This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 21 Feb 19 3.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by LeeG
You've ignored my reasoning, true to form. I've answered your excuses.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 21 Feb 19 3.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by LeeG
I can, and I still do. But it's depressing seeing how regularly there's a "Foreigns bad, English good" style post riding high in the popular threads. As a result, I've started to come here less frequently. Pretty much all recent migrants I’ve met are great. I was recently surprised how well some Polish are doing here, and good luck to them all. I know they’re not all living many to a house but I was surprised at HOW WELL some are doing, and that’s great, but I’m also concerned of numbers and those that don’t want to meet or engage with you, and there will be a lot that won’t want to, no matter how good you think people generally are. In the pub last week there was a probably 50 something black lady who sounded just like the rest of us. She didn’t sound like a female version of Tinchie Stryder or the young lady on that annoying KFC advert trying to sound more ‘street’ or distance herself further from most of society, even if the advertising agency required her to, which is just as bad. I’ve seen a couple of young black men start acting up for no reason, thinking they’re not wanted in a white area. They didn’t sound street. That is frustrating, but it’s their choice. I’d guess all of us treat people how we find them, but have an opinion on how things are or are developing. That isn’t a crime. It’s concern. Hate speech is.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
LeeG London 21 Feb 19 4.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Pretty much all recent migrants I’ve met are great. I was recently surprised how well some Polish are doing here, and good luck to them all. I know they’re not all living many to a house but I was surprised at HOW WELL some are doing, and that’s great, but I’m also concerned of numbers and those that don’t want to meet or engage with you, and there will be a lot that won’t want to, no matter how good you think people generally are. In the pub last week there was a probably 50 something black lady who sounded just like the rest of us. She didn’t sound like a female version of Tinchie Stryder or the young lady on that annoying KFC advert trying to sound more ‘street’ or distance herself further from most of society, even if the advertising agency required her to, which is just as bad. I’ve seen a couple of young black men start acting up for no reason, thinking they’re not wanted in a white area. They didn’t sound street. That is frustrating, but it’s their choice. I’d guess all of us treat people how we find them, but have an opinion on how things are or are developing. That isn’t a crime. It’s concern. Hate speech is. Entirely fair. Can't really disagree with any of this. I never said you can't have concerns about immigration without being far-right. Obviously you can. Personally I don't think immigration should be one of this country's top worries but I can see some reasons it gives people concerns. That's understandable and I have no problem with people who air those concerns in a decent way.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Feb 19 4.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Pretty much all recent migrants I’ve met are great. I was recently surprised how well some Polish are doing here, and good luck to them all. I know they’re not all living many to a house but I was surprised at HOW WELL some are doing, and that’s great, but I’m also concerned of numbers and those that don’t want to meet or engage with you, and there will be a lot that won’t want to, no matter how good you think people generally are. In the pub last week there was a probably 50 something black lady who sounded just like the rest of us. She didn’t sound like a female version of Tinchie Stryder or the young lady on that annoying KFC advert trying to sound more ‘street’ or distance herself further from most of society, even if the advertising agency required her to, which is just as bad. I’ve seen a couple of young black men start acting up for no reason, thinking they’re not wanted in a white area. They didn’t sound street. That is frustrating, but it’s their choice. I’d guess all of us treat people how we find them, but have an opinion on how things are or are developing. That isn’t a crime. It’s concern. Hate speech is. Do you hear that Rudi? Your viewpoints have been deemed to be acceptable. You may pass go......But just watch yourself eh.....You don't want to post anything that might upset the self appointed moral authorities eh. Of course...... in another five years time.....What you might think about these issues might be up for further review no doubt.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
LeeG London 21 Feb 19 4.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Do you hear that Rudi? Your viewpoints have been deemed to be acceptable. You may pass go......But just watch yourself eh.....You don't want to post anything that might upset the self appointed moral authorities eh. Of course...... in another five years time.....What you might think about these issues might be up for further review no doubt. You may not pass go. Your views do not pass the test of the overseer. You must go immediately to moral prison. Truth be told, I bet you'll enjoy being a martyr for the cause. Tommy will probably do a fundraiser. You can even wear a yellow vest.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
blackheatheagle Beckenham 21 Feb 19 4.36pm | |
---|---|
As a newbie to the forum and an immigrant , i believe perception of generalization or terminologies triggers these debates as some find definitions offensive or usual. For eg, it is easy for me to be offended when i read a passage like `immigrant boosts the crime` or `we have too many immigrants`. There are multiple layers / segments / profiles who are immigrant thus this definition puts and mixes all in one basket and sounds labeling. However; from other perspective, not sure how practical it is to give a clear profile to avoid above? That will mean to give a paragraph of stats maybe while only highlighting possible impact of mass immigration on crime rates? I guess this is what deemed as political correctness and i am personally not fun of it. Perception of generalization and terminology also impact Brexit topic and not surprisingly even FA Cup vs EPL debate in Palace forum You can be treated like you don`t care EPL because you want FA Cup or you don`t care any trophy in order to secure £100 mil pound broadcast income I have been to several forums including football and this is a typical problem. Keyboard is cold and may sound bitter when we read and better to avoid taking so so seriously. My 2 cents.
Edited by blackheatheagle (21 Feb 2019 4.38pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Feb 19 5.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by LeeG
You may not pass go. Your views do not pass the test of the overseer. You must go immediately to moral prison. Truth be told, I bet you'll enjoy being a martyr for the cause. Tommy will probably do a fundraiser. You can even wear a yellow vest. I have been a contributor under the one same name for nearly ten years on the forum. Your views are welcome as representing a worldview and I have no objection to their airing. You won't find me trying to force your opinion off the site. However, while you are also welcome to debate me on any particular viewpoint. I won't be told what I should or shouldn't think because of your moral mores. You can call me and others an 'extremist' all you like. It doesn't make your opinion about that right and you can pass judgement all you like as well. It doesn't give you any authority. You judging Rudi's opinions as acceptable lays bare to any neutral observer on what is happening there. An attempt at enforcing your view of political correctness on others.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Feb 19 5.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by LeeG
The denial is a very strong part of it. Echo chambers are very dangerous. I agree it's important to challenge people to try and break down those echo chambers but it's an awful lot of effort when they are too far gone, as some here sadly seem to be. And as we've both said, it seems very odd that they come here, to a Crystal Palace forum, to air these views. It makes me wonder do they do the same in every single part of their lives? Own a motorbike - post about immigrants in the forum. It's all very odd, and the denial that they've gone off-map is a huge part of the problem. Firstly. This site s not an echo chamber. You are proving that right now. The only problem is that you are having a go at individuals and their right to have an opinion rather than debating a topic. It makes you sound like a spoilt child. The BBS is a click away if you want a site where everyone has to chant your preferred mantra or get banned. If you want to post on the political forum then argue your case instead of just repeating the same old tired rhetoric of the other handful of posters who think that disagreeing with them is a sin. In short. Put up or shut up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Feb 19 5.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by blackheatheagle
As a newbie to the forum and an immigrant , i believe perception of generalization or terminologies triggers these debates as some find definitions offensive or usual. For eg, it is easy for me to be offended when i read a passage like `immigrant boosts the crime` or `we have too many immigrants`. There are multiple layers / segments / profiles who are immigrant thus this definition puts and mixes all in one basket and sounds labeling. However; from other perspective, not sure how practical it is to give a clear profile to avoid above? That will mean to give a paragraph of stats maybe while only highlighting possible impact of mass immigration on crime rates? I guess this is what deemed as political correctness and i am personally not fun of it. Perception of generalization and terminology also impact Brexit topic and not surprisingly even FA Cup vs EPL debate in Palace forum You can be treated like you don`t care EPL because you want FA Cup or you don`t care any trophy in order to secure £100 mil pound broadcast income I have been to several forums including football and this is a typical problem. Keyboard is cold and may sound bitter when we read and better to avoid taking so so seriously. My 2 cents.
Edited by blackheatheagle (21 Feb 2019 4.38pm) Well, I hope you put in your 2 cents whenever you feel like it: whatever those views are. Whether that is on the football forums, general or the political ones.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Feb 19 5.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by LeeG
Personally I don't think immigration should be one of this country's top worries but I can see some reasons it gives people concerns. That's understandable and I have no problem with people who air those concerns in a decent way. But you have come on and made a load of generalisations without supporting them with any examples. Anyone can do that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 21 Feb 19 5.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by LeeG
I can, and I still do. But it's depressing seeing how regularly there's a "Foreigns bad, English good" style post riding high in the popular threads. As a result, I've started to come here less frequently. Ok then joan.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Feb 19 6.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by blackheatheagle
As a newbie to the forum and an immigrant , i believe perception of generalization or terminologies triggers these debates as some find definitions offensive or usual. For eg, it is easy for me to be offended when i read a passage like `immigrant boosts the crime` or `we have too many immigrants`. There are multiple layers / segments / profiles who are immigrant thus this definition puts and mixes all in one basket and sounds labeling. However; from other perspective, not sure how practical it is to give a clear profile to avoid above? That will mean to give a paragraph of stats maybe while only highlighting possible impact of mass immigration on crime rates? I guess this is what deemed as political correctness and i am personally not fun of it. Perception of generalization and terminology also impact Brexit topic and not surprisingly even FA Cup vs EPL debate in Palace forum You can be treated like you don`t care EPL because you want FA Cup or you don`t care any trophy in order to secure £100 mil pound broadcast income I have been to several forums including football and this is a typical problem. Keyboard is cold and may sound bitter when we read and better to avoid taking so so seriously. My 2 cents.
Edited by blackheatheagle (21 Feb 2019 4.38pm) Hello new person. Please come and join in the fun and know that everyone's opinion is welcome here. Anyone who disagrees should be banned.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.