It's going to be interesting.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Did you actually watch Geoffrey Cox, or just read the twitter post?

I thought he was an embarrassment to himself. He is clearly an educated, decent man who understands and upholds the rule of law. However, he was working to a prepared position that I am sure we will hear time and again in the coming weeks. "This Parliament is dead. It opposes the will of the people". I am pretty sure, from his body language, that he doesn't believe it, and that he doesn't think it to be a wise strategy.

His "attacks" were all theoretical soundbites designed for 10 second news clips and Daily Mail headlines. He lost all credibility in my eyes.

This idea that this the government is trying, against all the "establishment" forces assembled against them, which now includes the Supreme Court, to do the will of the people is disingenuous, irresponsible and dangerous. It needs to be called out for the sham it is. Parliament is just trying to do it's job, nothing more or less, and it was the government action which was trying to stop them. Action that has now been determined by a unanimous verdict of the highest court to be unlawful. There's the shame. Where is the apology? Doubling down is Trumpian tactics. Do we really want to accept that?

I am thoroughly ashamed that a government formed in the name of a great party that I once respected, has sunk to such a low point.

I still hope that those behind the scenes who manage the Tory party and it's finances will pull the rug from under these tactics before any more harm is done.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Actually the supreme court perceived that prorogation was to prevent discussion about brexit.
There is nothing that can prove it was to do that.
Maybe another 5 weeks gabbling on about what is and isnt going to happen will wear down the leavers, who knows.
Bottom line the deal or no deal cannot be done outside of Brussels.

Fantastic, he speaks for so many people.
Good for him.

Really??? As someone who insists on evidence from others you can impute opinion and intention from body language?
Isn’t it possible that as the government’s top legal adviser he was simply embarrassed at getting things wrong?

So says the man who rushes to get a laughable hard-on for throwing his (perceived) weight around by criticising others for petty squabbling.

As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game...