This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Penge Eagle Beckenham 09 May 19 5.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I can walk and chew gum at the same time. As Stirlingsays often retorts - the world is not black and white. My distaste for the commander in cheat doesnt mean I bow down at the altar of every democrat. You are confusing me with Lindsey Graham in reverse. Before Trump became President, he called him a Jackass and Idiot (which he still is). Since he became President, Lindsey has backed him all the way. Rand Paul slated Trump before he became president. Since then? Just a bit different. Yesterday we saw a GOP controlled senate committee subpoena Trump Jr. Do you know why that happened? Because Richard Burr is not up for reelection. Its literally that simple. Republicans like Flake who were/are not up for re-election feel ok to actually do their f&cking jobs and scrutinize the executive. If a GOP candidate is up for re-election, they disgrace themselves and lie. Its simple really. Every spineless, cowardly invertebrate republican that is in an election cycle, is so scared of Trump's twitter feed that they would support him if he did eventually murder someone on 5th avenue. The GOP has totally sold out and has disgraced itself in supporting and enabling Trump's childlike behavior. It has completely sold itself out and abandoned long held principles that people like John McCain took so seriously for so long. Democrats are not perfect, but next to the spineless GOP cowards who prop up Trump, they pretty much are. Racism is a cancer on the world, and should not be tolerated ever, in any way shape or form. I am not a "man of high morals" I just find Trump's moral makeup to be about the same as that of a used car salesman. So you think it's OK for the Democrat Ralph Northam to remain in office? There are bad people on both sides of the aisle, so to just demonise Republicans is being utterly dishonest. Re Lindsey Graham, you are saying someone can't change their mind? Many people in the GOP – and the world – feared the worse when Trump was elected and he has since proved many wrong. If morals mattered, then there would hardly be any politicians left! You can only attack Trump's morals – f*** me it's low hanging fruit – because you are unable to attack his winning economic polices. Edited by Penge Eagle (09 May 2019 5.46pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Stirlingsays 09 May 19 6.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Campaign finance violations are serious enough that Cohen is going to jail, in part, for this crime. As for obstruction of justice this is a very serious crime when a President interferes in investigations of his own potential misdeeds. Both are serious enough to go to trial and be thrown in jail over. Biden is no angel, I am actually not his biggest fan, but in terms of getting the Trump clown show over and done with next year, he is the best bet the dems have. Unless there has been some defrauding going on I don't regard 'campaign finance violations ' as serious as all politicians are bought and sold anyway. As for obstruction.....that is a joke. I wholly agree with the President's attitude towards the movement to get rid of him. He should give them nothing and make their job as hard as possible. He was lied about and we had a twenty to thirty million dollar investigation to prove the lies. Now investigations will proceed into the liars. It's undemocratic to try to unseat a president outside of an election and as your attitude and words have implied on here.....they will do anything they can. I regard the movement to unseat Trump exactly as I regarded the movement to unseat Clinton and indeed Obama.....I view it very dimly indeed. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 May 2019 6.05pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Maine Eagle USA 09 May 19 6.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
So you think it's OK for the Democrat Ralph Northam to remain in office? There are bad people on both sides of the aisle, so to just demonise Republicans is being utterly dishonest. Re Lindsey Graham, you are saying someone can't change their mind? Many people in the GOP – and the world – feared the worse when Trump was elected and he has since proved many wrong. If morals mattered, then there would hardly be any politicians left! You can only attack Trump's morals – f*** me it's low hanging fruit – because you are unable to attack his winning economic polices. Edited by Penge Eagle (09 May 2019 5.46pm) Northam should have stepped down. I wanted to talk policies and get intellectual Penge Eagle, but in the end you bottled it. His Chinese trade war is just fantastic economic thinking. Tariffs and trade wares are great ideas. Perhaps soy bean farmers might disagree. Trump looks at economics in possibly a less sophisticated way than a 3 year old. In reality he personally cannot impact the economy that much, except with his bizarre public rants, such as the one he just made about China in the Roosevelt Room in another one of his bizarre rambling rant press conferences that aren't actually press conferences. Change their mind? I know you are not that thick, Penge Eagle. Trump is just the same as he was before he was elected, he is still a jackass and idiot. What changed is people like Paul and Graham had to decide to bend over and take a beef injection from Trump to keep their cushy jobs and salaries. They put their dignity and morality aside, to keep their jobs. "Bad people on both sides" There you go again little Donald! Next you will be calling for John Kerry to be prosecuted under the Logan act, which your idol Big Donald just barked out at the White House.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 09 May 19 6.04pm | |
---|---|
On a broader front it does raise the question of how anyone will qualify for public office in the future now social media and cameras are so ubiquitous.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Maine Eagle USA 09 May 19 6.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
As for obstruction.....that is a joke. I wholly agree with the President's attitude towards the movement to get rid of him. He should give them nothing and make their job as hard as possible. He was lied about and we had a twenty to thirty million dollar investigation to prove the lies. Now investigations will proceed into the liars. It's undemocratic to try to unseat a president outside of an election and as your attitude and words have implied on here.....they will do anything they can. I regard the movement to unseat Trump exactly as I regarded the movement to unseat Clinton and indeed Obama.....I view it very dimly indeed. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 May 2019 6.05pm) Sorry, Stirlingsays, but I dont think you have quite grasped the campaign finance issue. There was defrauding going on. PBS put it well: Prosecutors said the purpose of the hush payments was to influence the 2016 election, and treated them as campaign contributions, which are subject to restrictions under the Federal Election Campaign Act. Cohen’s payment to Clifford, they said, exceeded the $2,700 limit on personal contributions to a single candidate for an election. The payment he helped arrange for McDougal flouted the ban on corporations contributing directly to campaigns. That is fraud and is illegal. Its legality is not in question, as Cohen is already in JAIL for this!! Regarding obstruction, over 700 former federal prosecutors (from both sides of the aisle) have publicly stated that Trump clearly committed multiple counts of felony obstruction, and if he was not protected by DOJ rules, he would already be charged. Much as I respect ex-teachers from Wisbech on matter of US law, I think I will go with the 700 former federal prosecutors.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 May 19 6.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Sorry, Stirlingsays, but I dont think you have quite grasped the campaign finance issue. There was defrauding going on. PBS put it well: Prosecutors said the purpose of the hush payments was to influence the 2016 election, and treated them as campaign contributions, which are subject to restrictions under the Federal Election Campaign Act. Cohen’s payment to Clifford, they said, exceeded the ,700 limit on personal contributions to a single candidate for an election. The payment he helped arrange for McDougal flouted the ban on corporations contributing directly to campaigns. That is fraud and is illegal. Its legality is not in question, as Cohen is already in JAIL for this!! Regarding obstruction, over 700 former federal prosecutors (from both sides of the aisle) have publicly stated that Trump clearly committed multiple counts of felony obstruction, and if he was not protected by DOJ rules, he would already be charged. Much as I respect ex-teachers from Wisbech on matter of US law, I think I will go with the 700 former federal prosecutors. Paying brass to shut up being called fraud? Na, pure legalese waffle.....no different to calling the touching of a shoulder as assault. Trump can bang as much brass as he likes and pay them what he wants, it's between him and his wife.....and other mistresses. If the press find out then cool....that's the price he pays, but using it to try and unseat him? Well, the public laughed at it and I laugh at it....only moralistic blowhards take it seriously and half of them are hypocrites. As for what Cohen did.....Sorry but that just gets a big shrug from me. You just support unethical attempts to unseat an elected president for legalese. Like I said, I didn't support it for Clinton and I don't support it for Trump.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 09 May 19 8.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I wanted to talk policies and get intellectual Penge Eagle, but in the end you bottled it. You still can, what's stopping you? Over 90% of your posts on Trump are attacking his character. All because you cannot attack his economic policies that are working and the US economy is booming!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 09 May 19 8.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Racism is a cancer on the world, and should not be tolerated ever, in any way shape or form. I am not a "man of high morals" I just find Trump's moral makeup to be about the same as that of a used car salesman. 10 Questions Joe Biden Needs to Answer About His Views on Race [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 May 19 11.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Except I'm not referring about his tweets... (I actually think he should stop tweeting, sit back and watch the Dems implode for 2020). I'm talking about your hyperbolic post of no evidence to support it. Facts over feelings. Do you have evidence Trump has committed adultery while in office? Has Trump been convicted of anything in a criminal court? If no to both, then you are a smear merchant. You obviously don't believe in due process and the rule of law. Edited by Penge Eagle (09 May 2019 5.07pm) I am not referring though to things like adultery whilst in office am I? Indeed I said that such things are not really relevant. They are just the context around a man's character. Nor am I referring to him ever being convicted. Although he has been indicted many times he has either always settled out of Court or spent big money on attorneys to find ways to mount a legal defence. Of course I believe in due process and the rule of law and want to see it applied to everyone. Presidents included. Ex-Presidents already are as we will all find out in due course. What I referring to is his public behaviour in which he repeatedly lies, insults in childish terms anyone who criticises, attempts to wind up his "base" with ridiculous rhetoric and generally run the Presidency in a way which demands personal loyalty rather than loyalty to the country. In addition I was referring to your assertion that the Mueller report hasn't "nailed him" when the jury is clearly still out on that, despite the attempts of his supporters to whitewash him and sweep it under the carpet. There is a lot of water yet to pass under the bridge before that "case is closed", however much the GOP try to wish it away. There is no need to smear Donald Trump. He manages to cover himself in the brown stuff perfectly well all on his own. The problem is that some people seem to either like that smell, or not be aware where it is coming from. Anyone who cannot see that having Trump as the POTUS is both a clear and present danger to the USA, and the rest of the world, but also a dangerous example to other wanna be dictators needs to stop trying to defend the indefensible and do some quiet reappraisal.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 09 May 19 11.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am not referring though to things like adultery whilst in office am I? Indeed I said that such things are not really relevant. They are just the context around a man's character. Nor am I referring to him ever being convicted. Although he has been indicted many times he has either always settled out of Court or spent big money on attorneys to find ways to mount a legal defence. Of course I believe in due process and the rule of law and want to see it applied to everyone. Presidents included. Ex-Presidents already are as we will all find out in due course. What I referring to is his public behaviour in which he repeatedly lies, insults in childish terms anyone who criticises, attempts to wind up his "base" with ridiculous rhetoric and generally run the Presidency in a way which demands personal loyalty rather than loyalty to the country. In addition I was referring to your assertion that the Mueller report hasn't "nailed him" when the jury is clearly still out on that, despite the attempts of his supporters to whitewash him and sweep it under the carpet. There is a lot of water yet to pass under the bridge before that "case is closed", however much the GOP try to wish it away. There is no need to smear Donald Trump. He manages to cover himself in the brown stuff perfectly well all on his own. The problem is that some people seem to either like that smell, or not be aware where it is coming from. Anyone who cannot see that having Trump as the POTUS is both a clear and present danger to the USA, and the rest of the world, but also a dangerous example to other wanna be dictators needs to stop trying to defend the indefensible and do some quiet reappraisal. So after digesting all this hyperbolic waffle... The Meuller Report cleared Trump of Russia collusion. Fact. You are unable to back up any of your smears with evidence. Can you explain how Trump "is a clear and present danger to the USA, and the rest of the world"? Maybe you should take some TDS pills also.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Maine Eagle USA 10 May 19 1.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Paying brass to shut up being called fraud? Na, pure legalese waffle.....no different to calling the touching of a shoulder as assault. As for what Cohen did.....Sorry but that just gets a big shrug from me. You just support unethical attempts to unseat an elected president for legalese. Like I said, I didn't support it for Clinton and I don't support it for Trump.
Deliberately missing the point? It’s not about having affairs and making hush money payments. It’s about clearly violating well established campaign finance statutes. That is the law of the land. It’s legality is not in question as Cohen is going to jail for the crime I speak of. It is a crime, and people go to jail for crimes. It’s simple really. You also seem to be ignoring the fact that (now 800) democrat and republican former federal prosecutors have opined that trump would clearly be already charged with felony obstruction if he wasn’t protected by DOJ rules about indicting the president. That is a crime, and people go to jail for crimes. You can try to make breaking the law sound trivial or somehow acceptable, but it’s not ok in modern societies. Once again Stirlingsays, your viewpoint is your own right, but now 800 former federal prosecutors disagree with you. That fact should probably make you think twice, don’t you think? Edited by Maine Eagle (10 May 2019 1.57am)
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Maine Eagle USA 10 May 19 1.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
You still can, what's stopping you? Over 90% of your posts on Trump are attacking his character. All because you cannot attack his economic policies that are working and the US economy is booming! Indulging in some selective replying I see. I already addressed a matter of policy but you seem unwilling to respond. Trump is engineering a trade war with China and has called himself a “tariff man”. Is that a sound economic strategy, Penge Eagle?
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.