Sick of Harry & Meghan?

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Sick of Harry & Meghan?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 24 of 33 < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 >

becky over the moon 10 Mar 21 9.31pm
Possible exchange? "I wonder how black you baby will be? It would be good to have some real diversity in the royal family as a reflection of the modern society we represent" Well, yes, I just had a conversation about how black a mixed-race person's baby could be......... but is it racist? Well, it could be if you didn't have all the quote! Content, context and co-text matter! A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 10 Mar 21 9.31pm

Possible exchange?

"I wonder how black you baby will be? It would be good to have some real diversity in the royal family as a reflection of the modern society we represent"

Well, yes, I just had a conversation about how black a mixed-race person's baby could be......... but is it racist? Well, it could be if you didn't have all the quote!

Content, context and co-text matter!

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

georgenorman 11 Mar 21 6.55am
From the BBC: “The executive director of an industry body for the UK press has resigned after a row over its reaction to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's comments about racism in the media. Ian Murray said he would step down from his role at the Society of Editors so it could ‘rebuild its reputation’. Prince Harry said some British tabloids were ‘racist’ and ‘bigoted’. The Society of Editors initially denied that and said such an ‘attack’ was ‘not acceptable’ without providing evidence.” So we have now reached the Orwellian position where you have to resign if you do not abjectly accept that you are a racist when anyone merely says that you are - or indeed if you are not accused of racism yourself, but an organisation that you are associated with involves people that are. [Link] Edited by georgenorman (11 Mar 2021 7.02am)
Alert a moderator to this post

georgenorman

11 Mar 21 6.55am

From the BBC:
“The executive director of an industry body for the UK press has resigned after a row over its reaction to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's comments about racism in the media.
Ian Murray said he would step down from his role at the Society of Editors so it could ‘rebuild its reputation’.
Prince Harry said some British tabloids were ‘racist’ and ‘bigoted’.
The Society of Editors initially denied that and said such an ‘attack’ was ‘not acceptable’ without providing evidence.”
So we have now reached the Orwellian position where you have to resign if you do not abjectly accept that you are a racist when anyone merely says that you are - or indeed if you are not accused of racism yourself, but an organisation that you are associated with involves people that are.
[Link]

Edited by georgenorman (11 Mar 2021 7.02am)

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 11 Mar 21 7.44am
So Meghan declared her passport was taken away and she did not leave the house for “months”. The 13 trips she took abroad in that time, including a baby shower in NY do not count? Or perhaps she just forgot about them. Yet another untruth but hey let’s all rally round her, as she has been so downtrodden [Link] Edited by Spiderman (11 Mar 2021 7.47am) Edited by Spiderman (11 Mar 2021 7.48am)
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 11 Mar 21 7.44am

So Meghan declared her passport was taken away and she did not leave the house for “months”. The 13 trips she took abroad in that time, including a baby shower in NY do not count? Or perhaps she just forgot about them. Yet another untruth but hey let’s all rally
round her, as she has been so downtrodden

[Link]

Edited by Spiderman (11 Mar 2021 7.47am)

Edited by Spiderman (11 Mar 2021 7.48am)

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 11 Mar 21 8.17am
Megan said she and Harry were married by the Archbishop of Canterbury 3 days before the big event privately. It has been pointed out that if this is true then one of these weddings was illegal. So far the Archbishop has declined to comment which is disgraceful. The courts have made it very clear that weddings are public events there is no right to privacy and no such thing as a secret wedding, this is to protect vulnerable people. So if it took place as Megan described the Archbishop needs to explain how this was legal. If it didn't take place then he needs to clarify that as well. He should not remain silent. My guess is that it was probably the wedding rehearsal and nothing more in which case this needs to be explained to Megan. One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 11 Mar 21 8.17am

Megan said she and Harry were married by the Archbishop of Canterbury 3 days before the big event privately.

It has been pointed out that if this is true then one of these weddings was illegal. So far the Archbishop has declined to comment which is disgraceful.

The courts have made it very clear that weddings are public events there is no right to privacy and no such thing as a secret wedding, this is to protect vulnerable people.

So if it took place as Megan described the Archbishop needs to explain how this was legal. If it didn't take place then he needs to clarify that as well. He should not remain silent.

My guess is that it was probably the wedding rehearsal and nothing more in which case this needs to be explained to Megan.

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 11 Mar 21 9.04am
Originally posted by Badger11 Megan said she and Harry were married by the Archbishop of Canterbury 3 days before the big event privately. It has been pointed out that if this is true then one of these weddings was illegal. So far the Archbishop has declined to comment which is disgraceful. The courts have made it very clear that weddings are public events there is no right to privacy and no such thing as a secret wedding, this is to protect vulnerable people. So if it took place as Megan described the Archbishop needs to explain how this was legal. If it didn't take place then he needs to clarify that as well. He should not remain silent. My guess is that it was probably the wedding rehearsal and nothing more in which case this needs to be explained to Megan. I thought along the same lines, and the AOC should explain. It seems that anyone that disbelieves her are being held accountable but she has not been challenged on several topics where she has been economical with the truth
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 11 Mar 21 9.04am

Originally posted by Badger11

Megan said she and Harry were married by the Archbishop of Canterbury 3 days before the big event privately.

It has been pointed out that if this is true then one of these weddings was illegal. So far the Archbishop has declined to comment which is disgraceful.

The courts have made it very clear that weddings are public events there is no right to privacy and no such thing as a secret wedding, this is to protect vulnerable people.

So if it took place as Megan described the Archbishop needs to explain how this was legal. If it didn't take place then he needs to clarify that as well. He should not remain silent.

My guess is that it was probably the wedding rehearsal and nothing more in which case this needs to be explained to Megan.

I thought along the same lines, and the AOC should explain. It seems that anyone that disbelieves her are being held accountable but she has not been challenged on several topics where she has been economical with the truth

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Mar 21 9.59am
She lives a fantasy in her head. No wonder she wanted to marry him. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 11 Mar 21 9.59am

She lives a fantasy in her head. No wonder she wanted to marry him.

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

becky over the moon 11 Mar 21 10.11am
Originally posted by Badger11 Megan said she and Harry were married by the Archbishop of Canterbury 3 days before the big event privately. It has been pointed out that if this is true then one of these weddings was illegal. So far the Archbishop has declined to comment which is disgraceful. The courts have made it very clear that weddings are public events there is no right to privacy and no such thing as a secret wedding, this is to protect vulnerable people. So if it took place as Megan described the Archbishop needs to explain how this was legal. If it didn't take place then he needs to clarify that as well. He should not remain silent. My guess is that it was probably the wedding rehearsal and nothing more in which case this needs to be explained to Megan. Not only must they be held in a place to which the public have free access (so that any objections can be voiced), it also has to be in a place licensed for matrimony and MUST be held in the presence of 2 witness. So not at all legal on any count...... A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 11 Mar 21 10.11am

Originally posted by Badger11

Megan said she and Harry were married by the Archbishop of Canterbury 3 days before the big event privately.

It has been pointed out that if this is true then one of these weddings was illegal. So far the Archbishop has declined to comment which is disgraceful.

The courts have made it very clear that weddings are public events there is no right to privacy and no such thing as a secret wedding, this is to protect vulnerable people.

So if it took place as Megan described the Archbishop needs to explain how this was legal. If it didn't take place then he needs to clarify that as well. He should not remain silent.

My guess is that it was probably the wedding rehearsal and nothing more in which case this needs to be explained to Megan.

Not only must they be held in a place to which the public have free access (so that any objections can be voiced), it also has to be in a place licensed for matrimony and MUST be held in the presence of 2 witness. So not at all legal on any count......

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Mar 21 10.42am
Originally posted by becky Not only must they be held in a place to which the public have free access (so that any objections can be voiced), it also has to be in a place licensed for matrimony and MUST be held in the presence of 2 witness. So not at all legal on any count...... It’s a two fingers up at the royals and a ‘look how clever we are/ we fooled you/we’re not really into riches and glamour, look at our chicken house. Just make sure they never see how expensive the inside of our home looks.’ Her dress in the interview cost 4 or 5 grand. I’ve always hated Morgan, but fair play for dying on his sword for standing by this being a sham, even if he knows or is confident he’ll be offered more big contracts. I think he probably knew many people didn’t believe it or think they weren’t treated badly like they’ve said. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 11 Mar 21 10.42am

Originally posted by becky

It’s a two fingers up at the royals and a ‘look how clever we are/ we fooled you/we’re not really into riches and glamour, look at our chicken house. Just make sure they never see how expensive the inside of our home looks.’

Her dress in the interview cost 4 or 5 grand.

I’ve always hated Morgan, but fair play for dying on his sword for standing by this being a sham, even if he knows or is confident he’ll be offered more big contracts. I think he probably knew many people didn’t believe it or think they weren’t treated badly like they’ve said.

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 11 Mar 21 10.45am
People like Megan are always there, especially so in her industry. The real person of blame here is Harry. He has debased and betrayed his firm. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

11 Mar 21 10.45am

People like Megan are always there, especially so in her industry.

The real person of blame here is Harry. He has debased and betrayed his firm.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

georgenorman 11 Mar 21 10.50am
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman It’s a two fingers up at the royals and a ‘look how clever we are/ we fooled you/we’re not really into riches and glamour, look at our chicken house. Just make sure they never see how expensive the inside of our home looks.’ Her dress in the interview cost 4 or 5 grand. I’ve always hated Morgan, but fair play for dying on his sword for standing by this being a sham, even if he knows or is confident he’ll be offered more big contracts. I think he probably knew many people didn’t believe it or think they weren’t treated badly like they’ve said. Perhaps Morgan had their phones hacked? Edited by georgenorman (11 Mar 2021 11.02am)
Alert a moderator to this post

georgenorman

11 Mar 21 10.50am

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Her dress in the interview cost 4 or 5 grand.

Perhaps Morgan had their phones hacked?

Edited by georgenorman (11 Mar 2021 11.02am)

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Mar 21 11.29am
Originally posted by georgenorman Perhaps Morgan had their phones hacked? Edited by georgenorman (11 Mar 2021 11.02am) Yes, well it’s quite something when the BBS agree with Piers Morgan. It’s mainly naive young people who don’t, or mainly younger female black people who’ve flown off the handle without analysing the individual people and claims. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 11 Mar 21 11.29am

Originally posted by georgenorman

Perhaps Morgan had their phones hacked?

Edited by georgenorman (11 Mar 2021 11.02am)

Yes, well it’s quite something when the BBS agree with Piers Morgan. It’s mainly naive young people who don’t, or mainly younger female black people who’ve flown off the handle without analysing the individual people and claims.

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 11 Mar 21 12.25pm
Originally posted by becky Not only must they be held in a place to which the public have free access (so that any objections can be voiced), it also has to be in a place licensed for matrimony and MUST be held in the presence of 2 witness. So not at all legal on any count...... Will anyone pull her up on another fabrication of the truth?
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 11 Mar 21 12.25pm

Originally posted by becky

Will anyone pull her up on another fabrication of the truth?

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 24 of 33 < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Sick of Harry & Meghan?

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors