This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 23 Jun 17 7.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by wordup
Have you any idea how high the rate of house building would have to be to keep pace with current population increase? It ain't gonna happen. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (23 Jun 2017 7.50pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 23 Jun 17 8.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
How little you understand. Standard fare from this poster, alas.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
simonmdt x 23 Jun 17 9.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
How little you understand. Would you, or your little chum, Cucking Funt like to educate me of what it is I don't understand? I think I understand the pair of you very well.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
simonmdt x 23 Jun 17 9.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Have you any idea how high the rate of house building would have to be to keep pace with current population increase? It ain't gonna happen. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (23 Jun 2017 7.50pm) Of course it is. And I do have an idea as how high the rate of building would have to be to keep pace. With the population growing at a rate of 500k per year and the average number of people per dwelling currently being 2.4 that's just over 200k new homes per year Hardly uncontrollable. But you carry on making a fool of yourself
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
simonmdt x 23 Jun 17 9.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well if you are going to say that's a lot of tosh then I'm going to say that the contention that '10% of England is built upon' is also a statement of technical tosh. Those statistics included things like people's back gardens. If you are going to criticise someone else try not to be easily risible yourself.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 23 Jun 17 10.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
The increased rate of population growth in the UK is because of the huge levels of immigration over the period. Oh yes I remember the promise of 'down to the tens of thousands'. Now who was it said that?
Edited by nickgusset (23 Jun 2017 10.21pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 23 Jun 17 10.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by simonmdt
For nearly 15 years they should've built that many and never came close (I remember having this opinion before it was bigger news) yet you think it's going to start happening. Then there's the people who should've been housed in those years on top of the houses needed going forward. I'm afraid youre in denial my friend.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 23 Jun 17 10.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by elgrande
Since 2004 (when Blair opened the UK up to eastern European migrants,the population has increased by 5 million people,before that it took 35 years to do that. No, no he didn't. He just happened to be in power when what the Tories had signed up to came to pass. You voted for them no doubt back then so stop yer whingeing.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 23 Jun 17 10.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by simonmdt
Would you, or your little chum, Cucking Funt like to educate me of what it is I don't understand? I think I understand the pair of you very well. I'm with you you Simon and your golf course critique. Nail on head. There's on ejust down the river from Richmond and massive it is too. Could probably house 5,000 if built upon. Good social housing too. Would p1ss off 300 rich golfers so maybe it isn't such a good idea.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 23 Jun 17 10.51pm | |
---|---|
People want to live in cities on the whole. More use of brownfield sites is whats wanted rather than ruining what is left of our greenbelt.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 23 Jun 17 10.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
People want to live in cities on the whole. More use of brownfield sites is whats wanted rather than ruining what is left of our greenbelt. Yep. Just a quick glance at Google maps confirms you are, and may I say well done for a change, correct.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 23 Jun 17 11.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
People want to live in cities on the whole. More use of brownfield sites is whats wanted rather than ruining what is left of our greenbelt. Urban Planning bender
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.