This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Jun 23 11.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Like the Iraqi Supergun and Westland helicopter affairs. Loads of integrity. Do you think either Thatcher or Heseltine were corruptly involved in them? Arms dealing is a murky world and determining what actions support British interests not always made visible but I don't believe either were corrupt.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 20 Jun 23 12.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Do you think either Thatcher or Heseltine were corruptly involved in them? Arms dealing is a murky world and determining what actions support British interests not always made visible but I don't believe either were corrupt. Yes, both were directly involved.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 20 Jun 23 12.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Both Heseltine and Thatcher had integrity. Something completely absent in Johnson. I despise the drift toward populism as any kind of substitute for responsible politics and am delighted to see it failing so quickly. I hope the Tories regain their sense of decency and realise that their job isn't just to win elections. It's to serve us and if they don't we will dump them. It's taken too long for the electorate to wake up to the confidence trick that's been played on them, but they have. Now they must change and Heseltine has put his finger on it.
If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point. The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold. Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture. If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system. Sadly, it fails on many levels.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 20 Jun 23 1.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point. The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold. Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture. If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system. Sadly, it fails on many levels. I think we can all agree that no system is perfect. Off the top of my head, there were even problems with Utopia but I can't remember exactly what they are. I get the feeling not great on crime. And there was little about immigration.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 20 Jun 23 1.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point. The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold. Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture. If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system. Sadly, it fails on many levels. A large proportion of the political class and civil servants are morons. The majority of the electorate don't concern themselves with the minutiae of politics. They do recognise incompetence and policies that are against their interests. As much of what government does is both of those things, they should vote for parties with the shortest manifestos, who propose the least governing and who aim to bin as much unnecessary law and regulations as possible.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Jun 23 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Yes, both were directly involved. Aware? Probably. Involved, I doubt, but am willing to be proved wrong. I cannot recall either facing charges let alone being convicted.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 20 Jun 23 1.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Aware? Probably. Involved, I doubt, but am willing to be proved wrong. I cannot recall either facing charges let alone being convicted. Have even the most closed minded look at any of the more recent findings on these 'affairs'. You're right that people should have been convicted. In the Arms to Iraq trials anyone who was convicted had their convictions overturned and received compensation payouts - turned out the government had in effect sanctioned the sales. The government was Thatcher. The MOD and MI6 had both used their influence to continue the sales, whilst some individuals pocketed some money. It's not my opinion - the findings have been made in court.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 20 Jun 23 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Yes, both were directly involved. 100% on Westland, ISG not clear
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 20 Jun 23 1.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Not just you Owen. All those, usually on the right, who apply that lazy attack on Corbyn which I do not think is supported by fact. Indeed, I consider it odd that this is the standard stick of choice when there are much better sticks out there! On your main point, it is impossible to disagree. I imagine there are plenty of well meaning politicians whose only desire is to do best for all. They sit quietly on the back benches and loyally serve the needs of their constituents. However, to get any portfolio that is not nearly enough. You must have ambition and drive and that killer instinct. Primacy is given to self-service, service of party, service of dogma or any other service that is not serving us. They are the privileged, entitled dung sacks thrust before a mic to manfully defend the indefensible. That is all we see. That is how we judge. Who would not be cynical? We can have a civil debate , we are such dinosaurs
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Jun 23 2.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point. The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold. Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture. If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system. Sadly, it fails on many levels. We have been here before. It is a well understood, and very sensible, principle that the role of an MP, in a representative democracy like ours, is to represent us. Which doesn't mean they simply do what their electorate want. It would be impossible to determine that without running endless referendums to establish a consensus. MPs aren't the delegates of any group. They represent all of the people in their constituency and to do that they must use their own judgment. Our judgment ends when we choose them. Governments are not there to do what the people want on every issue. They do what the people want in that they represent us. If we don't like it, we change them.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 20 Jun 23 2.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
We have been here before. It is a well understood, and very sensible, principle that the role of an MP, in a representative democracy like ours, is to represent us. Which doesn't mean they simply do what their electorate want. It would be impossible to determine that without running endless referendums to establish a consensus. MPs aren't the delegates of any group. They represent all of the people in their constituency and to do that they must use their own judgment. Our judgment ends when we choose them. Governments are not there to do what the people want on every issue. They do what the people want in that they represent us. If we don't like it, we change them. In the age of identity politics changing them isn't as easy as it sounds.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 20 Jun 23 2.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
We have been here before. It is a well understood, and very sensible, principle that the role of an MP, in a representative democracy like ours, is to represent us. Which doesn't mean they simply do what their electorate want. It would be impossible to determine that without running endless referendums to establish a consensus. MPs aren't the delegates of any group. They represent all of the people in their constituency and to do that they must use their own judgment. Our judgment ends when we choose them. Governments are not there to do what the people want on every issue. They do what the people want in that they represent us. If we don't like it, we change them. Hardly a choice. Realistically, you currently only have bad or worse.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.