It obviously is for some people!

As he accepts. He also accepts the Judges were entirely correct to create new Law in this circumstance.

The problem you don't seem to be recognising here is that unless we leave all these 'vetos' you talk about are subject to decisions by the EU commission based upon what treaty there is. EU leaders have already made it plain that an EU military separate from NATO is how they want to go.....Are you seriously suggesting that when the time for a vote on that comes they are going to have vetos?

Pray tell me, what opportunity was the public given on any of the treaties UK governments signed up to? Yet it's clear to see that there was never popular support for most of the later ones.

Hell the public only received this referendum opportunity via a Prime Minister trying to shore up internal support....there was zero parliamentary will for giving the public a say on the EU at all.

The longer we leave...leaving as it were then the more beaten down and demographically shifted the country becomes. Unless the UK leaves now, it's not going to get that opportunity again.

Then all your talk about no EU army and veto this or veto that soon becomes antiquated.

This isn't entirely true. The mooted common defence policy, again if you do some reading, is very very different to a Federal army.

Also, any treaty that forced all member states to sign up to an EU Army system would never pass. Yes, on something as sensitive as eliminating member states independent armed forces, there would be vetos, and it would need to be 100% agreed, at least to implement it as a EU wide policy. To say otherwise is unrealistic, fantasy and fearmongering.

I assume you're referring to the Lisbon treaty, the facts of which have been massively abused by various influencers for the usual ad clicks and follows.

Main points being

• The UK also doesn’t have to participate in EU legislation relating to justice and home affairs, but can choose to opt-in if it wants to.

• On issues that require unanimity, it’s the case that simply abstaining from a vote does not stop it passing (the Lisbon Treaty did not change this), but states can still veto by voting against.

• The UK still has an opt out on the Euro

• Nowhere in the Lisbon treaty is an 'EU Army' or 'Federal Army' mentioned.

To add, given the significant amount of grief this entire process has caused politics and politicians, if you really believe that a UK govt would simply go 'Yeah, alright, let's do it without telling anyone', surely you're mad. Or a little too partisan, at least on this particular issue.

The public feeling on retaining our own identity, let alone currency/army, would be loud and challenging. Whoever passed those little doozys without so much as a thought to due process would be voted out straightaway. It would be political suicide.

She did no more and no less than her constitutional duty. She followed the advice given to her, as by convention she must, and it is that advice alone that has been determined as illegal.

So I don't believe she is involved in any way.

'Boris bus' maker Wrightbus goes into administration
Collapse puts more than 1,400 jobs at risk and is second major UK insolvency this week

Another day of Johnson, another disaster.