This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 15 Oct 17 2.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I watched 'This Week' on Thursday.....The BBC...a program most people in Britain get....I was watching that and heard a racist women basically paraphrase that 'white people are inherently evil'. The BBC has produced and aired a 'take' by trans model Munroe Bergdorf, in which white people are described as inherently racist and 'the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth'. So why is it ok for the BBC to give air time to that crap and yet Richard Spencer doesn't get air time to raise his crap? Saw that and couldn't believe what a t*** 'she' was. Just another oddball with a massive chip on their shoulder. As you say, why the hell did the BBC give this crap airtime on a political show and why do we patronise f***wits? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Oct 2017 2.38pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 15 Oct 17 3.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Do you spend your life trawling for tosh like this? Your fanaticism is quite disturbing at times. No I like to read Newsweek. It was in there. Thought it was a respected journal
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 15 Oct 17 4.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Saw that and couldn't believe what a t*** 'she' was. Just another oddball with a massive chip on their shoulder. As you say, why the hell did the BBC give this crap airtime on a political show and why do we patronise f***wits? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Oct 2017 2.38pm) If they are going to put stuff like that up, then stick the opposite up. Personally I think 'hate' speech as being illegal is bollocks...she has the right to speak non violent speech if that's what she believes or half believes in (or more likely looking for attention for).......but if you are going to have her then you should also be giving her opposite airtime. 'Hate speech' is bollocks.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 15 Oct 17 5.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Shock horror, racist says hate speech is acceptable and perhaps does not exist.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 15 Oct 17 5.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pefwin
Shock horror, racist says hate speech is acceptable and perhaps does not exist. What's your definition of 'racist'?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 15 Oct 17 5.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
What's your definition of 'racist'? Typical lazy disaffected white lower class, any search engine would do you. I would suggest using your fingers something Mrs Hedgehog has not said for many a year.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 15 Oct 17 5.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If they are going to put stuff like that up, then stick the opposite up. Personally I think 'hate' speech as being illegal is bollocks...she has the right to speak non violent speech if that's what she believes or half believes in (or more likely looking for attention for).......but if you are going to have her then you should also be giving her opposite airtime. 'Hate speech' is bollocks. I have no idea why we give airtime to idiots of any creed on political shows because they happen to be 'celebrities,' especially when what they say runs counter to public interest. I also suspect that there might be a growing number of black people who are fed up with people like this supposedly speaking on their behalf.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 15 Oct 17 6.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pefwin
Typical lazy disaffected white lower class, any search engine would do you. I would suggest using your fingers something Mrs Hedgehog has not said for many a year. Could you clarify old chap. Is your definition of 'racist', "Typical lazy disaffected white lower class" ie: all white lower class are racists, or is it your description of me as " lazy disaffected white lower class". Mrs Hedgehog has no complaints.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 15 Oct 17 6.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I have no idea why we give airtime to idiots of any creed on political shows because they happen to be 'celebrities,' especially when what they say runs counter to public interest. I also suspect that there might be a growing number of black people who are fed up with people like this supposedly speaking on their behalf. True.....media like the controversial especially if it's just a little bit further than what they push anyway. She was countered very well on the show....though it was embarrassing watching Balls try to shoehorn acceptability onto what she was saying. Still, it was non violent speech and on that score, I have no issues with it.....apart the unequal weight of the amount of progressivism I hear on the BBC. They get away without being countered a lot of the time.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 15 Oct 17 6.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
True.....media like the controversial especially if it's just a little bit further than what they push anyway. She was countered very well on the show....though it was embarrassing watching Balls try to shoehorn acceptability onto what she was saying. Still, it was non violent speech and on that score, I have no issues with it.....apart the unequal weight of the amount of progressivism I hear on the BBC. They get away without being countered a lot of the time. It does make you wonder what levels politicians would stoop to in order to secure votes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Oct 17 7.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Saw that and couldn't believe what a t*** 'she' was. Just another oddball with a massive chip on their shoulder. As you say, why the hell did the BBC give this crap airtime on a political show and why do we patronise f***wits? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Oct 2017 2.38pm) Neither is acceptable. You do seem to watch a lot of BBC... You should complain too
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 15 Oct 17 7.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
True.....media like the controversial especially if it's just a little bit further than what they push anyway. She was countered very well on the show....though it was embarrassing watching Balls try to shoehorn acceptability onto what she was saying. Still, it was non violent speech and on that score, I have no issues with it.....apart the unequal weight of the amount of progressivism I hear on the BBC. They get away without being countered a lot of the time. Talking of unequal weight... If it were someone brown...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.