This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Niasse Dive
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
chateauferret  29 Nov 17 11.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by spartakev2
Come on guys. Definate penalty that one... Hmmm. The guys in the studio thought Poll was bang on but the commentators at the stadium wouldn't change their minds after he had spoken. It didn't half look to me like he jumped and he contacted Hart, not the other way round. Possibly though he'd have been felled anyway, and Poll was right to point out that the fact that Hart got to the ball did not necessarily exonerate him. Hart's charge out was reckless though and it gave the ref an excuse to give a penalty. In that sense it's different from the Niasse case because in that instance Dann did nothing wrong and did nothing to even risk conceding a foul unless playacting were involved.
============ |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
Harry Tuttle  merseyside 30 Nov 17 5.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bangell
You seem surprised that your opinion is in the minority on this forum ...and again no, but i am surprised at the lack of objectivity here
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Harry Tuttle merseyside 30 Nov 17 5.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
The independent panel decided that was cheating by deception. So, by inference, they decided there was no foul. wrong. if you lot werent so biased you would see the proof. its there in the clips of the incident, the trouble is you geezers dont want to see it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Harry Tuttle merseyside 30 Nov 17 5.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Pundits and Grahm Poll saying that's a pen but it does look to me like Calvert-Lewin jumps over and against the keeper. isnt Graham Poll a pundit because he`s certainly no expert. he`s got form has old Graham, same as Clattenberg. Edited by Harry Tuttle (30 Nov 2017 5.43pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 30 Nov 17 5.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
wrong. if you lot werent so biased you would see the proof. its there in the clips of the incident, the trouble is you geezers dont want to see it. There is no point in discussing this with you further. You've had your say, such as it is; now do one.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 30 Nov 17 5.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
...and again no, but i am surprised at the lack of objectivity here Objectively he dived. Official fact. End of matter.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Harry Tuttle merseyside 30 Nov 17 5.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
There is no point in discussing this with you further. You've had your say, such as it is; now do one.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Harry Tuttle merseyside 30 Nov 17 5.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Hmmm. The guys in the studio thought Poll was bang on but the commentators at the stadium wouldn't change their minds after he had spoken. It didn't half look to me like he jumped and he contacted Hart, not the other way round. Possibly though he'd have been felled anyway, and Poll was right to point out that the fact that Hart got to the ball did not necessarily exonerate him. Hart's charge out was reckless though and it gave the ref an excuse to give a penalty. In that sense it's different from the Niasse case because in that instance Dann did nothing wrong and did nothing to even risk conceding a foul unless playacting were involved. can`t/won`t you even see that Dann takes 2 paces into Niasses` path without attempting to play the ball? its quite clear.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Ray in Houston  Houston 30 Nov 17 5.53pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
wrong. if you lot werent so biased you would see the proof. its there in the clips of the incident, the trouble is you geezers dont want to see it. Sigh... The. Independent. Panel. Looked. At. The. Clips. And. Decided. CHEAT!
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 30 Nov 17 6.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Sigh... The. Independent. Panel. Looked. At. The. Clips. And. Decided. CHEAT! Indeed. Three people reviewed the incident independently and were unanimous in their thinking. As for Niasse's comments to the media after the game it was a case of less justification and more confession.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 30 Nov 17 8.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
can`t/won`t you even see that Dann takes 2 paces into Niasses` path without attempting to play the ball? its quite clear. No. HTH.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
DutchEagleJohan  Vlissingen, Netherlands 01 Dec 17 10.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Clear through your blue glasses while munching a toffee. Lets ruin the game completely and support cheats. Well done objective Harry. In case your aim was winding us all up I have to admit you did well though Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
can`t/won`t you even see that Dann takes 2 paces into Niasses` path without attempting to play the ball? its quite clear.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.