Isn't protection of (potential) victims the first priority ?
Secondary, is then human rights for victims and suspects. ?

justice is a long way from these starter points ^^

Or am i just being too sensitive ?

Edited by Forest Hillbilly (09 Mar 2020 8.01am)

I disengage, I turn the page.

Observing Ash Sarkar on twitter and video at the moment is quite amusing in of itself.

Suddenly she's all for racial jokes....but seemingly only when she, or those she likes says it.....Of course I do actually support her free speech on this.

However she is, of course, a huge hypocrite....which is basically what most of the 'progressives' are.

'Identity politics for me, not for thee'.

Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Mar 2020 9.12am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

[Tweet Link]

I see them in many many ways as actively colluding. It is impossible to believe they did not know about what was going on. Official reports state that files disappeared from supposedly secure locations along with an entire web of links between Labour councillors and the abusers.

Labour allowed this abuse to continue for decades, and would happily allow it to continue even now, in exchange for the Muslim block vote.

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

You missed my point

I didn't say it wasn't sexual assault, albeit I can find no independent verification on what happened, I have no idea whether there was sexual intention if touching genuinely happened.

My point was it wasn't ongoing when Yaxley-Lennon attacked the man in question. However, if you are happy for him to be judge and jury in this instance, and the Courts agree with you, then he will be able to establish mitigation when the inevitable conviction comes.

is this what you mean when you say 'I didnt say she wasnt being sexually assaulted'??