This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
JL85 London,SE9 24 Sep 19 7.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
How much do we pay in? Can they afford to lose that? Please expand.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 24 Sep 19 7.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Alex1991
Of course not, I knew it existed and copied the exact wording so you could read it. What part of this is not the whole truth ? The facts are right there in front of you and you are still denying it ? Freddie Starr has been eating my hamster.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 24 Sep 19 7.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JL85
Hmmm, are you prepared to back this statement up with some facts? Happy to be proved wrong. May help, may not..............
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 24 Sep 19 7.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
I voted on June 23rd in absolute good faith that the result would be acted upon. And three and half years later we are here, with a Parliament and a Judiciary that is doing everything in its power to make a fool out of me for holding such beliefs on that day. Backed up by idiots who are trying to pull a three-card trick on me by way of seeing my vote deemed utterly worthless whilst trying to maintain their own self-illusion as the good guys in this s*** show. If you want the result on June 23rd ignored, you are a w***er of the highest order. As simple and straight forward as that.
Edited by Matov (24 Sep 2019 7.23pm) I don’t want it ignored, I want it carried out in the least damaging way possible. This government have made a total clusterf*ck of it and where we are already has caused irreparable damage, wherever we end up now. I agree with you that it not being carried through represents a miscarriage of democracy; and I am loathe to be on politicians’ side, but the majority of the dissenters have been doing so because it’s what they think is in the country’s best long term interests. This decision today is because the government have acted illegally. We have a proud and historic judicial and parliamentary system which stops the government acting beyond the reach of the law. If the government are allowed to act above the law we are entering the realms of a dictatorship. The law is there for a reason. No one has yet addressed my earlier point about the prorogue of Parliament being given as not being about Brexit and to give the new PM time to establish policy before the Queen’s Speech. This whole entire reaction just proves the *unanimous* decision today was correct.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 Sep 19 7.50pm | |
---|---|
I wonder when we will get, 'Brexit the Movie'. Probably will be constantly delayed.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 24 Sep 19 7.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
I don’t want it ignored, I want it carried out in the least damaging way possible. This government have made a total clusterf*ck of it and where we are already has caused irreparable damage, wherever we end up now. I agree with you that it not being carried through represents a miscarriage of democracy; and I am loathe to be on politicians’ side, but the majority of the dissenters have been doing so because it’s what they think is in the country’s best long term interests. This decision today is because the government have acted illegally. We have a proud and historic judicial and parliamentary system which stops the government acting beyond the reach of the law. If the government are allowed to act above the law we are entering the realms of a dictatorship. The law is there for a reason. No one has yet addressed my earlier point about the prorogue of Parliament being given as not being about Brexit and to give the new PM time to establish policy before the Queen’s Speech. This whole entire reaction just proves the *unanimous* decision today was correct. The government is accused of acting illegally despite the Attorney General telling them their action would be legal. Whose advice should they have taken if not his?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 24 Sep 19 7.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The government is accused of acting illegally despite the Attorney General telling them their action would be legal. Whose advice should they have taken if not his? His should be the first, of many, heads that should roll. Also, not ‘accused’ any more. They HAVE acted illegally, as ruled by the highest court in the country. Edited by DanH (24 Sep 2019 7.54pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 24 Sep 19 7.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
I don’t want it ignored, I want it carried out in the least damaging way possible. This government have made a total clusterf*ck of it and where we are already has caused irreparable damage, wherever we end up now. I agree with you that it not being carried through represents a miscarriage of democracy; and I am loathe to be on politicians’ side, but the majority of the dissenters have been doing so because it’s what they think is in the country’s best long term interests. This decision today is because the government have acted illegally. We have a proud and historic judicial and parliamentary system which stops the government acting beyond the reach of the law. If the government are allowed to act above the law we are entering the realms of a dictatorship. The law is there for a reason. No one has yet addressed my earlier point about the prorogue of Parliament being given as not being about Brexit and to give the new PM time to establish policy before the Queen’s Speech. This whole entire reaction just proves the *unanimous* decision today was correct. And so what!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 Sep 19 7.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
His should be the first, of many, heads that should roll. Also, not ‘accused’ any more. They HAVE acted illegally, as ruled by the highest court in the country. Edited by DanH (24 Sep 2019 7.54pm) Errrr....This act was approved by the Queen. The courts have literally said an act she approved was illegal....they have stepped into the political sphere....So now so should the Queen. The session brought to an end was one of the longest in parliamentary history. A general election will kick out these weasels. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Sep 2019 7.59pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 24 Sep 19 7.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Errrr....This act was approved by the Queen. The courts have literally said an act she approved was illegal. The session brought to an end was one of the longest in parliamentary history. Do you understand the ‘role’ the Queen has in giving Royal Assent? Also, if not, then you believe that Boris has literally lied to the Queen. Heads have literally rolled for less in the past. Edited by DanH (24 Sep 2019 7.59pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 24 Sep 19 7.58pm | |
---|---|
I think Parliament will assert itself over the government, and that the UK will remain in the EU. There is a real power shift here to parliament.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 Sep 19 8.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Do you understand the ‘role’ the Queen has in giving Royal Assent? She has the power to approve it or turn it down. The fact that the Queen has decided to be window dressing is not law. Her father....who she is meant to admire.....involved himself far more. The courts have embarrassed her and she should re-assert herself.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.