You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Post EU World
November 22 2024 8.54pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Post EU World

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 233 of 259 < 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 >

  

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 20 Jun 23 11.38am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Like the Iraqi Supergun and Westland helicopter affairs. Loads of integrity.

Do you think either Thatcher or Heseltine were corruptly involved in them?

Arms dealing is a murky world and determining what actions support British interests not always made visible but I don't believe either were corrupt.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 20 Jun 23 12.05pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Do you think either Thatcher or Heseltine were corruptly involved in them?

Arms dealing is a murky world and determining what actions support British interests not always made visible but I don't believe either were corrupt.

Yes, both were directly involved.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 20 Jun 23 12.35pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Both Heseltine and Thatcher had integrity. Something completely absent in Johnson. I despise the drift toward populism as any kind of substitute for responsible politics and am delighted to see it failing so quickly.

I hope the Tories regain their sense of decency and realise that their job isn't just to win elections. It's to serve us and if they don't we will dump them. It's taken too long for the electorate to wake up to the confidence trick that's been played on them, but they have. Now they must change and Heseltine has put his finger on it.

If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point.

The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold.

Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture.

If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system.

Sadly, it fails on many levels.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 20 Jun 23 1.03pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point.

The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold.

Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture.

If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system.

Sadly, it fails on many levels.

I think we can all agree that no system is perfect. Off the top of my head, there were even problems with Utopia but I can't remember exactly what they are. I get the feeling not great on crime. And there was little about immigration.
However, I think we can also say that most Western governments continue despite the people. They rely on the fact that there won't be any revolutions: and they're right.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 20 Jun 23 1.04pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point.

The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold.

Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture.

If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system.

Sadly, it fails on many levels.

A large proportion of the political class and civil servants are morons. The majority of the electorate don't concern themselves with the minutiae of politics. They do recognise incompetence and policies that are against their interests. As much of what government does is both of those things, they should vote for parties with the shortest manifestos, who propose the least governing and who aim to bin as much unnecessary law and regulations as possible.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 20 Jun 23 1.17pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Yes, both were directly involved.

Aware? Probably. Involved, I doubt, but am willing to be proved wrong. I cannot recall either facing charges let alone being convicted.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 20 Jun 23 1.37pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Aware? Probably. Involved, I doubt, but am willing to be proved wrong. I cannot recall either facing charges let alone being convicted.

Have even the most closed minded look at any of the more recent findings on these 'affairs'. You're right that people should have been convicted. In the Arms to Iraq trials anyone who was convicted had their convictions overturned and received compensation payouts - turned out the government had in effect sanctioned the sales. The government was Thatcher. The MOD and MI6 had both used their influence to continue the sales, whilst some individuals pocketed some money. It's not my opinion - the findings have been made in court.
In the Westland affair both Thatcher and Heseltine were involved but Thatcher used it as an excuse to get rid of Heseltine. Thatcher directly leaked the information, then had others take the blame and lied about it.
The one constant in both, surprise, surprise is Mark Thatcher. One day, it will all come out, but we'll be dead. It will make a good book.
Mark Thatcher had approached a South African intelligence officer/ arms dealer and set up a dummy US shell company to do the trading to Iraq as machine tools - along with several others. Mark Thatcher was also an executive director of Westland helicopters. Not that anyone wants to know.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Jun 23 1.52pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Yes, both were directly involved.

100% on Westland, ISG not clear

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Jun 23 1.53pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

Not just you Owen. All those, usually on the right, who apply that lazy attack on Corbyn which I do not think is supported by fact. Indeed, I consider it odd that this is the standard stick of choice when there are much better sticks out there!

On your main point, it is impossible to disagree. I imagine there are plenty of well meaning politicians whose only desire is to do best for all. They sit quietly on the back benches and loyally serve the needs of their constituents.

However, to get any portfolio that is not nearly enough. You must have ambition and drive and that killer instinct. Primacy is given to self-service, service of party, service of dogma or any other service that is not serving us. They are the privileged, entitled dung sacks thrust before a mic to manfully defend the indefensible.

That is all we see. That is how we judge. Who would not be cynical?

We can have a civil debate , we are such dinosaurs

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 20 Jun 23 2.06pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

If you mean by 'populism' the trend toward appearing to do what the electorate wants, then I agree to a point.

The problem is that in a democracy, what the people want is rather what it is all about. The problem is two fold.

Firstly, governments only appear to be doing what the people want rather than actually doing it, and secondly, a large part of the population are morons. That is not a reflection of their political leaning, but more their inability to understand even part of the bigger picture, or in some cases, any picture.

If politicians represented the best of us and were selfless, clever and efficient, then perhaps our Western illusion of democracy might be a perfect system.

Sadly, it fails on many levels.

We have been here before.

It is a well understood, and very sensible, principle that the role of an MP, in a representative democracy like ours, is to represent us. Which doesn't mean they simply do what their electorate want. It would be impossible to determine that without running endless referendums to establish a consensus. MPs aren't the delegates of any group. They represent all of the people in their constituency and to do that they must use their own judgment. Our judgment ends when we choose them.

Governments are not there to do what the people want on every issue. They do what the people want in that they represent us. If we don't like it, we change them.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 20 Jun 23 2.22pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

We have been here before.

It is a well understood, and very sensible, principle that the role of an MP, in a representative democracy like ours, is to represent us. Which doesn't mean they simply do what their electorate want. It would be impossible to determine that without running endless referendums to establish a consensus. MPs aren't the delegates of any group. They represent all of the people in their constituency and to do that they must use their own judgment. Our judgment ends when we choose them.

Governments are not there to do what the people want on every issue. They do what the people want in that they represent us. If we don't like it, we change them.

In the age of identity politics changing them isn't as easy as it sounds.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 20 Jun 23 2.35pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

We have been here before.

It is a well understood, and very sensible, principle that the role of an MP, in a representative democracy like ours, is to represent us. Which doesn't mean they simply do what their electorate want. It would be impossible to determine that without running endless referendums to establish a consensus. MPs aren't the delegates of any group. They represent all of the people in their constituency and to do that they must use their own judgment. Our judgment ends when we choose them.

Governments are not there to do what the people want on every issue. They do what the people want in that they represent us. If we don't like it, we change them.

Hardly a choice.

Realistically, you currently only have bad or worse.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 233 of 259 < 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Post EU World