This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Aug 17 1.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
What is your stance on some of the highly unflattering passages concerning people of colour and foreigners in general in Conan Doyles' books? Don't waste your energy plumbing the depths of Nick's thinking. You wouldn't believe he was married and in his forties.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Aug 17 1.46pm | |
---|---|
He's alright.....goes too far sometimes...the racism thing is an example..but no doubt we all do occasionally...I sometimes think Nick thinks he's Heath Ledger's Joker chucking in 'stir up' bombs to stir it up. He's good for Hol in a round-about way. Every yin needs its yang and he's apart of that. He has his own sense of justice and that's alright. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Aug 2017 1.47pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Aug 17 1.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
YAWN. you can tell It's half term *24 Hour poster boy* Half term?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Aug 17 2.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
He's alright.....goes too far sometimes...the racism thing is an example..but no doubt we all do occasionally...I sometimes think Nick thinks he's Heath Ledger's Joker chucking in 'stir up' bombs to stir it up. He's good for Hol in a round-about way. Every yin needs its yang and he's apart of that. He has his own sense of justice and that's alright. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Aug 2017 1.47pm) Really? There are plenty of people on here who present very reasonable arguments from all sides of politics and can write very impressively on a number of subjects.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 21 Aug 17 2.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You struggle answering questions. Probably a reflection of your painfully obvious self absorption. Haven't my comments laid it out as overtly as possible? If the local democracy around vote for something that's within the law then I have no issues with it. So if they want a statue there or not a statue there that's for them. I don't agree with mobs tearing down statues no....This happens in times of war and conflict but I've never agreed that this is how you deal with stuff.
Why the ad hominem attack Stirling? And by the way I look forward to your examples. Coming back to the point, no you have not answered the question. If the question is 'should people rally against extremists or simply allow the law to handle the issue' then the law is not designed for that. It is designed for when people overstep the mark in a specific case but not for when people continually sail close to the wind to build an impression over time that what they say has validity. That is when you need opposing viewpoints. Considering all that you have said on this site about allowing freedom of speach and encouraging a variety of view I am actually shocked that you appear to disapprove of direct action. I don't approve of breaking the law but I heartily approve of groups of people banding together to protest. It's also rather good fun. Edited by Mapletree (21 Aug 2017 2.34pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Aug 17 3.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Why the ad hominem attack Stirling? And by the way I look forward to your examples. Coming back to the point, no you have not answered the question. If the question is 'should people rally against extremists or simply allow the law to handle the issue' then the law is not designed for that. It is designed for when people overstep the mark in a specific case but not for when people continually sail close to the wind to build an impression over time that what they say has validity. That is when you need opposing viewpoints. Considering all that you have said on this site about allowing freedom of speach and encouraging a variety of view I am actually shocked that you appear to disapprove of direct action. I don't approve of breaking the law but I heartily approve of groups of people banding together to protest. It's also rather good fun. Edited by Mapletree (21 Aug 2017 2.34pm) I wouldn't take my 'ad hominem' attacks too seriously....let's say I'm a critical person...too critical sometimes...it's a character flaw...I can't help it...see I'm even criticising myself.....Being a teacher doesn't help....being an arsehole is almost a part requirement (though there are lovely teachers as well). For me, I take the position that opinions are opinions and actions are actions....don't get me wrong, we know where are overlaps and that cause and affect are realities but I step very carefully on that minefield. Sometimes people say 'sh1t' and it isn't nice but doing stuff about it ends up causing more harm than good long term.....I think we are on that path at the moment and I'm most definitely 'tutting' about it. Recent movements towards 'hate speech' ....which I initially had a little sympathy for but have since become a critic of.....Well, those movements are worrying to me. I'm a believer in the restrictions on libel, violence and obscenity....but setting these restrictions lower rather than higher....because society contains very different groups and I'm more socially liberal than not. If people are banding together to cause violence I most definitely want the Police to intervene in that....that's what taxes are for. If people are banding together to protest something then I have zero problem with that.....as long as they aren't smashing windows or physically involving themselves it's a healthy display of democracy. Of course if one group of morons rush you then self defence is valid. However, placing yourself in their path is deliberately setting up a fight. I'm aware that my stance kind of inhibits revolution....it's essentially protecting the establishment when sometimes the establishment is far from ideal. However I watched a clip on TV a while back where they were in Russia interviewing some guy on the street about revolution and he said, 'good rarely comes from revolutions'......he's right...normally you are replacing one set of arseholes with another set of arseholes with different priorities....It's just a different set of people lined up against the wall. Better to reform the arseholes you have.....though I recognise that this isn't always possible....so context for every situation is relevant. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Aug 2017 3.43pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Aug 17 3.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Really? There are plenty of people on here who present very reasonable arguments from all sides of politics and can write very impressively on a number of subjects. The Nick of old use to be less conflict and more interested in discussion .....ok not as much as some but it was there. He's more Wolfe Smith now but it's all part of the Hol diaspora. There are plenty of cerebral left of centre commentators for discussion and trading of ideas... though we don't have many centralists....and you get your Kermits and Nicks for your rows and rants. We all know we get worse.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 21 Aug 17 4.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I wouldn't take my 'ad hominem' attacks too seriously....let's say I'm a critical person...too critical sometimes...it's a character flaw...I can't help it...see I'm even criticising myself.....Being a teacher doesn't help....being an arsehole is almost a part requirement (though there are lovely teachers as well). For me, I take the position that opinions are opinions and actions are actions....don't get me wrong, we know where are overlaps and that cause and affect are realities but I step very carefully on that minefield. Sometimes people say 'sh1t' and it isn't nice but doing stuff about it ends up causing more harm than good long term.....I think we are on that path at the moment and I'm most definitely 'tutting' about it. Recent movements towards 'hate speech' ....which I initially had a little sympathy for but have since become a critic of.....Well, those movements are worrying to me. I'm a believer in the restrictions on libel, violence and obscenity....but setting these restrictions lower rather than higher....because society contains very different groups and I'm more socially liberal than not. If people are banding together to cause violence I most definitely want the Police to intervene in that....that's what taxes are for. If people are banding together to protest something then I have zero problem with that.....as long as they aren't smashing windows or physically involving themselves it's a healthy display of democracy. Of course if one group of morons rush you then self defence is valid. However, placing yourself in their path is deliberately setting up a fight. I'm aware that my stance kind of inhibits revolution....it's essentially protecting the establishment when sometimes the establishment is far from ideal. However I watched a clip on TV a while back where they were in Russia interviewing some guy on the street about revolution and he said, 'good rarely comes from revolutions'......he's right...normally you are replacing one set of arseholes with another set of arseholes with different priorities....It's just a different set of people lined up against the wall. Better to reform the arseholes you have.....though I recognise that this isn't always possible....so context for every situation is relevant. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Aug 2017 3.43pm) I agree with you Stirling. Revolutions almost inevitably set back populations and destroy value. But it isn't revolution I was talking about, it was controlled pressure brought to bear to prevent an opposing viewpoint from rolling out unassailed. Goodness knows this has currency right now. You have to avoid unaligned people from tacitly supporting extremists and making them ever bolder. I watched Harry Potter last night, I know what I am talking about. I worked in Romania just after Ceausescu was shot. It was weird how, having 'terminated' his family the population voted in his old cronies. When I asked why I was told because they were the only people who had a clue how things worked. They were tolerated for a while in the name of reconstruction.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 21 Aug 17 4.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The Nick of old use to be less conflict and more interested in discussion .....ok not as much as some but it was there. He's more Wolfe Smith now but it's all part of the Hol diaspora. There are plenty of cerebral left of centre commentators for discussion and trading of ideas... though we don't have many centralists....and you get your Kermits and Nicks for your rows and rants. We all know we get worse. Gotta agree with you again. But I do think Nick getting more hardline coincided with one or two people becoming more hard line vocal on the other wing and - indeed - taking themselves more seriously.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Aug 17 4.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Gotta agree with you again. But I do think Nick getting more hardline coincided with one or two people becoming more hard line vocal on the other wing and - indeed - taking themselves more seriously. Indeed.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Aug 17 4.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I agree with you Stirling. Revolutions almost inevitably set back populations and destroy value. But it isn't revolution I was talking about, it was controlled pressure brought to bear to prevent an opposing viewpoint from rolling out unassailed. Goodness knows this has currency right now. You have to avoid unaligned people from tacitly supporting extremists and making them ever bolder. I watched Harry Potter last night, I know what I am talking about. I worked in Romania just after Ceausescu was shot. It was weird how, having 'terminated' his family the population voted in his old cronies. When I asked why I was told because they were the only people who had a clue how things worked. They were tolerated for a while in the name of reconstruction.
Working in Romania round about then must have been interesting. I've seen orgies on snooker tables and tragically planes fly into buildings....but I know bugger all about Romania....is it true that the women are hairier over there?....mustaches and all that?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 21 Aug 17 4.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Working in Romania round about then must have been interesting. I've seen orgies on snooker tables and tragically planes fly into buildings....but I know bugger all about Romania....is it true that the women are hairier over there?....mustaches and all that? Therein lies many a tale. Due to fog, the one and only modern Tarom plane got stuck in Romania so they flew in an old Ilyushin from another airfield. It seems they also flew in the normal air stewardesses. Far more impressive moustaches than I could muster and meat with the texture and taste of Doc Martin's boot tongues after a four day festival. On the other hand Romanian girls had a habit of wearing incredibly short skirts and many were really attractive. None as attractive as Slovakians though, they are truly the chosen race.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.