This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
JRW2 Dulwich 18 Dec 23 12.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 55 years a fan
So All u f***ing panty wetters f*** off support another club Yes, the first 8 pages of this thread contained more pessimism, criticism of the manager, swearing and insulting of other posters than I can recall seeing. So in this season (allegedly) of goodwill I have composed these words to a well known carol: O come all ye moaners, joyless and defeatist,
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
palace99 New Mills 18 Dec 23 12.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by viveasheagle
With reference to the moans about Roy not giving the youngsters a chance he did play Franca as a sub along with some other youngsters and rightly bemoaned the lack of game changing effect they had in that game. Agree to an extent. Less than 2 weeks ago we played Bournemouth without 2 of our 3 normal midfielders. He played a CB, Richards, as a defensive midfielder. Ozoh is a natural DCM yet wasn't even on the bench. Not saying i would start the lad, but at least include him as one of 9 subs.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Croydon-Trucker 18 Dec 23 12.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JRW2
Yes, the first 8 pages of this thread contained more pessimism, criticism of the manager, swearing and insulting of other posters than I can recall seeing. So in this season (allegedly) of goodwill I have composed these words to a well known carol: O come all ye moaners, joyless and defeatist,
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The groover Danbury 18 Dec 23 1.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JRW2
Yes, the first 8 pages of this thread contained more pessimism, criticism of the manager, swearing and insulting of other posters than I can recall seeing. So in this season (allegedly) of goodwill I have composed these words to a well known carol: O come all ye moaners, joyless and defeatist,
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
JRW2 Dulwich 18 Dec 23 1.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker
80 - does it show?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Zimeagle Harare 18 Dec 23 1.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The groover
Just seen the highlights on sky. City's second is hand ball. It comes off a players elbow before being lashed in but they just looked at offside!!!! More big club bias to add to Edisons yellow. That was a straight red tackle to an outfield player so why not a keeper. Its becoming a joke now. Edited by The groover (17 Dec 2023 10.42pm) When the slow motion replay was shown just after the goal, it was so obvious that I thought VAR would overrule it. The ball came off the City player's arm ( Rodrigo? ) and fell to Lewis, who scored.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Dec 23 2.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Zimeagle
When the slow motion replay was shown just after the goal, it was so obvious that I thought VAR would overrule it. The ball came off the City player's arm ( Rodrigo? ) and fell to Lewis, who scored. On Ref Watch, Sky via Dermot Gallagher addressed the handball in the expected way; they didn't mention it. Dogso Gallagher did though say Ederson didn't deserve a red card because JPM was going away from, rather than toward, the goal.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
palace99 New Mills 18 Dec 23 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
On Ref Watch, Sky via Dermot Gallagher addressed the handball in the expected way; they didn't mention it. Dogso Gallagher did though say Ederson didn't deserve a red card because JPM was going away from, rather than toward, the goal. Ref watch - so pointless. Gallagher refuses to criticise a ref and agrees with 99% of decisions, or at least refuses to say they were wrong.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Croydon-Trucker 18 Dec 23 3.11pm | |
---|---|
You come across as being younger , much younger
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 18 Dec 23 3.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by palace99
Ref watch - so pointless. Gallagher refuses to criticise a ref and agrees with 99% of decisions, or at least refuses to say they were wrong. Gallagher, is a toddy for Sky.. But refereeing in this league stinks for me. The very notion of , clear and obvious, and the constant full back on, subjectivity, backed up by VAR,. Means there is an excuse for every event, and its amazing how the big teams seem to benefit . Pep was reasonably together at the end of the game,I sort of wondered why. Well the more you see the ball hit arm and on to Rico,, he knew he should have lost.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Dec 23 3.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by palace99
Ref watch - so pointless. Gallagher refuses to criticise a ref and agrees with 99% of decisions, or at least refuses to say they were wrong. The only reason to watch it is to see the contortions he goes through to explain the decisions. If all else fails he falls back on it being the ref's personal opinion which kind of negates the purpose of the programme.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Dec 23 3.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Putitout
Gallagher, is a toddy for Sky.. But refereeing in this league stinks for me. The very notion of , clear and obvious, and the constant full back on, subjectivity, backed up by VAR,. Means there is an excuse for every event, and its amazing how the big teams seem to benefit . Pep was reasonably together at the end of the game,I sort of wondered why. Well the more you see the ball hit arm and on to Rico,, he knew he should have lost. Maybe paranoid but what would the decision have been if the ball had hit Guehi in exactly the same place and been cleared?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.