This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Jimmy Doyle Butterworth 05 Feb 24 3.09am | |
---|---|
It's time for Roy and Ray to retire. Left by mutual agreement should be acceptable to all parties.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Henry of Peckham Eton Mess 05 Feb 24 7.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimmy Doyle
It's time for Roy and Ray to retire. Left by mutual agreement should be acceptable to all parties. That time was at the end of last season, Roy and Steve should have known better (altho easily said in hindsight) ... It must be very difficult to bring in a decent manager at this stage of the season?
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HesHereHesThere Beckenham 05 Feb 24 8.02am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Henry of Peckham
That time was at the end of last season, Roy and Steve should have known better (altho easily said in hindsight) ... It must be very difficult to bring in a decent manager at this stage of the season? Especially considering no one wanted the job in the summer and Parish had to persuade Roy to take it…we’re even less appealing now!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 05 Feb 24 8.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HesHereHesThere
Especially considering no one wanted the job in the summer and Parish had to persuade Roy to take it…we’re even less appealing now! Apparently, we'll be able to get a Hot Dog and soft drink in exchange for our CVs at the Chelsea game.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
VinceHilaire London 05 Feb 24 8.09am | |
---|---|
I think if Roy & Ray take training today - then assume they are there for the season!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 05 Feb 24 8.17am | |
---|---|
If he’s back in charge of training this morning then it’s likely he’ll be in charge of the Chelsea game.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
robdave2k 05 Feb 24 8.25am | |
---|---|
I think half the issue is that they've pulled the trigger to late - no one will want it now. We've a better squad than a few teams, but our manager seems to want to drill into us we are not good enough. When he was at Liverpool - the players there said they were made to be fearful of the opposition, not concentrate on how good they were. Hrolf mentioned somewhere about missing Eze, Olise, Doucoure, etc - well I can't help but think Roy's training methods are not suited to any kind of attacking player. It's clear we don't practice any form of attacking, and it's all structure in defence and our flair players are being overworked. Sadly I think Roy is a relic of a bygone era - and also a stubborn old man unable to admit any kind of mistake - take his England leaving interview. Unable to take any kind of responsibility or understand how he could possibly have got anything wrong. He'd have had Wright and Bright defending from the front in 1990, and we'd have gone down. I don't feel the same kind of connection to Palace these days, and sadly Roy is part of that. Organisation is what you need when you are in crisis, managed progression is what you need when you are stable. What was progressive 50 years ago isn't now. At one time trench warfare was progressive. I think we are stuck with him though and if I was a Palace player I'd be looking at my manager thinking that he wouldn't inspire a rabbit to reproduce. Then he'd replace the rabbit with a young player and blame the young player when it doesn't happen. Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.26am) Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.30am) Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.31am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 05 Feb 24 8.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by robdave2k
I think half the issue is that they've pulled the trigger to late - no one will want it now. We've a better squad than a few teams, but our manager seems to want to drill into us we are not good enough. When he was at Liverpool - the players there said they were made to be fearful of the opposition, not concentrate on how good they were. Hrolf mentioned somewhere about missing Eze, Olise, Doucoure, etc - well I can't help but think Roy's training methods are not suited to any kind of attacking player. It's clear we don't practice any form of attacking, and it's all structure in defence and our flair players are being overworked. Sadly I think Roy is a relic of a bygone era - and also a stubborn old man unable to admit any kind of mistake - take his England leaving interview. Unable to take any kind of responsibility or understand how he could possibly have got anything wrong. He'd have had Wright and Bright defending from the front in 1990, and we'd have gone down. I don't feel the same kind of connection to Palace these days, and sadly Roy is part of that. Organisation is what you need when you are in crisis, managed progression is what you need when you are stable. What was progressive 50 years ago isn't now. At one time trench warfare was progressive. I think we are stuck with him though and if I was a Palace player I'd be looking at my manager thinking that he wouldn't inspire a rabbit to reproduce. Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.26am) Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.30am) All correct IMHO robdave2k. A team that had sincere limitations and needed anachronistic coaching to just steady the ship sure, bring in Roy. A team where we're investing in a more youthful squad, and may have our star players out injured from time to time, he's been a f**king disaster. He's not suited for the modern game, not suited for modern players, not fit to still be working at his age and looks to have lost the players and the fans. What's the point?
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 05 Feb 24 8.37am | |
---|---|
The only focus here should be on the best way to keep the club up. We have to let Parish make the decision on who manages the team based on prevailing circumstances. Shouting abuse at the chairman, manager and players and holding up stupid banners will only make matters worse. Surely everyone wants the same thing here. Premier League next season.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
robdave2k 05 Feb 24 8.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The only focus here should be on the best way to keep the club up. We have to let Parish make the decision on who manages the team based on prevailing circumstances. Shouting abuse at the chairman, manager and players and holding up stupid banners will only make matters worse. Surely everyone wants the same thing here. Premier League next season. Not wanting to do he said/she said Hrolf, but can't help but think Roy started all this with his comments about the supporters. Then having a go at the youngsters.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
MrRobbo Chaldon 05 Feb 24 9.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The only focus here should be on the best way to keep the club up. We have to let Parish make the decision on who manages the team based on prevailing circumstances. Shouting abuse at the chairman, manager and players and holding up stupid banners will only make matters worse. Surely everyone wants the same thing here. Premier League next season. I must admit, I've never been a fan of the banners. Especially not aimed at Parish. He's got his faults, but loves the club and will be hurting. 24k people saying he's f*cked up isn't helpful. He sees the matches, and will be well aware. But back to your opening point, yes absolutely. But what is the answer? We are getting to the point where it feels as though Roy has lost the players. So there may be no other good options available now, but what do we do, put Paddy in? Jeez. If we needed a 0-0 draw on the last day of the season I'd rather still have Roy in charge (I think).
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 05 Feb 24 9.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by robdave2k
I think half the issue is that they've pulled the trigger to late - no one will want it now. We've a better squad than a few teams, but our manager seems to want to drill into us we are not good enough. When he was at Liverpool - the players there said they were made to be fearful of the opposition, not concentrate on how good they were. Hrolf mentioned somewhere about missing Eze, Olise, Doucoure, etc - well I can't help but think Roy's training methods are not suited to any kind of attacking player. It's clear we don't practice any form of attacking, and it's all structure in defence and our flair players are being overworked. Sadly I think Roy is a relic of a bygone era - and also a stubborn old man unable to admit any kind of mistake - take his England leaving interview. Unable to take any kind of responsibility or understand how he could possibly have got anything wrong. He'd have had Wright and Bright defending from the front in 1990, and we'd have gone down. I don't feel the same kind of connection to Palace these days, and sadly Roy is part of that. Organisation is what you need when you are in crisis, managed progression is what you need when you are stable. What was progressive 50 years ago isn't now. At one time trench warfare was progressive. I think we are stuck with him though and if I was a Palace player I'd be looking at my manager thinking that he wouldn't inspire a rabbit to reproduce. Then he'd replace the rabbit with a young player and blame the young player when it doesn't happen. Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.26am) Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.30am) Edited by robdave2k (05 Feb 2024 8.31am) Excellent post. Parish had all summer to find a new manager, couldn't find one (for whatever reason) and opted for the cheapest and easiest option, Croydon Roy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.