This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
robdave2k 07 Oct 18 2.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by braunstoneagle
sounds like an awful plan to me...we would end up doing what spurs did after selling bale, just getting half as much due to the market being completely & utterly bonkers. i would rather stick to what we have, which is more than enough to be competative in this league Couldn’t agree more. Any market that values Schlupp at £12m is bonkers!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 07 Oct 18 2.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I didn't think Wolves were that impressive at all - I expected far more of them.Overall,on the balance of play I thought they were a tad fortunate to come way with all the points.We didn't do enough to win and I think a draw would have been a fairer result. Some very disapponting individual performances by both Schlupp and Townsend and AWB didn't have his best game as well.After Everton it is Arsenal,Chelsea, Tottenham and Man Utd and our prospects are certainly concerning for us all. Edited by Willo (07 Oct 2018 1.35pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
thai-eagle chiang mai 07 Oct 18 2.34pm | |
---|---|
Phuket-Eagle and Thai-Eagle watched the game together in a Patong (yes, we also saw those missed passes in last third) - and how we came away with nothing was beyond both of us.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 07 Oct 18 3.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by braunstoneagle
sounds like an awful plan to me...we would end up doing what spurs did after selling bale, just getting half as much due to the market being completely & utterly bonkers. i would rather stick to what we have, which is more than enough to be competative in this league
I would expect teams to bump prices up a lot and still run in to wage issue wilf is on what 130k so bringing in other quality wont be far of that and wage wise we are as you stated already using 80% of incoming money Edited by grumpymort (07 Oct 2018 3.21pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CB 07 Oct 18 4.11pm | |
---|---|
Sadly was unable to watch it but from the sounds of it we took a bit of time to let the handbrake off. Is that true? If so, similar to some of our other games (like Bournemouth) where it has taken going behind to get going. Does anyone thibk they players may be overthinking the shape / organisational side of things at first and then when they are chasing the game they are a bit less worried so just go for it and worry less about where they should stand etc?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davidpercival Croydon 07 Oct 18 4.27pm | |
---|---|
I was that ploner and I stand by my opinion. WB has been doing great for a youngster but his form has dipped badly and it doesn't do him any good to play him when he is getting robbed and caught out all the time. Young players are by and large inconsistent and the position we are in now we need the dependability of Ward. As someone on this thread said, you could play Ward at RB and WB to play further up (although I would thing that would be as a sub). At the moment WB is not a plus. Originally posted by Robk
Who was that plon..er who said that Wan Bissaka should be replaced by Ward.... wake up and smell the coffee...Amazing that Meyer was left out... I can’t quite get me head around that.....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Curlyeagle 2 Crowborogh 07 Oct 18 4.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I didn't think Wolves were that impressive at all - I expected far more of them.Overall,on the balance of play I thought they were a tad fortunate to come way with all the points.We didn't do enough to win and I think a draw would have been a fairer result. Some very disapponting individual performances by both Schlupp and Townsend and AWB didn't have his best game as well.After Everton it is Arsenal,Chelsea, Tottenham and Man Utd and our prospects are certainly concerning for us all. Edited by Willo (07 Oct 2018 1.35pm) Exactly how I felt after the game. Fully expected Wolves to dictate the play and have a majority of the possession.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 07 Oct 18 4.37pm | |
---|---|
I was expecting a more attacking intent from Wolves, instead, particularly in the early part of the game they were content to sit back, made little attempt to really press us and were content on playing on the break. We had a lot of the ball because of this but it was all played in front of the Wolves defence.With no target man we didn't play long balls forward but were more patient on our build up and played to feet but we never really 'Landed a glove' on the Wolves defence.Admittedly we had a couple of chances in the second half following a Meyer shot and a cut back from Ayew but in general it was hard to see us scoring.Zaha was shackled and when this happens we pose little threat at all.And I noticed Wolves pulled every player back to defend corners and we never looked a threat from them. At least some of the teams below us never picked up maximum points !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 07 Oct 18 4.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Curlyeagle 2
Exactly how I felt after the game. Fully expected Wolves to dictate the play and have a majority of the possession. He was tucked in quite narrow on the left with our main outlet on that side being PVA.Maybe the idea was to stop the right wing-back Doherty from marauding forward as he is prone to do and still leave cover in the central midfield areas. Schlupp was very disappointing.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
michaelpearce grays 07 Oct 18 5.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davidpercival
I was that ploner and I stand by my opinion. WB has been doing great for a youngster but his form has dipped badly and it doesn't do him any good to play him when he is getting robbed and caught out all the time. Young players are by and large inconsistent and the position we are in now we need the dependability of Ward. As someone on this thread said, you could play Ward at RB and WB to play further up (although I would thing that would be as a sub). At the moment WB is not a plus. glad someone read my post , my thinking is with someone who is very experienced defender with him on that side would make him less vulnerable and allow his natural flair come through going forward also he does have defensive skills,for me thats a win win,Townsend has left him on his own to often and not doing enough going forward AWB has alittle bit more about him when going forward
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 07 Oct 18 6.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by YT
Sorry, but he wasn’t ‘great’ yesterday or even ‘good’. To be fair, he was no worse than anyone else in an abject display, but it seemed that every time he had the ball it ended up with the opposition. When he gets forward, he doesn’t seem to be able to pass to a team-mate. It was exactly the same at the Southampton game. That is my point!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 07 Oct 18 6.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
That is my point! Good one! Sorry if I slightly misconstrued your original point.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.