Stop coming onto me.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I realise the anger is real but the practical difficulties are just too big for it to be a realistic prospect. More authority to each state maybe, but there is already a great deal. What else practically could there be.

The most obvious change seems to me to make sure that whoever wins the popular vote in a Presidential election wins the Presidency. Getting rid of the arcane electoral college system would ensure that actions taken at Federal level have the will of the majority behind them. Then they could move to weighting each vote in the Senate with the number of people living in each state, thus ensuring proper representation there too.

Once these things are done then whilst people may remain angry they will know their voices have been heard proportionately. It would still take some time and a concerted effort at educating people but it can be done.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

That produces a seriously unfunny, and extremely distasteful, image.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Is there that many, not sure. Personally I was surprised how many on here couldn’t accept the Brexit result ( and some still can’t)

Your chat up lines simply aren't going to work on me.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

There is a huge difference between what is happening in the USA and here over Brexit.

Objecting to the use of a referendum for party political purposes (to deal with the threat of UKIP) is a responsibility put on anyone who believes in Parliamentary democracy.

Trying to get Parliament to do their duty seems a task we all ought to support. Directly obstructing the necessary work involved in the transfer of power from one regime to the next is another.

Claiming that there has been foreign interference in a UK vote, when that interference has been identified by your own security services, is hardly a fraud. It's the truth. Claiming there is fraud without evidence is not the truth.

No-one in the UK is threatening violence or even a lack of co-operation over Brexit. Some are passionate about ensuring we achieve a "deal" that allows us to retain as many benefits as possible and to then move to trying to regain our membership and avoid the breakup of the UK.

That's all within the accepted norms of the UK political system. What is happening in the USA isn't. There it's all in uncharted waters.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.