was so full this could be a very long post. Anyway most people don't know that he started out in the Labour party and was quickly recognised as a leading light but for various reasons moved to the Conservatives.

Quickly promoted, ironically he ended up being the health minister who went to the Caribbean to recruit doctors and nurses. His opinion changed radically once he realised that they weren't going back and that the will to make them wasn't there.

Unlike the traitorous Tories in his party he was willing to throw away his stellar career and high reputation to speak the truth about what the elites were doing to their own people.

Pretty much all his predictions came true....not surprisingly as he was just brighter than those in charge.

He is a hero.....that rare elite bird who was worth a damn.

Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Jan 2024 11.40am)

somecared.JPG Attachment: somecared.JPG (110.08Kb)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 11 Jan 24 1.42pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

I am merely pointing out that the recognition of the undemocratic nature of the EU was and is recognised by people of both the left and right of politics.

There is nothing in Powell's life to suggest that he lacked compassion for the common man, the poor and the disadvantaged. He did a great deal in opposing policies that would adversely affect the ordinary man - as does Farage.

Also, Powell was not particularly 'rich'.

No you aren’t. You are merely pointing out that those who cling to out dated ideas have always existed. It’s this, and only this, that binds this disparate group together.

That they, and you apparently, believe their policies were ultimately to the benefit of the common man is just what every right wing politician argues as they contemplate the performance of their investments.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 242 of 289 < 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy