Day of Rage

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Day of Rage

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 24 of 26 < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 23 Jun 17 11.10pm
Originally posted by Cucking Funt Urban Planning bender Weren't Hamas the originators of urban planning?
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 23 Jun 17 11.10pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Urban Planning bender

Weren't Hamas the originators of urban planning?

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 23 Jun 17 11.41pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 I'm with you you Simon and your golf course critique. Nail on head. There's on ejust down the river from Richmond and massive it is too. Could probably house 5,000 if built upon. Good social housing too. Would p1ss off 300 rich golfers so maybe it isn't such a good idea. Golf courses are often very important nature reserves as well. Building on them is an act of barbarism. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 23 Jun 17 11.41pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

I'm with you you Simon and your golf course critique. Nail on head. There's on ejust down the river from Richmond and massive it is too. Could probably house 5,000 if built upon. Good social housing too. Would p1ss off 300 rich golfers so maybe it isn't such a good idea.

Golf courses are often very important nature reserves as well. Building on them is an act of barbarism.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 23 Jun 17 11.44pm
Originally posted by Cucking Funt Golf courses are often very important nature reserves as well. Building on them is an act of barbarism. Couples shagging in the 15th bunker should not count as 'nature'. Although my 22 year old self would strongly disagree Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 23 Jun 17 11.44pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Golf courses are often very important nature reserves as well. Building on them is an act of barbarism.

Couples shagging in the 15th bunker should not count as 'nature'.

Although my 22 year old self would strongly disagree

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 23 Jun 17 11.49pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 Couples shagging in the 15th bunker should not count as 'nature'. Although my 22 year old self would strongly disagree Was your club wood or irn bru?
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 23 Jun 17 11.49pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

Couples shagging in the 15th bunker should not count as 'nature'.

Although my 22 year old self would strongly disagree

Was your club wood or irn bru?

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 23 Jun 17 11.54pm
Originally posted by nickgusset Oh yes I remember the promise of 'down to the tens of thousands'. Now who was it said that? Edit: [Link] Rosetta are you better are you Well well well. Some posters might view these figures with surprise. Edited by nickgusset (23 Jun 2017 10.21pm) ONS must have got it wrong, then. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 23 Jun 17 11.54pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Oh yes I remember the promise of 'down to the tens of thousands'. Now who was it said that?

Edit: [Link]
Rosetta are you better are you
Well well well. Some posters might view these figures with surprise.

Edited by nickgusset (23 Jun 2017 10.21pm)

ONS must have got it wrong, then.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Jun 17 5.25am
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman For nearly 15 years they should've built that many and never came close (I remember having this opinion before it was bigger news) yet you think it's going to start happening. Then there's the people who should've been housed in those years on top of the houses needed going forward. I'm afraid youre in denial my friend. Because if they built enough to supply demand, the consequence would be to deflate and possibly collapse the housing market - which would have a severe economic effect on top of being an election loser. Residential property shouldn't really be an investment in the way it has become. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 24 Jun 17 5.25am

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

For nearly 15 years they should've built that many and never came close (I remember having this opinion before it was bigger news) yet you think it's going to start happening. Then there's the people who should've been housed in those years on top of the houses needed going forward. I'm afraid youre in denial my friend.

Because if they built enough to supply demand, the consequence would be to deflate and possibly collapse the housing market - which would have a severe economic effect on top of being an election loser.

Residential property shouldn't really be an investment in the way it has become.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 24 Jun 17 9.13am
Originally posted by simonmdt Of course it is. And I do have an idea as how high the rate of building would have to be to keep pace. With the population growing at a rate of 500k per year and the average number of people per dwelling currently being 2.4 that's just over 200k new homes per year Hardly uncontrollable. But you carry on making a fool of yourself 148k houses were completed last year. Your figures ar too simplistic. They don't take into account demand from existing population. More importantly, do you know how much more infrastructure will be required year on year and the stress it puts on local communities. It cannot continue at this rate.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

24 Jun 17 9.13am

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by simonmdt

Of course it is.

And I do have an idea as how high the rate of building would have to be to keep pace.

With the population growing at a rate of 500k per year and the average number of people per dwelling currently being 2.4 that's just over 200k new homes per year

Hardly uncontrollable. But you carry on making a fool of yourself

148k houses were completed last year.

Your figures ar too simplistic. They don't take into account demand from existing population. More importantly, do you know how much more infrastructure will be required year on year and the stress it puts on local communities. It cannot continue at this rate.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 24 Jun 17 9.16am
Originally posted by simonmdt Would you, or your little chum, Cucking Funt like to educate me of what it is I don't understand? I think I understand the pair of you very well. That's nice. You clearly don't understand why the British population is increasing. It ain't 'cause of old people chief.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

24 Jun 17 9.16am

Originally posted by simonmdt

Would you, or your little chum, Cucking Funt like to educate me of what it is I don't understand?

I think I understand the pair of you very well.

That's nice.

You clearly don't understand why the British population is increasing. It ain't 'cause of old people chief.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 24 Jun 17 9.21am
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Because if they built enough to supply demand, the consequence would be to deflate and possibly collapse the housing market - which would have a severe economic effect on top of being an election loser. Residential property shouldn't really be an investment in the way it has become. It's a difficult balancing act and first time buyers are getting the wrong end of the privy stick
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

24 Jun 17 9.21am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Residential property shouldn't really be an investment in the way it has become.

It's a difficult balancing act and first time buyers are getting the wrong end of the privy stick

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 24 Jun 17 9.25am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger That's nice. You clearly don't understand why the British population is increasing. It ain't 'cause of old people chief. Yet another problem with the selfish old gs is that they are not dying on time as they used to, if the government were to cancel brexit there would be no need for them to hang on any longer. Hence freeing up property and strain on public services at a stroke**.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 24 Jun 17 9.25am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

That's nice.

You clearly don't understand why the British population is increasing. It ain't 'cause of old people chief.

Yet another problem with the selfish old g**s is that they are not dying on time as they used to, if the government were to cancel brexit there would be no need for them to hang on any longer.

Hence freeing up property and strain on public services at a stroke.

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 24 Jun 17 9.41am
Originally posted by steeleye20 Yet another problem with the selfish old gs is that they are not dying on time as they used to, if the government were to cancel brexit there would be no need for them to hang on any longer. Hence freeing up property and strain on public services at a stroke**. Put some cladding on old folks homes? We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 24 Jun 17 9.41am

Originally posted by steeleye20

Yet another problem with the selfish old g**s is that they are not dying on time as they used to, if the government were to cancel brexit there would be no need for them to hang on any longer.

Hence freeing up property and strain on public services at a stroke.

Put some cladding on old folks homes?

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post