Personally I would go with the professionals hmg employs. If it has to go back then I would go with it. Imo there are some very clever people employed to do what's best in our interests. Both for health and economical reasons. I have fortunately not been affected financially and but was amongst it when it was at its height, possibly around infected people by working in residential properties. If I were affected financially I may think different granted but I wasn't. How would you feel danh.

What professionals exactly? Sounds like you’re desperate to absolve the government of any blame whatsoever.

Personally, I’d be fuming, as should everyone. Mistakes are excusable, even more so in a fast changing, high pressure environment, but what is not forgivable is failing to learn from your mistakes. If June 21 gets pushed back it’s purely because of the spread of the Indian variant. A stringent border/quarantine policy that should have been put in place at the very start of this pandemic, and *still* isn’t would have kept us on track.

Cummins / Cummings

Too subtle?

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Correct.

Not trying to absolve anyone although I think we would still be in lockdown under labour which is my opinion on how they are more knee jerky than boris.
If deaths don't rise then there is no reason not to open up as planned. If this pandemic had a usable precident I would be firing off at hmg but it doesn't. Every one has had to be reactionary around the world. So if we had quarantined all visitors at what cost I might ask; we would be in a better place, guaranteed. Primarily though if people had stuck to the rules and also taken a jab when offered instead of refusing we would be in a better place as well. You have though proved the point i made on another post about nothing to the right is agreeable to you as you seem to think hmg doesn't have one professional.

We wouldn’t

We also would have had a firebreak instead of a third lockdown

Crises need firm and rapid responses