This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Oct 17 12.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Now now ! I know what you are inferring but alas you are on the wrong track.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 19 Oct 17 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Dumb, unfunny, insensitive and probably not something he would have said to someone visiting Africa that wasn't of African background. Talk about leaning into a punch. The minute she proved not to be a good enough player he had handed her some decent ammunition on a plate. She could rationalise to others - and maybe to herself to make her feel better - that he had a downer on Africans. They couldn't be trusted - for example - to visit Africa without catching Ebola. In any case it's such a horrible disease you just don't joke about it in that kind of way.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
npn Crowborough 19 Oct 17 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Edit to add - insensitive, of course (given people were/are dying), but in no way racist Edited by npn (19 Oct 2017 12.03pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Oct 17 12.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
What he said can be understood to mean make sure your parents don't bring the dirty disease over here or a disease from your country behind this clean place. Saying it to a black woman regarding a Black Country was more foot in mouth than intended racism but I'd be surprised if many people didnysay they'd wished they'd never said those specific words straight afterwards. Like I said, you're not going to hear it very often. If you did you may get reprimanded or spend many lunchtimes without many invites I would've thought. So it wasn't 'racism' as claimed by the committee. We finally got there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 19 Oct 17 12.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So it wasn't 'racism' as claimed by the committee. We finally got there. Not intended but it could be understood to mean, to a black person from a Black Country, make sure your parents don't bring a dirty disease from that country. It's dodgy ground and has racial undertones. I'd be surprised if someone said that kind of thing to a black African colleague they didn't know could take it and they weren't concerned afterwards it was taken in the same way she's saying.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 19 Oct 17 12.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Any man taking this job is a fool. The things I've heard women say and.....nothing...Most men don't have huge chips on their shoulders.....Anyone with sense knows these are uneven and toxic situations. The race card is played for maximum effect and advantage......and like was mentioned previously Karen Brady had a relationship with a player and....nothing. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Oct 2017 10.30am) Perhaps because he didn't complain. The issue generally isn't people having relationships at work - its where they create problems at work. I know you think the system is totally rigged against men, and to an extent it is, because historically they're the ones who have been the culprits in abusing their position at work and the primary cause of sexual harassment in the work place. That said, when you sign up to a companies policy on work - you kind of are bound to maintain it. My guess would be that like most employers, they don't pursue cases based on what is reported to them, but where complaints are received. Yeah, as a man you probably do have to be a bit more careful of what you say at work, and relationships you have, because you are more vulnerable, largely based on the history of problems that preceded you. But it doesn't automatically entail that everyone is lying or manipulating situations to get to you either - To be held accountable, the balance of evidence has to be against you. If you're the coach of a womans football team, you probably should be very careful about having sexual relationships with players - especially casual relationships. I do kind of object to the idea that somehow the woman here is automatically in the wrong, because she's not thick skinned enough, can't take a joke or understand banter. The work place is a professional environment - you should be cautious about what you say on a personal level and you can be held accountable for people taking it 'the wrong way'. That said, the FA seem to have taken this completely out of control of their own process and proceedings here - allowing to much specualation to form the basis of peoples opinions. These kind of things should be more open in terms of reporting, like other court cases.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 19 Oct 17 12.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So it wasn't 'racism' as claimed by the committee. We finally got there. No the hearing demonstrated that the statements were racist, though the barrister form the plaintiff clearly stated that Mark Sampson was not. Its a court case its not about what people might have meant, or how it might have been said to someone who wasn't black, but what was said, to who and whether it contravenes the FA tribunal rules, or rulings relating to race that supersede them in authority. Something said as a joke, is only mitigation of damages / sentencing. You are responsible for what you said, to whomever, if it contravenes policy or laws, regardless of intention (excepting a few areas where specific protections are applied).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 19 Oct 17 12.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Perhaps because he didn't complain. The issue generally isn't people having relationships at work - its where they create problems at work. I know you think the system is totally rigged against men, and to an extent it is, because historically they're the ones who have been the culprits in abusing their position at work and the primary cause of sexual harassment in the work place. That said, when you sign up to a companies policy on work - you kind of are bound to maintain it. My guess would be that like most employers, they don't pursue cases based on what is reported to them, but where complaints are received. Yeah, as a man you probably do have to be a bit more careful of what you say at work, and relationships you have, because you are more vulnerable, largely based on the history of problems that preceded you. But it doesn't automatically entail that everyone is lying or manipulating situations to get to you either - To be held accountable, the balance of evidence has to be against you. If you're the coach of a womans football team, you probably should be very careful about having sexual relationships with players - especially casual relationships. I do kind of object to the idea that somehow the woman here is automatically in the wrong, because she's not thick skinned enough, can't take a joke or understand banter. The work place is a professional environment - you should be cautious about what you say on a personal level and you can be held accountable for people taking it 'the wrong way'. That said, the FA seem to have taken this completely out of control of their own process and proceedings here - allowing to much specualation to form the basis of peoples opinions. These kind of things should be more open in terms of reporting, like other court cases. I completely reject his type of 'snowflake', 'it's not racist to you but it is to me' society......it's bollocks and I want nothing to do with it. I also reject the idea that's it's ok because women were somehow disadvantaged in the past....a 'sins of the fathers' argument. I have no respect for these edicts.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 19 Oct 17 12.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Dumb, unfunny, insensitive and probably not something he would have said to someone visiting Africa that wasn't of African background. Talk about leaning into a punch. The minute she proved not to be a good enough player he had handed her some decent ammunition on a plate. She could rationalise to others - and maybe to herself to make her feel better - that he had a downer on Africans. They couldn't be trusted - for example - to visit Africa without catching Ebola. In any case it's such a horrible disease you just don't joke about it in that kind of way. All these PC puritans!......Could you get on a plane to the west coast of America and leave the rest of us to it please. Fecking hell!
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Oct 17 12.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Not intended but it could be understood to mean, to a black person from a Black Country, make sure your parents don't bring a dirty disease from that country. It's dodgy ground and has racial undertones. I'd be surprised if someone said that kind of thing to a black African colleague they didn't know could take it and they weren't concerned afterwards it was taken in the same way she's saying. So basically we have to pander to oversensitive people if they are Black irrespective of whether what we say is actually 'racist'. Is there anything else while we are at it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 19 Oct 17 12.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
All these PC puritans!......Could you get on a plane to the west coast of America and leave the rest of us to it please. Fecking hell! If you/we/she has a choice of hearing such stuff, at a comedy show or on a tv comedy show, then all well and good. But it appears she or anyone else didn't have a choice on what they hear unlike in most professional workplaces. That kind of comment would've followed with silence from all in earshot. I can't think of many places where what he said would be normal. Self employed builders who could just get another job tomorrow on a building site maybe. The bus depot? Possibly if joker knew how it would be taken. Possibly not, and get the reaction you weren't expecting.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Oct 17 12.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
No the hearing demonstrated that the statements were racist, though the barrister form the plaintiff clearly stated that Mark Sampson was not. Its a court case its not about what people might have meant, or how it might have been said to someone who wasn't black, but what was said, to who and whether it contravenes the FA tribunal rules, or rulings relating to race that supersede them in authority. Something said as a joke, is only mitigation of damages / sentencing. You are responsible for what you said, to whomever, if it contravenes policy or laws, regardless of intention (excepting a few areas where specific protections are applied). It's entirely down to enterpretation and I've yet to hear anything to persuade me that it was 'racist' and not a political fit up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.