This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  Hrolf The Ganger  06 Oct 19 8.03pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What is really f***ing obvious is that some people want you to see it as political because it suits their own political agenda. What is also f***ing obvious is that some people are naive enough to believe the bs! The SC was simply a development of the Law Lords, which actually moved it away from any suggestion of political interference. That it happened whilst Blair was PM is entirely coincidental. Strengthening our legal system benefits us all. Some people would see a conspiracy in a tea cup! Narcissists always find a way to be 'right' no matter what happens. You are imprisoned by your own dogma.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
cryrst  The garden of England 06 Oct 19 8.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by elgrande
It's so f***ing obvious that this was a political decision, yet still certain people argue against it. You know Blair the person responsible for hundreds if not thousands of British service men/ and womens death due to his illegal war. P.s..where has Stirling gone?. Stirling is having a sabbatical as he got a yellow.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 06 Oct 19 8.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
He didn't have a case or need a case. Remainer institution intervened so now they have placed themselves above the Government, the Houses of Parliament and the Queen. Hope you enjoy being ruled by a bunch of Blairite judges. Laughable conspiracy theory tosh. From you I expect better.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 06 Oct 19 8.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
in your opinion!! No in the opinion of all 11 law lords meaning it is the law.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 06 Oct 19 8.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Narcissists always find a way to be 'right' no matter what happens. You are imprisoned by your own dogma. Pot. Kettle
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 06 Oct 19 9.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
Laughable conspiracy theory tosh. From you I expect better. You are welcome to look into the background of the eleven judges and come to your own conclusion. The obvious bias just makes it ridiculous that 11 politically appointed and motivated judges can overrule a system of government that has been in place for over 300 years. That is worrying, but I guess people don't need to worry while they are getting their own way. When things change though.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Oct 19 9.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Narcissists always find a way to be 'right' no matter what happens. You are imprisoned by your own dogma. As no-one who really knows me would ever describe me as a "narcissist" that made me think, and then laugh. So thanks for that. I certainly don't feel imprisoned by anything. The truth always sets you free and I think I have found it over this but I can always be proved wrong.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Oct 19 9.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
You are welcome to look into the background of the eleven judges and come to your own conclusion. The obvious bias just makes it ridiculous that 11 politically appointed and motivated judges can overrule a system of government that has been in place for over 300 years. That is worrying, but I guess people don't need to worry while they are getting their own way. When things change though. Do you actually understand how a Supreme Court justice is appointed? Or do you just think you do?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 06 Oct 19 9.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Do you actually understand how a Supreme Court justice is appointed? Or do you just think you do? I've actually looked into it - which is pretty obviously a lot more than you have done.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 06 Oct 19 9.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Firstly is it actually true? All I have heard from Chakrabati is that she regards Lady Hale as a "heroine". She would know her from the House of Lords and quite possibly from her other legal work, as both are advocates with an interest in promoting the advancement of women. Secondly why would it matter if it is true? Judges and MPs have friends, but it doesn't mean that affects their capacity to do their jobs. Judges leave their personal life, and personal opinions, in their homes. Their only master is the law. Never forget that the decision a week or so ago was unanimous. Lady Hale just happened to be the one who delivered it. Who knows who are the personal friends, and opinions, of the other 10 justices. This is the tabloids just trying to wind up people like you and undermine our legal system. They should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. Firstly I think any friendship/ close connections should have been divulged prior to the case.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 06 Oct 19 9.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
One of Wisbech's neighbours.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Oct 19 10.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I've actually looked into it - which is pretty obviously a lot more than you have done. I did over a week ago when this nonsense first started to circulate. Here are the biographies of each. Not much there to indicate any political affiliations, let alone bias:- Judges are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister, who receives recommendations from a selection commission. So you explain. Where am I wrong?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.