I believe that millions of us will never 'live with' another referendum with Remain as an option in any way, shape or form. Remain lost.

And a GE has to happen eventually. Then we cast our votes solely based on who will take us out of the EU immediately. No referendums just a simple trip to Brussels, hand in the notice again and a default position of no deal.

We are leaving the EU no matter what or else the UK implodes.

But a majority did agree with me. That is the point. Leave won. I am not the one arguing for a second chance because my side lost.

Why this constant win and lose rhetoric? Isn't it obvious that after 3 years no-one "won"? We all have lost. The result in 2016 wasn't 99:1. It was 52:48. With the 52% far from united on why they voted as they did. Since then, despite a lot of effort we haven't found a way to leave that Parliament can live with. This needs to be resolved and it won't be if one side thinks it has 100% of the truth on it's "side".

And given the mood in the country at the moment do you honestly think a second referendum will solve anything? I will not vote in another referendum that has Remain on the ballot paper and will refuse to accept the legitimacy of any result from it.

That's your choice but also your loss. I hope you don't have to make that choice.

Nothing is resolved now until we either leave on the 31st with or without a deal or else, we have a GE in which parties can be honest about their stances. Then if Parliament has a majority for Remain with the courage of their convictions, it can vote to Revoke.

Parliament will, I am quite sure, try to stop us leaving without a deal. Whether the EU will agree is unknown. Mostly likely is a GE in November with an extension agreed. The new Parliament could decide to revoke Article 50, but it's very unlikely unless it is just to buy time. More likely is either a "no deal" majority of the Tories and the Brexit Party, with the Tories still a minority government, or a hung Parliament with a "no deal" consortium trying to form a government and offering a referendum of the type I have described. A continuing mess though.

But another referendum? Can you imagine how toxic that would be? Or what happens if there is a mass boycott of it? It ramps tensions up and gives a legitimate justification for people to lose faith in the voting process.

We will need cool heads and real leadership. Which is not currently coming from either the Tories or Labour.

Not only before the June 23rd vote but since there are reams of footage of a variety of politicians promising to honour the result then doing a complete U-turn. At least if they betray the Leave vote on the back of a manifesto promise to do so in the run-up to a GE we still maintain a semblance of living in a democracy.

But a second referendum when the first has not been honoured? I shudder to think about it.

You are wrong. The first referendum result has been "honoured"! A great deal of effort has been made to honour it but it simply hasn't yet yielded a result acceptable to our Parliament and Parliament is where the final decisions are always taken. What Parliament does now to try to reconcile the various positions is a big challenge, but what we must all do, you included, is to recognise that your's is not the only position.

The Supreme Court has only been in existence for 10 years. Who would have made this decision prior to its creation?

The Law Lords.

And there we have it. Remainer logic. Lets envisage you get your way. A second ref, a turn out of under 50% and less than 17.4 million votes for a Remain victory.

What then? Is that faith in our process restored? Do people say 'oh well, that is all fine now.'.

Of course they don't. MILLIONS feel betrayed. MILLIONS feel let done. MILLLIONS feel their votes count for nothing.

And a stab in the back narrative is cemented firmly into the nations political DNA. You cannot undo the result on June 23rd. People voted to Leave the EU. You might not like it but that is what happened.

Opening the doors to all sorts. Because somebody can, quite legimately and with absolute proof, make the point that voting for change is a waste of time. You want change, it has to be forced. Taken. Forget the ballot box, a waste of time.

And the blame for that will lie at the feet of people like you. You want that? Do you honestly think a second referendum settles anything at all?

And what about all those terrible hedge funds who only make money if the economy tanks.