Topic

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2246 of 2586 < 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 >

Topic Locked

cryrst The garden of England 06 Oct 19 7.06am
Originally posted by .TUX. It died in '08. Since then all we've had is trillions pumped in and lower and lower interest rates. Historically low. We now have zero interest rates to prop up a continually failing bloody system which now needs more injections (cash) to continue the farce. The ECB is a fraud along with the continued US 'Repo-market' bail-out (yet more QE?). The 08 crash, though once again caused by the ever present greedy bankers, started from the bottom up. The next, as the Repo-Market bail-outs show, will start from the top down. Big difference! PS Scrutinize at will...........i don't see anyone else here highlighting the problems that truly matter. Edited by .TUX. (06 Oct 2019 12.08am) TBH though tux how ever much you may be right. They wouldn't tell us if a meteor was heading our way. So why would they tell us about this.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 06 Oct 19 7.06am

Originally posted by .TUX.

It died in '08.
Since then all we've had is trillions pumped in and lower and lower interest rates. Historically low.
We now have zero interest rates to prop up a continually failing bloody system which now needs more injections (cash) to continue the farce. The ECB is a fraud along with the continued US 'Repo-market' bail-out (yet more QE?).
The 08 crash, though once again caused by the ever present greedy bankers, started from the bottom up.
The next, as the Repo-Market bail-outs show, will start from the top down.
Big difference!

PS Scrutinize at will...........i don't see anyone else here highlighting the problems that truly matter.

Edited by .TUX. (06 Oct 2019 12.08am)

TBH though tux how ever much you may be right.
They wouldn't tell us if a meteor was heading our way. So why would they tell us about this.

Alert a moderator to this post

chris123 hove actually 06 Oct 19 7.36am
Originally posted by .TUX. It died in '08. Since then all we've had is trillions pumped in and lower and lower interest rates. Historically low. We now have zero interest rates to prop up a continually failing bloody system which now needs more injections (cash) to continue the farce. The ECB is a fraud along with the continued US 'Repo-market' bail-out (yet more QE?). The 08 crash, though once again caused by the ever present greedy bankers, started from the bottom up. The next, as the Repo-Market bail-outs show, will start from the top down. Big difference! PS Scrutinize at will...........i don't see anyone else here highlighting the problems that truly matter. Edited by .TUX. (06 Oct 2019 12.08am) We've had low inflation too - which is good surely?
Alert a moderator to this post

chris123

hove actually 06 Oct 19 7.36am

Originally posted by .TUX.

PS Scrutinize at will...........i don't see anyone else here highlighting the problems that truly matter.

Edited by .TUX. (06 Oct 2019 12.08am)

We've had low inflation too - which is good surely?

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 06 Oct 19 8.11am
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC Sorry, is that a new rule? Didn’t think so. Relentless posting is understandably overbearing especially when it’s mundane responses that you don’t agree with (sorry, but some are a little long winded) but if he keeps getting asked the same questions then he’ll keep sending back the same answers. Works both ways. Who said anything about rules. I was making a point which was quote obviously a personal opinion and nothing to do with rules. It wouldn't be so bad if his long winded and repetitive posts were responses to questions asked of him but most of them are not but that doesn't seem to stop him butting in and spouting his mantra
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

06 Oct 19 8.11am

Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

Sorry, is that a new rule? Didn’t think so.

Relentless posting is understandably overbearing especially when it’s mundane responses that you don’t agree with (sorry, but some are a little long winded) but if he keeps getting asked the same questions then he’ll keep sending back the same answers. Works both ways.

Who said anything about rules. I was making a point which was quote obviously a personal opinion and nothing to do with rules.

It wouldn't be so bad if his long winded and repetitive posts were responses to questions asked of him but most of them are not but that doesn't seem to stop him butting in and spouting his mantra

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 06 Oct 19 8.54am
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC Of course they are. Your point? That because both sides are his point was meaningless? The level of debate on here by some is dross of the lowest order. Thanks for those kind words
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 06 Oct 19 8.54am

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

Of course they are. Your point? That because both sides are his point was meaningless? The level of debate on here by some is dross of the lowest order.

Thanks for those kind words

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 06 Oct 19 8.59am
Sure Wissie will wish to comment: [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 06 Oct 19 8.59am

Sure Wissie will wish to comment:

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 06 Oct 19 9.23am
Originally posted by Spiderman [Link] Leaving aside what Lady hale said or did the sentence that caught my eye was "the Supreme Court media team insisted Baroness Hale was given no prior warning of the stage's backdrop. So the supreme court has it's own media team
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

06 Oct 19 9.23am

Originally posted by Spiderman

[Link]

Leaving aside what Lady hale said or did the sentence that caught my eye was "the Supreme Court media team insisted Baroness Hale was given no prior warning of the stage's backdrop.

So the supreme court has it's own media team

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 06 Oct 19 9.26am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle Leaving aside what Lady hale said or did the sentence that caught my eye was "the Supreme Court media team insisted Baroness Hale was given no prior warning of the stage's backdrop. So the supreme court has it's own media team How surprising (not) that Chakrabati is a close friend
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 06 Oct 19 9.26am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Leaving aside what Lady hale said or did the sentence that caught my eye was "the Supreme Court media team insisted Baroness Hale was given no prior warning of the stage's backdrop.

So the supreme court has it's own media team

How surprising (not) that Chakrabati is a close friend

Alert a moderator to this post

SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 06 Oct 19 10.24am
Originally posted by .TUX. It died in '08. Since then all we've had is trillions pumped in and lower and lower interest rates. Historically low. We now have zero interest rates to prop up a continually failing bloody system which now needs more injections (cash) to continue the farce. The ECB is a fraud along with the continued US 'Repo-market' bail-out (yet more QE?). The 08 crash, though once again caused by the ever present greedy bankers, started from the bottom up. The next, as the Repo-Market bail-outs show, will start from the top down. Big difference! PS Scrutinize at will...........i don't see anyone else here highlighting the problems that truly matter. Edited by .TUX. (06 Oct 2019 12.08am) Actually, it was way before that, as you should know. Deregulation in the 80s eliminated steady, semi-stable growth once and for all. But let's not pretend the system was perfect before then eh? Best worst. Human nature is as human nature does, no matter the construct, system or ideal. It all corrupts eventually. That is a fact. Also the 'greedy banker' narrative is a red herring. Politicians started this journey, and if you think people were not going to take advantage of it due to their own moral compass, then you simply don't understand how the world works, or you're incredibly naive. I can't really blame a bunch of people for gaming the system because they've been allowed to do so. Should they have done it? no. Can I see why they did? yes. Did they create the conditions that allowed them to exploit it so ruthlessly? No. Edited by SW19 CPFC (06 Oct 2019 10.28am) Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.
Alert a moderator to this post

SW19 CPFC

Addiscombe West 06 Oct 19 10.24am

Originally posted by .TUX.

PS Scrutinize at will...........i don't see anyone else here highlighting the problems that truly matter.

Edited by .TUX. (06 Oct 2019 12.08am)

Actually, it was way before that, as you should know. Deregulation in the 80s eliminated steady, semi-stable growth once and for all. But let's not pretend the system was perfect before then eh? Best worst. Human nature is as human nature does, no matter the construct, system or ideal. It all corrupts eventually. That is a fact.

Also the 'greedy banker' narrative is a red herring. Politicians started this journey, and if you think people were not going to take advantage of it due to their own moral compass, then you simply don't understand how the world works, or you're incredibly naive. I can't really blame a bunch of people for gaming the system because they've been allowed to do so. Should they have done it? no. Can I see why they did? yes. Did they create the conditions that allowed them to exploit it so ruthlessly? No.

Edited by SW19 CPFC (06 Oct 2019 10.28am)

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Oct 19 10.34am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle Leaving aside what Lady hale said or did the sentence that caught my eye was "the Supreme Court media team insisted Baroness Hale was given no prior warning of the stage's backdrop. So the supreme court has it's own media team Seems a sensible move to ask an agency to keep an eye on things at this time of heightened attention on them. Judges should not have to be concerned about political attacks from right wing rags like the Daily Mail trying to stir up mistrust in our judicial system. It's not their area of expertise is it? That's the law. Judges have a right to a private life just as much as anyone else. Holding strong political views doesn't mean a plumber cannot fix a leak professionally. The law is the law. Judges judge things on that alone. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 06 Oct 19 10.34am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Leaving aside what Lady hale said or did the sentence that caught my eye was "the Supreme Court media team insisted Baroness Hale was given no prior warning of the stage's backdrop.

So the supreme court has it's own media team

Seems a sensible move to ask an agency to keep an eye on things at this time of heightened attention on them. Judges should not have to be concerned about political attacks from right wing rags like the Daily Mail trying to stir up mistrust in our judicial system. It's not their area of expertise is it? That's the law. Judges have a right to a private life just as much as anyone else. Holding strong political views doesn't mean a plumber cannot fix a leak professionally. The law is the law. Judges judge things on that alone.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 06 Oct 19 11.14am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Seems a sensible move to ask an agency to keep an eye on things at this time of heightened attention on them. Judges should not have to be concerned about political attacks from right wing rags like the Daily Mail trying to stir up mistrust in our judicial system. So you're suggesting that their media team has only been assembled in the last couple of weeks then
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

06 Oct 19 11.14am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

So you're suggesting that their media team has only been assembled in the last couple of weeks then

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Oct 19 12.05pm
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle So you're suggesting that their media team has only been assembled in the last couple of weeks then It wouldn't surprise me if they are currently using the services of a public relations agency to handle the scrutiny but I have no specific knowledge. They do, apparently, have a "Press Office" to handle routine enquiries but I would guess it's quite small and not used to the kind of attention they are now subjected to. Handing out details of which case will be heard when and by whom isn't quite the same as being hounded by the Mail on what Lady Hale did last night. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 06 Oct 19 12.05pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

So you're suggesting that their media team has only been assembled in the last couple of weeks then

It wouldn't surprise me if they are currently using the services of a public relations agency to handle the scrutiny but I have no specific knowledge.

They do, apparently, have a "Press Office" to handle routine enquiries but I would guess it's quite small and not used to the kind of attention they are now subjected to. Handing out details of which case will be heard when and by whom isn't quite the same as being hounded by the Mail on what Lady Hale did last night.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 06 Oct 19 12.14pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Seems a sensible move to ask an agency to keep an eye on things at this time of heightened attention on them. Judges should not have to be concerned about political attacks from right wing rags like the Daily Mail trying to stir up mistrust in our judicial system. It's not their area of expertise is it? That's the law. Judges have a right to a private life just as much as anyone else. Holding strong political views doesn't mean a plumber cannot fix a leak professionally. The law is the law. Judges judge things on that alone. Anyone else to add to the list of irreproachable authorities?
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

06 Oct 19 12.14pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Anyone else to add to the list of irreproachable authorities?

Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 2246 of 2586 < 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors