Now you've done it..... wait for the Wissie repetitive post

We have been round this track 100 pages ago!

No Soros money is currently involved in funding "Best for Britain". An "Open Society" foundation he funds, but which operates independently, provided some seed funding and was immediately attacked for doing so in the right wing press, which is probably where you get these ideas.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It's a good question. The government did consider the evidence and decided that it was politically unwise to try to overturn the result but whether a legal challenge would have done so is obviously an open question. I don't know if it was even considered and if so what the conclusions reached were, but it did not reach a Court. Not yet anyway.

Complaining to the Electoral Commission would be a waste of time. Their role is small and very specific. They don't get involved in whether a campaign is legal or not, only if it's finances are correct.

There is nothing the least bit fake about a chart which details the trend of people's voting intentions flipping at the precise moment that fake claims by a campaign received widespread publicity, only to revert to their previous state a few months later.

It's pretty conclusive evidence of the impact. Not on devoted opponents of EU membership but on the swing voters. When only a 2% less of a swing would have reversed the result this was critical.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

On Saturday most supported remaining in the EU but not every day. They come from both sides of the argument.

My son in law has been there protesting. He works in the city, so goes after work and at weekends. People work shifts. Some are retired. There are many reasons how people can give up their time to protest.

Would I be there? To observe and listen. Maybe. Not to protest. I really don't see the point.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Many will admire her for having the courage of her convictions and doing what she believes to be right, despite the pressure and the prospect of losing her job as a consequence.

I would always vote for an MP of conviction rather then a lobby sheep, irrespective of whether or not I agreed with them on any particular issue.

Only time will tell whether there are enough people of principle in her constituency to return her again.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I fancy her, got to say.....

Bit of a dominatrix, hopefully