This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 24 Sep 19 4.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Alex1991
So 52% voted Leave, and within that 52% you have millions of people with a different view on how Brexit would happen. That 52% would have included a lot of people whose decision was close either way. This vote is now being hijacked by hard line Brexiteer's who are trying to tell people that this is what they voted for and blaming the EU for not giving them the trade deal they promised without having the knowledge it could be agreed. That's a bit one eyed. A lot of those 48 percent weren't actually fans of remaining in the EU but were frightened into it by project fear....a project that made lots of predictions for what would happen to our economy after the vote which didn't happen. If remain had only those pro EU voters to rely on they would have barely got to thirty percent if that. Lots of them want the EU to reform when the reality is the EU won't reform without actions like Brexit....and even then its path is seemingly set. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Sep 2019 4.39pm) Attachment: EU1.JPG (65.83Kb)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 Sep 19 4.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Alex1991
Leaving was not compulsory. It was an advisory referendum. So was the one which saw us join the EEC.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Alex1991 Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
A deal is not compulsory. That was never on the ballot paper. Leave or Remain was. Remain lost. The only valid debate is over the type of Leave but we should be out now. Extending it anymore only creates more uncertainty and upheaval. Be honest. You want A50 revoked. Be a Lib-Dem and sing that from the rooftops. But please don't insult our intelligence by hiding that. You are actually completely wrong about this. The best outcome now is that a decent deal is agreed. I don't want article 50 to be revoked, but if there is no movement on a deal and it is between no deal or revoking article 50 then yes, I'd want to revoke article 50.
"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 24 Sep 19 4.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Alex1991
Leaving was not compulsory. It was an advisory referendum. Absolutely. So let Parliament revoke it. But, and I accept I am a little tedious about this, celebrate that. Cheer it on. I can respect that. What I loathe is this vomit-inducing desire to give yourselves a cloak of democratic justification by way of another referendum when you are simply not willing to have the one on June 23rd honoured. You dont get a second go. Cheer on a Parliament that has the courage to revoke A50 if you believe it should ignore 17.4 million votes. Believe in this system. Express your desire for it to act in accordance with your wishes.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Sep 19 4.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Alex1991
So you'd like to crash out without a deal and then re assess after the fact ? Seriously? I regard honouring the referendum result as paramount. A 'no deal' would not remain so for long as no one benefits from a halt of trade with Europe. The people driving the second referendum nonsense know this full well.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Alex1991 Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Absolutely. So let Parliament revoke it. But, and I accept I am a little tedious about this, celebrate that. Cheer it on. I can respect that. What I loathe is this vomit-inducing desire to give yourselves a cloak of democratic justification by way of another referendum when you are simply not willing to have the one on June 23rd honoured. You dont get a second go. Cheer on a Parliament that has the courage to revoke A50 if you believe it should ignore 17.4 million votes. Believe in this system. Express your desire for it to act in accordance with your wishes. If the Brexit that was campaigned for was the Brexit that could actually be delivered I would be all for it. This is not the case, it will never be the case, and yet people are still clinging on to an ill advised and ill conceived referendum, the sole purpose of which was to shore up David Cameron's position.
"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Alex1991 Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Seriously? I regard honouring the referendum result as paramount. A 'no deal' would not remain so for long as no one benefits from a halt of trade with Europe. The people driving the second referendum nonsense know this full well. How do you know this ? Surely if a trade deal was as important to Europe as you think it is then this deal would have done 3 years ago.
"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Sep 19 4.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
'Proper Brexit' was definitely not on the ballot paper. I do wonder how many types of Brexit there are now... The same applies to 'no deal'.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Sep 19 4.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Alex1991
How do you know this ? Surely if a trade deal was as important to Europe as you think it is then this deal would have done 3 years ago. No. That is called negotiating.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 4.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The same applies to 'no deal'. Precisely.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Alex1991 Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. That is called negotiating. So part of a negotiation is putting yourself in a bad situation in the hope that afterwards you'll get the deal you want ? Do you really believe that we'll get a better deal once we leave ? Or will we in fact get a much worse deal than the one that is on the table now because we have zero bargaining position.
"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 4.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Alex1991
How do you know this ? Surely if a trade deal was as important to Europe as you think it is then this deal would have done 3 years ago. Europe will without question start negotiations after a no-deal exit. However in my view it's the worst, most unnecessarily disruptive way to go about it. This is the point people are missing – once we leave on the 31st we then have to negotiate trade arrangements which could take at least another two years. Once we're 'out' all this dross is going to keep rumbling on for the foreseeable. End one procrastinating nightmare only to begin the next... Leaving without a deal just means that process will take longer, at least it will with regards to the EU.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.