Oh you hate alright, even if you are in denial about it. You are blinded by hatred.

Of course, "white supremacist" is a term used by those who oppose them. They are unlikely to use it themselves, especially as they don't even recognise that's what they are.

A "supremacist" is someone who sees themselves, and people like themselves, as superior to those who aren't, on irrational grounds.

I am not so sure "Neema" doesn't consider himself "white". He is certainly a cheer leader for those who think racial difference is important.

I am aware of what he was, but his views changed sufficiently for him to lose his job because of them. Having found a niche to exploit in which to make money, he is now busy pandering to that sentiment. It has shades of Alex Jones, and others, in the USA, who milk the gullible by feeding them with their desire for confirmation of their biases.

That's what his "channel" is all about.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Your memory fails you. I said many times that I don't hate Trump. I feel sorry for him. No-one quite as awful as he is, can be a happy man. He has a personality defect so huge, it must be very difficult to ever have a true friend. What I hate is Trumpism, those people who manipulated him into the WH and allowed the enormous divide in the USA to be widened as a consequence.

Trump will eventually have to face justice, or confinement, if he survives for long enough.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I haven't looked into this, but I'd imagine we have 'war treaties' or suchlike with other countries which are reciprocal. So if the Ruskies invade Finland before they're fully in Nato, we're obliged to jump in, and then maybe that automatically triggers other countries to join in via their treaties with us? A theory.

Anyone reading your diatribes on Blair and Biden would be likely to conclude they are the result of hatred, because they don't make any sense otherwise. They take all the easy critical pickings, which anyone who actually holds responsibility provides, and mix them into irrational blasts from an irrational man, full of hatred.

That's not in my head. It's here, in your words. My mental health is fine.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Unfortunately this seals the deal. The only reason I even posted this is because you post absolutely anything going, often with zero accompanying info or verification of any kind to show Ukranians in a 'war crimes' light. When something with significant evidence to back it up in comparison (context, identification and footage wise) comes up displaying the patently obvious (that war crimes are clearly also, and often mainly, committed by aggressors in an invasion situation) you simply can't countenance that it could ever be real. "Position of shadows'.. I mean come on. And you wonder why the only war crime footage you say you've seen is Ukranian? You've answered your own question.

Edited by BlueJay (13 May 2022 2.21pm)

I'm not someone who thinks Russians are above war crimes as I think culturally these two people are similar and psychos are everywhere and emboldened by the brutality of war and its chaos.

However, anyone who claims they know the breakdown of war crimes is only speaking in their own capacity. No one actually knows. The best you can do is watch the footage of what is posted by both sides and take in reports on the ground from independent sources....not that many exist.

I'm someone who believes in the professionalism of European armies, eastern or not, and while I recognise that there are edge cases and unfortunate circumstances where people die. That said there is a big gap between that and deliberately murdering civilians or pows.

This is either the command structure of units being corrupted, state security elements or rogue or mercenary elements. Whichever side does this sick evil stuff it needs to be investigated and fair judgement made.....Do I think this will happen on either side? No.

This latest event however is receiving a lot of press. Perhaps this will get proper investigation. All the questions looked into and a conclusion reached. If what is reported is accurate I do indeed hope those soldiers are brought to justice.

What I will say is that anyone is serious about the truth of this war and is looking at footage of war crimes from more than just one side will understand that it isn't one sided by any stretch of the imagination.

I could put footage of Ukrainians knee cappings Russian pows who were left to die and who where humiliated while they died with their bodies reportedly burnt after it....we were told this would be investigated....yeah right.

I could link to where footage of a tied up Russian pow being knifed and then finally murdered with a knife through the eye into the brain....all complete with screams.....that stuff makes you very angry.

There are mass claims by citizens in the Donbas of Ukrainian civilians being fired on by Ukrainian troops.....there is certainly shelling of civilian areas by the Ukraine....even the UN have reported on that.

There is sick and twisted stuff in this war.....is it more sick than any other war....I doubt it but a lot of it has certainly been videoed.

You only get shown what the filters allow.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 May 2022 2.33pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)