This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 14 Nov 19 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jway89
To be honest, I don't think he even knows what he wants to do. The neo liberal right have been in charge of the Tory party for generations. Since Thatcher moved the economy into more of a service industry than s manufacturing one....(which was common sense, if harshly implemented)...the Tories have used immigration labour for wage suppression and increased GDP via population growth. However, Tory immigration figures before Blair's new Labour were around 50,000 a year.....Blair enabled 300,000 a year and the Tories that came after him....did little to change it....they lied about it as much as Blair did. They both play the 'globalisation card' and pretend that it's inevitable rather than a political decision. It's the easy method for short term results....which is what drives a democratic politician. Long term it's a disaster.....immigrants get old too. We are twice as crowded as Germany and three times as crowded as France and we have automation coming. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Nov 2019 1.37pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Deleted11 14 Nov 19 1.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The neo liberal right have been in charge of the Tory party for generations. Since Thatcher moved the economy into more of a service industry than s manufacturing one....(which was common sense, if harshly implemented)...the Tories have used immigration labour for wage suppression and increased GDP via population growth. However, Tory immigration figures before Blair's new Labour were around 50,000 a year.....Blair enabled 300,000 a year and the Tories that came after him....did little to change it....they lied about it as much as Blair did. It's the easy method for short term results....which is what drives a democratic politician. Long term it's a disaster.....immigrants get old too. We are twice as crowded as Germany and three times as crowded as France and we have automation coming. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Nov 2019 1.35pm) So, who is there to vote for to change this? Hence, there's a reason it's a parliamentary democracy and not a direct one.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Nov 19 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jway89
So, who is there to vote for to change this? Hence, there's a reason it's a parliamentary democracy and not a direct one. It's not going to change. Voting Tory, for a form of Brexit, is for a principle......Long term this country is completely fecked and they are all complicit. Since 2016 EU migration has fallen but it's still net...meaning more come than go....Non EU migration has risen...and that's because of the reasons I stated previously. It's the 'no brainer' method they use for short term results. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Nov 2019 1.47pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 14 Nov 19 1.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jway89
To be honest, I don't think he even knows what he wants to do. For Labour it's about getting more voters (along with allowing migrants and EU citizens to vote, reducing the voting age etc) they know it will work in their favour as immigrants will vote for more social care, free housing and benefits increases etc. That's a reality not a "right wing talking point" as you might be told by the BBC or the Guardian etc. The LibFems, SNP, Welsh, Greens etc are all socialists so go along with this. For the Tories it's about (1) driving down the cost of labor for their big business mates but perhaps more importantly (2) Artificially keeping property prices inflated through housing shortage as the whole economy currently depends on this. So basically, the whole lot need to go.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Deleted11 14 Nov 19 3.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
For Labour it's about getting more voters (along with allowing migrants and EU citizens to vote, reducing the voting age etc) they know it will work in their favour as immigrants will vote for more social care, free housing and benefits increases etc. That's a reality not a "right wing talking point" as you might be told by the BBC or the Guardian etc. The LibFems, SNP, Welsh, Greens etc are all socialists so go along with this. For the Tories it's about (1) driving down the cost of labor for their big business mates but perhaps more importantly (2) Artificially keeping property prices inflated through housing shortage as the whole economy currently depends on this. So basically, the whole lot need to go. To be honest, when you hear some of the arguments from Leave and Remain, it does make me wonder why the voting age isn't reduced to 4 years old. I do think there is stuff you can do to bring about a more cohesive society, but, when you frame political discourse as if you are in an Oxbridge debating club rather than looking at basic data and information, you, imo, destroy a decent democracy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 14 Nov 19 3.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Not sure about that bit. I think Corbyn is sincere in wanting to hep the lower pay but all the while Labour have an open door immigration policy they are in conflict with each other. Basic supply and demand. Our minimum wage is about the same as France and Germany - defence is Labours' weak suit in my view.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Nov 19 4.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chris123
Our minimum wage is about the same as France and Germany - defence is Labours' weak suit in my view. Mass immigration is what everyone should be talking about.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Deleted11 14 Nov 19 4.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Mass immigration is what everyone should be talking about. If that's the case, then it's unlikely to be talked about.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Nov 19 4.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jway89
If that's the case, then it's unlikely to be talked about. Exactly. We are wedged between greed and ambition and the left wing media are happy to support it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 14 Nov 19 4.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Mass immigration is what everyone should be talking about. I think you talk about it enough for all of us.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Deleted11 14 Nov 19 4.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Exactly. We are wedged between greed and ambition and the left wing media are happy to support it. It's a mixture, right? I'd say 90% of mainstream newspapers are right leaning. The BBC gets slated and I would say it is left leaning, but the take home point of all this is that the arguments are always on feelings and ideologies, which basically turns into a 'you're a racist, no you're a snowflake'. Just by reading the posts on these threads, people have a very limited understanding of how money works, thinking that austerity was absolutely necessary and comparing a country with it's own currency to Bob and Phil down the road who go to work everyday. Now, I'm not saying they are ignorant, but what I will say is that their views are largely dictated by the literature they read, which is based on their bias and newspapers like the Daily Mail, which, in my mind is an absolute disgrace of a newspaper, feed people crap without being questioned on it. So, if something like economics, which can be looked up and explained pretty easily isn't done right by the media, what hope do we have?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Nov 19 5.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jway89
It's a mixture, right? I'd say 90% of mainstream newspapers are right leaning. The BBC gets slated and I would say it is left leaning, but the take home point of all this is that the arguments are always on feelings and ideologies, which basically turns into a 'you're a racist, no you're a snowflake'. Just by reading the posts on these threads, people have a very limited understanding of how money works, thinking that austerity was absolutely necessary and comparing a country with it's own currency to Bob and Phil down the road who go to work everyday. Now, I'm not saying they are ignorant, but what I will say is that their views are largely dictated by the literature they read, which is based on their bias and newspapers like the Daily Mail, which, in my mind is an absolute disgrace of a newspaper, feed people crap without being questioned on it. So, if something like economics, which can be looked up and explained pretty easily isn't done right by the media, what hope do we have? 90%?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.