This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
bilbo 15 Nov 15 2.02pm | |
---|---|
Quote cornwalls palace at 15 Nov 2015 1.51pm
Quote bilbo at 15 Nov 2015 1.12pm
Quote cornwalls palace at 15 Nov 2015 12.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 15 Nov 2015 12.20pm
Quote serial thriller at 15 Nov 2015 11.49am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 14 Nov 2015 10.35am
RIVERS OF BLOOD.......... Enoch Powell..... April 1968. He was laughed at, shouted down even... and here we are nearly 50 years later talking about the very things he predicted happening in Paris. Jimenez was correct at the beginning of this thread... we are at war........ with Islam Kermit. Not just a few religious zealots or fundamentalists but with Islam itself... the whole ideology! Islam calls itself the religion of peace, but the holy Koran directs it's followers to kill all infidels (unbelievers)... but we hear so often that most followers don't take this as a literal instruction. Why have it in there then? How many other religions have such a clear message in it's scriptures to direct people to kill? The Holy Bible says "Thou Shalt Not Kill"... I'm not clued up on all religions though, but I doubt any others encourage bloodshed? Why do we tolerate the way Islam treats women as 2nd class citizens, forcing them to dress in Burkhas. denying them education and just being servants to the males? Female Genital Mutilation FFS! Why are they living here in a culture that is alien to their preachings... no alcohol, gay and lesbians, non halal meat eaters? These people that carried out tonight's atrocities were highly trained and part of a network that has been helped by the Paris/French Muslim community. They could not have carried out this level of terrorism without the so called moderates being aware of what was going down. Of course now we will hear from the Muslim Council of Great Britain (and/or their French counterparts)decrying the act and how it offends Muslims and their faith. We are at war and we need to adopt the same mindset of Churchill during WWII and start interning again those Muslims preaching hate rather than releasing them because Liberal namby pambys think it's a crime to do so. We also need to sort out ISIS (or whatever they call themselves) killing and destroying people and historical religious property in Syria and everywhere else they operate around the globe. Shut down their websites glorifying their deeds and attempts to radicalise and recruit young minds. Do we want blood on our streets? Luckily we were not as stupid as the rest of Europe and have tightened our border controls and beefed up our security and intelligence capabilities.... even though the Liberal minded regard this an "affront to their civil liberties" ! I think this will see a rise in UKIP's popularity again as well as many turning to BNP/EDL type political parties as they sense the likes of Corbyn and Labour will not even be dismayed by this outrage and blame ourselves, whilst Cameron speaks rhetoric about reprisals but not have the balls to actually do anything. I think Islam is like a wasp infestation - we are currently dealing with the problem by killing a few stray wasps with a rolled up newspaper. However we need to bring in the experts to destroy the nest! Or.... we can do nothing and slowly allow our population to be engulfed by Muslims and surrender to Sharia Law. It's our choice. Edited by Hoof Hearted (14 Nov 2015 10.37am)
Still waiting for your response to my burning question about terrorists masquerading as asylum seekers/refugees by the way.....
If others are religious that's for them but called as it is, religion is an affront to reality. To varying degrees a relic, so I don't want a world that's muslim, or christian for that matter.
Any religious or spiritual practice that is overly prescriptive rather than ssolely about how to improve yourself winds up being a disaster at one time or another.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 15 Nov 15 2.20pm | |
---|---|
I have Peter Hitchens down as one of my guilty pleasures and this article in the Mail shows what I mean. Sometimes people really surprise you and he has in this article:
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 15 Nov 15 2.28pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 15 Nov 2015 1.28pm
What those on the left have to realise is that no reasonable person blames migrants or Muslims in general for anything. It is just a question of the logic that says, if you let a thousand migrants in, one might be a terrorist. One terrorist, as we have seen, can kill many people. My daughter was going to that part of Paris last week but changed her mind.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 15 Nov 15 2.30pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 15 Nov 2015 1.54pm
Quote cornwalls palace at 15 Nov 2015 1.09pm
..but, not if everyone on earth thinks like a Nazi you knew the answer to that. If everyone thinks the moon is made of cheese is that a good thing? If everyone thinks that books that don't agree with official state dogma should be burned is that a good thing? If everyone thinks that Jews should be exterminated is that a good thing? Indeed the Nazis wished to turn the Poles into slaves so I'm not even sure that they envisioned a world with only them in it. Any society that replaces reason with dogma.....whether that dogma is religious or state leader inspired is a society that has turned its back on reason and the lessons of enlightenment. Keep Britain secular.
The point I'm trying to make is that to believe a religion is at fault for human vice is to think of religion as something fixed rather than as something fluid. Like all beliefs, it is something which is interpreted based on the environmental conditions in which it lives. The last caliphate, the Ottoman empire, was a place of religious pluralism, ethnic pluralism and tolerance of homosexuals, even while it shared many religious beliefs with IS. Why did they interpret the same holy scriptures and religious teachings so differently to those in Iraq and Syria currently? Probably because they lived in a (relatively) peaceful, prosperous society, rather than in a region which has been systematically carpet bombed for decades. I'm an atheist, and because I am an atheist I view religion not in a spiritual sense but as a product of particular human societies. But to punish all Muslims is to do the exact opposite; it is to suggest that their is something inherent, transcendental in their beliefs. That's why it's stupid to stop accepting asylum seekers after this attack on the grounds of their religion. Not only are you physically turning them back to the enemies we claim to share, but you are igniting an antagonism towards 'the West' in the refugees which IS absolutely thrive on.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 15 Nov 15 2.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 15 Nov 2015 1.28pm
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 15 Nov 15 2.37pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 15 Nov 2015 2.30pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 15 Nov 2015 1.54pm
Quote cornwalls palace at 15 Nov 2015 1.09pm
..but, not if everyone on earth thinks like a Nazi you knew the answer to that. If everyone thinks the moon is made of cheese is that a good thing? If everyone thinks that books that don't agree with official state dogma should be burned is that a good thing? If everyone thinks that Jews should be exterminated is that a good thing? Indeed the Nazis wished to turn the Poles into slaves so I'm not even sure that they envisioned a world with only them in it. Any society that replaces reason with dogma.....whether that dogma is religious or state leader inspired is a society that has turned its back on reason and the lessons of enlightenment. Keep Britain secular.
The point I'm trying to make is that to believe a religion is at fault for human vice is to think of religion as something fixed rather than as something fluid. Like all beliefs, it is something which is interpreted based on the environmental conditions in which it lives. The last caliphate, the Ottoman empire, was a place of religious pluralism, ethnic pluralism and tolerance of homosexuals, even while it shared many religious beliefs with IS. Why did they interpret the same holy scriptures and religious teachings so differently to those in Iraq and Syria currently? Probably because they lived in a (relatively) peaceful, prosperous society, rather than in a region which has been systematically carpet bombed for decades. I'm an atheist, and because I am an atheist I view religion not in a spiritual sense but as a product of particular human societies. But to punish all Muslims is to do the exact opposite; it is to suggest that their is something inherent, transcendental in their beliefs. That's why it's stupid to stop accepting asylum seekers after this attack on the grounds of their religion. Not only are you physically turning them back to the enemies we claim to share, but you are igniting an antagonism towards 'the West' in the refugees which IS absolutely thrive on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bilbo 15 Nov 15 3.07pm | |
---|---|
Quote OldFella at 14 Nov 2015 10.36pm
Quote bilbo at 14 Nov 2015 5.51pm
From those on the left with pie in the sky ideas about allowing extremist clerics to speak and therefore warp minds in our country, to others on the right who supported equally naive failed attempts to democratise the middle east, we've never really had a sensible way of dealing with this issue. We don't 'get' that these cultures aren't like our own. Overthrowing Saddam and Gadaffi, and weakening Assad's regime through various channels has been a complete f***ing disaster. They aren't countries that can be controlled by rosy cheeked pleasant PMs. These dictators aren't the deranged figures they are painted to be, they behave this way as its the only way to rule there. With them in place at least these struggles were sometimes contained to regions and we also had a 'go to' to bargain with or put sanctions on when needs be. Now there is no such go to. Where there are power vacuums, you are rewarded for being the most vicious c***s going and thats what we see now, then others begin to adopt this mindset through fear or a lust for power. This isn't a "aren't we terrible to invade this or that country" comment, that's already happened so the morality one way or the other is an irrelevance to this matter. It's an observation that we have acted against our own interests and safety in terms of foreign policy. Where we are now our best bet would be to, alongside other countries, ramp things up in Syria against ISIS to extinguish the threat as much as humanly possible but not insist that Assad goes. He's the only show in town. I don't care who's in power as long as they can try to keep a lid on these b******s. We won't benefit by making the same mistake again. At home, while we definitely need to ensure that we don't adopt a 'all muslims are the enemy' mindset or go overboard in placing restrictions on the entire population, we would be very wise to keep refugee restrictions in place and it's understandable if France and others do the same. It's just too risky to do otherwise and is placing idealism over the safety of the population. Just in my opinion, the above post is the most intelligent and accurate that I have ever read on HOL, bar none. I worked in and for Middle Eastern companies for c 30 years, and Bilbo's comments on Saddam and Gaddafi are pretty much spot on. And can be extended to Mubarak in Egypt. I usually confine my comments to "wally alert" or similar. Not from arrogance, just where I smell a wally. So you don't need to post it here... But here I feel very strongly about not starting wars that cannot be finished. The IS caliphate is a product of Bush, Blair and similar parties' ill advised military action - but IS now needs to be obliterated. If that means supporting Assad for the time being, that is a price that we should be prepared to pay. It really is a generational struggle. I do not want my children (all 9 of them!) and grandchildren to live in an Islamic Republic/Caliphate of Europe. Some of the Corbynistas and HOL lefties may not see it this way - but anyone with cojones hopefully will.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 15 Nov 15 3.25pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnno42000 at 15 Nov 2015 2.20pm
I have Peter Hitchens down as one of my guilty pleasures and this article in the Mail shows what I mean. Sometimes people really surprise you and he has in this article:
"Could we please skip the empty bravado? This is a time for grief above all else, and a time to refrain from soundbites and posturing. France – our closest neighbour, oldest friend, beloved rival, what Philip Sidney called ‘that sweet enemy’ – France is stricken, and we should weep with her.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 15 Nov 15 3.44pm | |
---|---|
Quote serial thriller at 15 Nov 2015 2.30pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 15 Nov 2015 1.54pm
Quote cornwalls palace at 15 Nov 2015 1.09pm
..but, not if everyone on earth thinks like a Nazi you knew the answer to that. If everyone thinks the moon is made of cheese is that a good thing? If everyone thinks that books that don't agree with official state dogma should be burned is that a good thing? If everyone thinks that Jews should be exterminated is that a good thing? Indeed the Nazis wished to turn the Poles into slaves so I'm not even sure that they envisioned a world with only them in it. Any society that replaces reason with dogma.....whether that dogma is religious or state leader inspired is a society that has turned its back on reason and the lessons of enlightenment. Keep Britain secular.
The point I'm trying to make is that to believe a religion is at fault for human vice is to think of religion as something fixed rather than as something fluid. Like all beliefs, it is something which is interpreted based on the environmental conditions in which it lives. The last caliphate, the Ottoman empire, was a place of religious pluralism, ethnic pluralism and tolerance of homosexuals, even while it shared many religious beliefs with IS. Why did they interpret the same holy scriptures and religious teachings so differently to those in Iraq and Syria currently? Probably because they lived in a (relatively) peaceful, prosperous society, rather than in a region which has been systematically carpet bombed for decades. I'm an atheist, and because I am an atheist I view religion not in a spiritual sense but as a product of particular human societies. But to punish all Muslims is to do the exact opposite; it is to suggest that their is something inherent, transcendental in their beliefs. That's why it's stupid to stop accepting asylum seekers after this attack on the grounds of their religion. Not only are you physically turning them back to the enemies we claim to share, but you are igniting an antagonism towards 'the West' in the refugees which IS absolutely thrive on.
It would be easier if you stuck to the arguments I made rather than extrapolate and then discuss different points that I haven't. I will refer to some points however before I need to attend to tomorrow's work. A secular society can take many forms. It has developed since it's had a chance to the point where certain aspects of what secularists have fought for have created a modern society that's very attractive to many. Eugenics is an area of interest to me and an exciting avenue for future human improvement. Misuse and errors in its applications from previous centuries ago have harmed its reputation but it has the potential to cure many of societies ills. As for the Ottoman sultans, or caliphs, in the 18th and 19th centuries, it's true that they launched secular schools and promoted the education of women and had homosexuality decriminalised in 1858...Neither of which was a popular move amongst their far more religious populations it has to be said. The period of reformation known as the Tanzimat saw customary and religious laws being replaced in favour of secular European ones. However, this has to be seen as one period of the Ottoman empire and definitely not representative of all of it.....However, despite being officially Islamic it has to be said that for most of the time the empire didn't take this title seriously until it saw its power crumbling......Then perhaps you wouldn't have waxed so happily over it. Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Nov 2015 3.45pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 15 Nov 15 3.50pm | |
---|---|
Sadly Peter is no Christopher.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 15 Nov 15 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Are passports bomb proof? My understanding is that most of the terrorists blew themselves up. How did the passports survive. Or am I missing something?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bilbo 15 Nov 15 4.05pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 15 Nov 2015 4.00pm
Are passports bomb proof? My understanding is that most of the terrorists blew themselves up. How did the passports survive. Or am I missing something?
Edited by bilbo (15 Nov 2015 4.06pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.