This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 26 Mar 17 9.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
The Inquiry concluded (as reported by the Telegraph) that: "Despite the contrary evidence given by soldiers, we have concluded that none of them fired in response to attacks or threatened attacks by nail or petrol bombers." The report added that no one threw, or threatened to throw, nail or petrol bombs at soldiers; The explanations given by soldiers were rejected, with a number said to have "knowingly put forward false accounts" Members of the so-called Official IRA fired a shot at troops, but missed their target, though crucially it was concluded it was the paratroopers who shot first on Bloody Sunday; ..The firing by soldiers of 1 Para caused the deaths of 13 people and injury to a similar number, none of whom was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury." This also applied to the 14th victim, who died later from injuries. The report added: "We found no instances where it appeared to us that soldiers either were or might have been justified in firing";
Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 8.52pm) I think it's great that you spend so much time and energy highlighting the limitations of the British army and standing up for justice. Well done you. And in your eagerness to set the record straight, it's truly magnanimous of you to acknowledge the part McGuiness played in the blood shed. I do hope that you never need the flawed British Army to defend you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 26 Mar 17 9.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
The Inquiry concluded (as reported by the Telegraph) that: "Despite the contrary evidence given by soldiers, we have concluded that none of them fired in response to attacks or threatened attacks by nail or petrol bombers." The report added that no one threw, or threatened to throw, nail or petrol bombs at soldiers; The explanations given by soldiers were rejected, with a number said to have "knowingly put forward false accounts" Members of the so-called Official IRA fired a shot at troops, but missed their target, though crucially it was concluded it was the paratroopers who shot first on Bloody Sunday; ..The firing by soldiers of 1 Para caused the deaths of 13 people and injury to a similar number, none of whom was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury." This also applied to the 14th victim, who died later from injuries. The report added: "We found no instances where it appeared to us that soldiers either were or might have been justified in firing";
Yes, that's why I said they shot rioters in the belief that they had been shot at, a mistaken belief it appears.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 26 Mar 17 9.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
The Inquiry concluded (as reported by the Telegraph) that: "Despite the contrary evidence given by soldiers, we have concluded that none of them fired in response to attacks or threatened attacks by nail or petrol bombers." The report added that no one threw, or threatened to throw, nail or petrol bombs at soldiers; The explanations given by soldiers were rejected, with a number said to have "knowingly put forward false accounts" Members of the so-called Official IRA fired a shot at troops, but missed their target, though crucially it was concluded it was the paratroopers who shot first on Bloody Sunday; ..The firing by soldiers of 1 Para caused the deaths of 13 people and injury to a similar number, none of whom was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury." This also applied to the 14th victim, who died later from injuries. The report added: "We found no instances where it appeared to us that soldiers either were or might have been justified in firing";
Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 8.52pm) How many people did Paisley kill, or even order to kill?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 26 Mar 17 9.54pm | |
---|---|
The man upped the ante hugely between 1968-1972 and was a key player in setting the stage for the paramilitary bloodbath that unfolded..
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 26 Mar 17 10.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
The man upped the ante hugely between 1968-1972 and was a key player in setting the stage for the paramilitary bloodbath that unfolded.. Yes, but how many people did Paisley kill, or even order to kill?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 26 Mar 17 10.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I think it's great that you spend so much time and energy highlighting the limitations of the British army and standing up for justice. Well done you. And in your eagerness to set the record straight, it's truly magnanimous of you to acknowledge the part McGuiness played in the blood shed. I do hope that you never need the flawed British Army to defend you. Boy, such bitterness me thinks. Its precisely the ability (and desirability where appropriate)of being able to criticise our leaders and military etc that sets us apart from totalitarian regimes....another of those traditional British values (like an independent judiciary) little Englanders tend to bang on about in theory but complain about in practice. Bloody Sunday (like Amritsar 1919,the Croke Park massacre,1920, Athens 1944 and Batang Kali 1948,as examples of other instances ) was bad and plain wrong.The day our military (notwithstanding some of the great things it has done) are immune from legitimate criticism is the day our traditional values fly out of the window.. Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 10.12pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 26 Mar 17 10.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Boy, such bitterness me thinks. Its precisely the ability (and desirability where appropriate)of being able to criticise our leaders and military etc that sets us apart from totalitarian regimes....another of those traditional British values (like an independent judiciary) little Englanders tend to bang on about in theory but complain about in practice. Bloody Sunday (like Amritsar 1919,the Croke Park massacre,1920, Athens 1944 and Batang Kali 1948,as examples of other other instances ) was bad and plain wrong.The day our military (notwithstanding some of the great things it has done) are immune from legitimate criticism is the day our traditional values fly out of the window.. Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 10.09pm) Who is saying Bloody Sunday was not bad, of course it was? However, Martin McGuinness was responsible for far more death, maiming and misery in Northern Ireland than the British Army and Ian Paisley put together. But you and the rest of the left wing dupes will not acknowledge it.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 26 Mar 17 10.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Who is saying Bloody Sunday was not bad, of course it was? However, Martin McGuinness was responsible for far more death, maiming and misery in Northern Ireland than the British Army and Ian Paisley put together. But you and the rest of the left wing dupes will not acknowledge it. Always with the sly digs. Interesting reading on the use of language... [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 26 Mar 17 10.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
I don't think anyone engaged in activity that justified the army's response. What happened was awful and unecessary but several witnesses claim to have seen him with a machine gun. Enough for the judge to think it was likely. However I am sure that happens on any peaceful demo. The IRA played their hand very well, the army didn't. Not helped by the fact that it was the Paras on the streets, a great highly trained and highly aggressive fighting force, unfortunately not what was required on the day. As for blood on his hands, because he wasn't prosecuted you think that makes him in the clear? Given the reputation for IRA discipline how can you explain the self proclaimed 2ic of the Belfast Brigade not having blood on his hands? He was remember a convicted member, for carrying a bomb. What do you think that was for? Fishing for pike?
Hi, 'Blood on their hands' could apply to any of the parties in this war. There are 2 terror offences against McGuinness for membership of the IRA and withholding information. Also petty offences obstruction some driving in the 80's with small fines. It looks like a kind of 'stop and search' with him occasionally having a go back. It does seem the police are not keen for him to lose his liberty tho, just keeping the pressure up. In my view he was not prosecuted again because there was nothing he would be convicted for and there must have been constant surveillance. His political success in driving the peace process a complete surprise of course we all thought he was a terrorist nutter being made Minister of Education but he turned it all around and there is plenty to thank him for quite remarkable. I think Scotland and Northern Ireland may leave the union quite soon. .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 26 Mar 17 11.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Hi, 'Blood on their hands' could apply to any of the parties in this war. There are 2 terror offences against McGuinness for membership of the IRA and withholding information. Also petty offences obstruction some driving in the 80's with small fines. It looks like a kind of 'stop and search' with him occasionally having a go back. It does seem the police are not keen for him to lose his liberty tho, just keeping the pressure up. In my view he was not prosecuted again because there was nothing he would be convicted for and there must have been constant surveillance. His political success in driving the peace process a complete surprise of course we all thought he was a terrorist nutter being made Minister of Education but he turned it all around and there is plenty to thank him for quite remarkable. I think Scotland and Northern Ireland may leave the union quite soon. . Would that render the Union Jack obsolete. That would upset a few Brexiters if that was an unintended consequence of voting leave.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 27 Mar 17 12.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Would that render the Union Jack obsolete. That would upset a few Brexiters if that was an unintended consequence of voting leave. Don't you have work in the morning?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Mar 17 12.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Don't you have work in the morning? Yep. And?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.