This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 18 Nov 20 6.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
I remember that model well. In the mid 90s a mate and I learned of its existence. Legend had it that this glimpse of a golden future resided in the foyer, just inside the posh entrance to the exclusive 'high end' suites and bars in the main stand. If you remember the main stand in the 90s you will know I am playing fast and loose with the words 'foyer', 'posh', 'exclusive' and 'high end'. The area did have heavy wooden front doors though. Anyway, after one home game us two teenage oiks took it upon ourselves to wander in through those heavy wooden doors and see the future for ourselves. Sure enough, there was the model located on a plinth behind a glass case, cordoned off by some ornamental red and gold rope, like the crown f**in jewels! We looked at it for all of three seconds before a bunch of overweight middle aged stewards in bright jackets came bundling down the stairs telling us in no uncertain terms to sling our hooks. You'd have thought we had come to steal the ZDS cup or something. Looking back at it now I thinks its best described as 'a concept model'. The concept apparently being to replicate the Holmesdale on all four sides. And also to build around / over / instead of Sainsburys. I think Ron was serious about it, as Palace got planning permission for a new main stand not long after the Holmesdale was built, and that new stand was indeed an exact replica of the Holmesdale - literally so, in that the new main stand would have been no bigger than the Holmesdale, and would have run not from corner flag to corner flag, but from from the Whitehorse Lane end to around the edge of the penalty area, leaving a huge void between it and the corner flag. It would have been 2/3rds of a stand! The reason for this was to protect the amenity of the houses we have now agreed to buy, demolish and replace. I suppose the prospect of buying up those houses was all a but much for CPFC in the 1990s, even in the halcon days of reaching a cup final and finishing third in the league. How times change. Those houses are probably worth half a Benteke now. God knows what that says about the modern world, but it has made buying them and knocking them down possible.
Edited by TheBigToePunt (18 Nov 2020 5.43pm) I'm sure those houses are worth a bit more than 50p.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Zimeagle Harare 19 Nov 20 9.03am | |
---|---|
I also remember the Ron Noades model. Does anyone know how he intended to get round the line of site issue with the Park Road residents?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 19 Nov 20 9.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Azerbaijan Eagle
But how many properties? The Anfield Expansion (as anyone can see when they go there) is based on buying up properties and leaving them derelict, blighting the area and ruining the property value so that no one except Liverpool wants to buy them. I am not suggesting we deliberately do that or that Liverpool has deliberately done that however with all the money floating around would that not be a realistic answer - offer those people whose light is taken etc a stupid amount of money to move, buy the property and then sell it once the planning is approved - probably at the same price at what we paid for it by the way. I sometimes wonder if Croydon Council actually realise what an asset Crystal Palace is to the borough now we are in the Premier League - what the effect could be of a brand new shiny stadium on the surrounding area, that if it was managed correctly how it could benefit the local community - make the stadium multi use so that it is used in some way 7 days a week not just once a fortnight for 9 months of the year - all possible - it just needs planned correctly. I started working in Azerbaijan nearly 19 years ago. The population here only knew Manchester United and Bobby Charlton back then. 6 months ago I am in a restaurant talking to a friend about football, mentioned Crystal Palace and the waiter serving us said "Crystal Palace? Good team" So okay , he doesn't know much about football, however he had heard of us. So.......why wouldn't Croydon Council want to see a Premier League club with Worldwide Appeal have a fabulous new stadium that could even be part of a fantastic re development of Thornton Heath. What else does Croydon have except East Croydon Station (and its quick access to London and Gatwick) that is of any real value to Croydon? Liverpool has a completely different housing problem compared to London caused by population decline between the 70's and 90's where around 300,000 moved away from the city causing a 40% drop in population resulting in a massive oversupply of housing. Knocking down Victorian housing stock their isn't much of a problem. In 2010 Croydon Council realised that Crystal Palace were a massive asset to the borough, but as long as the club is self sustaining and there's no threat of job losses (directly or indirectly) then they don't really care. It's noticeable that the council has spent £50m on the Colonnades and £30m on a hotel since the stadium expansion plans were announced. Both investments have burdened them with huge loss making assets. If they invested the money into a successful business that needed capital investment to expand, rather than failing businesses that turn out to be money pits, then they might not be in this mess. They'd have been better of giving the money to the club and attracting 8,000 extra people to the area each fortnight that would spend money in local shops and bars. Instead it seems they have just dragged their feet and hindered progress to try and make a quick buck, like they do with everything.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 19 Nov 20 12.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Zimeagle
I also remember the Ron Noades model. Does anyone know how he intended to get round the line of site issue with the Park Road residents? He probably wouldn't have thought that far ahead, it was simply a concept, not a detailed plan. Redeveloping the Arthur is important. The new main stand gets capacity up to 34,000. With no obvious scope to expand the Holmesdale or Whitehorse ends, getting 40,000+ seats at Selhurst has always depended on building a two-tier AW stand. The footprint of the current AW is much bigger than the main stand, so there is potential there. As you say though, the impact on Park Road houses is key. Even if we could buy all those houses as Azerbaijan Eagle suggests, the visual/daylight/sunlight impact of a new AW stand on Park road homes would still be considered as part of the planning application. Buying up the houses wouldn't get CPFC off that particular hook. There is no reason to see that as fatal though. The visual impacts of the stand would be weighed up by the Council against things like the economic and cultural benefits a strong Premier League CPFC brings. Lets not forget, the Council approved the new main stand for exactly those reasons, having previously approved the Holmesdale Road redevelopment, despite it resulting in a huge, very tall, bulky building which would have altered the outlook for the nearest houses drastically. The Arthur seats 8500. The new Main stand will seat 13,500. If we can replace the AW with something like the new Main stand, we would be very close to 40,000 seats overall, though personally I think the AW could be even bigger. The Main stand has a sloping top tier (reducing down to the sides), whilst a new AW could be built fully to the corners like the Holmesdale is.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 19 Nov 20 1.44pm | |
---|---|
I love the Arthur with all its faults. The flat gradient and low roof make it brilliant for generating atmosphere and away fans hate it. I think its underappreciated by Palace fans. Apparently the capacity is 9,574 so even with the added capacity in the main stand, it will still be a tricky rebuild. As the concourse is situated behind the seats there's a small strip of land about 5m wide that can still be used for extra seats, but not many opportunities unless you build upwards with large overhanging teirs. What ever happens it will be a complex build with a lot of supporters displaced while it is underway. Once corporate facilities are built in the main stand, it could be better to take out the boxes in the White Horse to provide as many extra seats as possible before knocking down the Arthur.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 19 Nov 20 1.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
I love the Arthur with all its faults. The flat gradient and low roof make it brilliant for generating atmosphere and away fans hate it. I think its underappreciated by Palace fans. Apparently the capacity is 9,574 so even with the added capacity in the main stand, it will still be a tricky rebuild. As the concourse is situated behind the seats there's a small strip of land about 5m wide that can still be used for extra seats, but not many opportunities unless you build upwards with large overhanging teirs. What ever happens it will be a complex build with a lot of supporters displaced while it is underway. Once corporate facilities are built in the main stand, it could be better to take out the boxes in the White Horse to provide as many extra seats as possible before knocking down the Arthur. I've always loved the AW, even with the posts that get in the way! Ideally it would be possible to keep nearly all of the current stand and seats, remove the roof and stick a large second tier on top, a bit like they are doing with the main stand. Nobody gets displaced, the capacity remains high throughout the build. I've no doubt it is far from being that simple!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
GJDCPFC Calgary 19 Nov 20 3.17pm | |
---|---|
I believe the issue with the AW are the houses behind on Park Road and their “right to light”, meaning no new stand could be higher than the current stand.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 19 Nov 20 3.26pm | |
---|---|
How about just putting seats on a new (strengthened) roof of the Arthur? The increase in height would be minimal without a cover. Put the away fans up there and if it looks like rain, hand out free red and blue ponchos! Sorted!
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Nov 20 5.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Zimeagle
I also remember the Ron Noades model. Does anyone know how he intended to get round the line of site issue with the Park Road residents? That was actual size - he wanted to miniaturise the fans and players too.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 20 Nov 20 11.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by GJDCPFC
I believe the issue with the AW are the houses behind on Park Road and their “right to light”, meaning no new stand could be higher than the current stand. I don't think that is insurmountable. The homeowners on Holmesdale Road had the same rights but the stand went up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 20 Nov 20 4.50pm | |
---|---|
As mentioned by some on here previously... "The biggest stumbling block right now is we need a small sliver of land from Sainsbury’s. "They’re a commercial organisation, we understand that, but I think what they’re asking for is ridiculous and, at the moment, they’re blocking the project. It’s fundamentally a ransom strip and they’re holding us to ransom. So I hope that we can get somewhere negotiating with them." 'We are exploring other options with the council' sounds like a CPO could be threatened if Sainos don't play ball.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 20 Nov 20 5.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
As mentioned by some on here previously... "The biggest stumbling block right now is we need a small sliver of land from Sainsbury’s. "They’re a commercial organisation, we understand that, but I think what they’re asking for is ridiculous and, at the moment, they’re blocking the project. It’s fundamentally a ransom strip and they’re holding us to ransom. So I hope that we can get somewhere negotiating with them." 'We are exploring other options with the council' sounds like a CPO could be threatened if Sainos don't play ball. I think you are correct about the CPO. Sainsbury’s are in a financial mess nationally, why did they ever acquire Argos? My brother-in-law worked for them years ago when they acquired Homebase ( that went well didn’t it) I can see several stores closing, so presumably want to eke out as much as possible, not trying to defend them at all
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.