This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Midlands Eagle 30 Sep 19 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Just looked at "the other place" for the first time in years and at their politics forum for the first time ever. It's good to see that, at first sight anyway, there seems to be a great deal more balance in the views being expressed there. I would hate to think this forum represented the views of the typical Palace supporter. This is a recent post in their Brexit section, which seems a pretty accurate summary of how things developed, and might provoke an interesting debate here:- I think that you are confusing "an accurate summary" with a summary that co-incides with your own views
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 30 Sep 19 1.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
4) He didn't allow all British Citizens to vote, or 16 and 17 year olds, or tax paying Europeans in the UK nor did he set a minimum 2/3rds constitutional change threshold Quote They’re part of why we’re voting. To have them vote on the UK’s future isn’t satisfactory.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Sep 19 1.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I think that you are confusing "an accurate summary" with a summary that co-incides with your own views Maybe that's why I used "seems"? Although there is a lot there that doesn't appear to me to be really controversial. It seems a pretty accurate timeline to me, blended with some personal opinions for colour.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 30 Sep 19 1.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Even more inflammatory are some of the things posted on here but, so far as we know, as there aren't any MPs posting here the impact is not so great. Just as the impact of an MP's words is less than that of a PM! Keeping things in proportion matters! Really!! I may have missed it but, I can't remember anyone on here threatening to stab anyone. Please read previous links with quotes, you SHOULD then change your opinion on this
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 30 Sep 19 1.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I think that you are confusing "an accurate summary" with a summary that co-incides with your own views My thoughts exactly. Of course, Wissie always has the option of only reading that forum, as they appear to be on the same wavelength and he seems us on here are rather "rabid" in our opinions
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 30 Sep 19 1.42pm | |
---|---|
What a lovely bunch, Nice to see the Lib Dems leading this "democratic action
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 30 Sep 19 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Just looked at "the other place" for the first time in years and at their politics forum for the first time ever. It's good to see that, at first sight anyway, there seems to be a great deal more balance in the views being expressed there. I would hate to think this forum represented the views of the typical Palace supporter. This is a recent post in their Brexit section, which seems a pretty accurate summary of how things developed, and might provoke an interesting debate here:-
1) Cameron called the referendum, not for any reason of conviction but simply to sideline UKIP in the 2015 General Election and to a lesser degree appease the lunatic wing of his own party, be they MPs or members 2) He called the referendum in 2016 at a bad moment in the economic cycle and at the height of the Syrian refugee crisis 3) He called a once in a lifetime referendum, but made it advisory, meaning it wasn't subject to electoral commission rules 4) He didn't allow all British Citizens to vote, or 16 and 17 year olds, or tax paying Europeans in the UK nor did he set a minimum 2/3rds constitutional change threshold 5) The question asked was open to wild interpretation and not a choice with two defined answers 6) The campaign was woeful and not co-ordinated in a sensible way 7) Johnson went back on his word and principles and came out for Leave purely to further his own career, betraying Cameron in the process. He then lied through his teeth to paint a picture of an amazing post Brexit Britain that we all now know is bollocks. After losing Cameron, instead of appointing a cross party body of politicians, civil servants and trade specialists to formulate and negotiate the best Brexit plan possible for the country, resigned and therefore made the subsequent Tory leadership election all about who would negotiate Brexit and how hard it would be 9) May made zero attempt to reach any sort of consensus across the House but also failed to stand up to the ERG. She then fatally called an unnecessary election which wiped out her majority 10) May then was in hock to the ERG and DUP, and despite negotiating a pretty hard Brexit that ended free movement, the European Court and allowed us to strike our own trade deals couldn't get it passed because of Johnson and the ERG - members of her own Tory party 11) Johnson gets elected by the lunatic membership by lurching even further right and even more extreme. His policy is one of appealing to the myth of the Dunkirk spirit. As if desperate survival should be a valid choice against a healthy, prosperous and peaceful society. 12) He sets off on a path of illegality and extremism that further alienates Europe, weakens the Union and disgusts all people of humanity whatever their views on Brexit And here we are today, led by a seemingly corrupt, serial liar and cheat, who thinks nothing of breaking the law whether that be to beat up a journalist or illegally shut down parliament. He wants his way like a spoilt two year old after no sleep and a bag of sugar. Be in no doubt, this s*** show is a Tory mess. All because they were worried about losing 5% of their votes to UKIP - a party that had never elected an MP. And because of the gross, unfettered ambitions of the mendacious, philandering sociopath, Alexander Boris de Pieffel Johnson" Voting eligibility largely followed the same rules as a general election with some minor changes e.g. Lords could vote so could Gibraltar.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 30 Sep 19 1.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
What a lovely bunch, Nice to see the Lib Dems leading this "democratic action
Sorry now attached
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 30 Sep 19 2.08pm | |
---|---|
Despicable people with no mandate.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 30 Sep 19 2.13pm | |
---|---|
If he wasn't planning to disobey the law, then obviously it would not be necessary, would it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 30 Sep 19 2.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Just looked at "the other place" for the first time in years and at their politics forum for the first time ever. It's good to see that, at first sight anyway, there seems to be a great deal more balance in the views being expressed there. I would hate to think this forum represented the views of the typical Palace supporter. This is a recent post in their Brexit section, which seems a pretty accurate summary of how things developed, and might provoke an interesting debate here:-
1) Cameron called the referendum, not for any reason of conviction but simply to sideline UKIP in the 2015 General Election and to a lesser degree appease the lunatic wing of his own party, be they MPs or members 2) He called the referendum in 2016 at a bad moment in the economic cycle and at the height of the Syrian refugee crisis 3) He called a once in a lifetime referendum, but made it advisory, meaning it wasn't subject to electoral commission rules 5) The question asked was open to wild interpretation and not a choice with two defined answers 6) The campaign was woeful and not co-ordinated in a sensible way 7) Johnson went back on his word and principles and came out for Leave purely to further his own career, betraying Cameron in the process. He then lied through his teeth to paint a picture of an amazing post Brexit Britain that we all now know is bollocks. After losing Cameron, instead of appointing a cross party body of politicians, civil servants and trade specialists to formulate and negotiate the best Brexit plan possible for the country, resigned and therefore made the subsequent Tory leadership election all about who would negotiate Brexit and how hard it would be 9) May made zero attempt to reach any sort of consensus across the House but also failed to stand up to the ERG. She then fatally called an unnecessary election which wiped out her majority 10) May then was in hock to the ERG and DUP, and despite negotiating a pretty hard Brexit that ended free movement, the European Court and allowed us to strike our own trade deals couldn't get it passed because of Johnson and the ERG - members of her own Tory party 11) Johnson gets elected by the lunatic membership by lurching even further right and even more extreme. His policy is one of appealing to the myth of the Dunkirk spirit. As if desperate survival should be a valid choice against a healthy, prosperous and peaceful society. Be in no doubt, this s*** show is a Tory mess. All because they were worried about losing 5% of their votes to UKIP - a party that had never elected an MP. And because of the gross, unfettered ambitions of the mendacious, philandering sociopath, Alexander Boris de Pieffel Johnson" 3....nowhere did he say it was advisory, only in your mind! In fact he promised to HONOUR the result as did MANY MPs (obviously to keep their jobs in the following election) 5. My voting paper had 2 clearly defined questions LEAVE or REMAIN.....did yours have something different on it? 6...both sides guilty as each other with lies and non truths 7, How do you know its bollox as it hasnt happened yet?? Edited by the silurian (30 Sep 2019 2.15pm) Edited by the silurian (30 Sep 2019 2.17pm) Edited by the silurian (30 Sep 2019 2.18pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Sep 19 2.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Despicable people with no mandate. Nonsense. They have exactly the same mandate as every other MP! Which is to represent their electorate in Parliament and do for them what they believe is in their, and the country's, best interests. Which at the moment is to ensure that a "no deal" Brexit is avoided. Having discussions with similar minded MPs is precisely what they are duty bound to do.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.