This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Apr 20 3.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Perhaps in a years time we might have a better idea but nothing definite until the end of 2021 going into the Spring of 2022. Problem is that politically the notion of Herd Immunity, and what that means in terms of actually wanting wide scale infection is a no-no. Telling people they have to catch it and then move on with their lives is far to brutal a fact for our current society to accept. But that's the truth of it. More deaths now might actually be a sign of getting this right.
Just wondered how why that’s your opinion when we’ve chosen lockdown. If we were in no lockdown I’d immediate see the logic. It’s a very complex situation so there’s various ways of viewing all parts of it. Unless you mean another country having more deaths now via herd immunity or no lockdown.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 11 Apr 20 3.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
It might be the virus stays in the body longer and the tests aren’t picking it up. True and is this not some of the problem? No-one really knew that much about the virus before it hit
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 11 Apr 20 3.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
What are you looking for come the end of all this then? Easy to snipe at others but throw your hat is the ring for what successful government management of this pandemic looks like. The assertion was that we should be at the bottom of the death list. I said we may yet be. Where is the sniping? We won’t know which approach is/was most successful for a long time to come.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Apr 20 3.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
Give us something concrete then rather than waffle, success to you will look like less than 100,000 deaths and avoiding a recession? Is that a fair summary of your stance? Edited by SavoyTruffle (11 Apr 2020 3.02pm) I like your desire for measurable actuali....though I stated what I thought mattered rather than waffled. I don't think we can avoid a recession, that's already nailed on. The only question is how long it goes on...and I have my fingers crossed on that. Come on MMT! Pull us out of this mess. In terms of deaths it depends upon how long before we get a mass produced vaccine.....So any number is going to be guesswork. But if you insist on a number... going with no mass produced vaccine being injected into us until February with given our population denisity and herd immunity I'd estimate around 120,000 deaths..if you're going to head back to work it's reasonably independent of what route you took (excepting successful early and permanent lockdown).
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 11 Apr 20 3.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think the total number of deaths will be less the result of governmental action and more cultural practice. I became convinced of this from Japan's statistics, which you can then compare to less stand offish nations. So unless your population density is very low then the spread is going to occur with a very infectious disease such as this. Personally my view has always been that after an initial early partial lockdown to secure borders, isolate the vulnerable within the government's reach and inject NHS funding my approach is that herd immunity is the only practical approach that can be taken. So unless a country is going to spend the entire time in lockdown until a vaccine then the virus deaths will differ dependent upon cultural practices and population density. I view the UK approach as a very expensive attempted lockdown, where in reality herd immunity continued just slower than in say Sweden. So, in my view, the countries that spent less and did their best on promoting and implementing the best hygiene practices are those that will be historically elevated the most. Sweden's curve might peak higher but it will also lower far quicker. It will have spent far less and its deaths like most countries will be culturally and density dependent. I don't believe that history will view the creation of a world recession as being the appropriate response to a new virus with a kill rate of two to three percent. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Apr 2020 2.10pm) Maybe we had the virus in the UK sometime before it was realised. Do we actually know when it reared it's ugly head in China? (not just when they officially reported it). My wife had a persistent cough early in February, before it all really kicked off, she works for Border Force and was therefore dealing with people from all over, who really knows?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 11 Apr 20 3.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Just wondered how why that’s your opinion when we’ve chosen lockdown. If we were in no lockdown I’d immediate see the logic. It’s a very complex situation so there’s various ways of viewing all parts of it. Unless you mean another country having more deaths now via herd immunity or no lockdown. Lockdown was primarily about spreading out the deaths, not reducing them. And we held out longer than a lot of others, keeping schools open in particular. The harsh realities of new viruses like this are that people will die from them. When people go into hospital they are not going to be treated, merely given more of a chance of staying alive long enough for their own bodies to fight it. I suspect that ideally, we would have avoided lock-down for a week or two longer because you want it embedded in the community to achieve the 50% plus infection you need for herd immunity to kick in come the second wave in the autumn. Lets see what happens but until we are past the 2021-2022 winter it is impossible to see who got it right. But avoiding this disease for most people is counter productive. I concede I am a lunatic on matters like this and perhaps think too coldly but we might have been better off deliberately infecting young healthy people in large numbers whilst forcing the vulnerable to remain behind closed doors. Also, to put it bluntly, people do die of all sorts of things and we do not stop the cause. Driving for example. How many people die on the roads every year?
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Apr 20 3.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
For me there is no point in look at any stats for actual answers to who got it right and who did not until the end of 2021. The virus will fade as we go into the summer anyway, only to re-emerge come October. Perhaps in a years time we might have a better idea but nothing definite until the end of 2021 going into the Spring of 2022. Problem is that politically the notion of Herd Immunity, and what that means in terms of actually wanting wide scale infection is a no-no. Telling people they have to catch it and then move on with their lives is far to brutal a fact for our current society to accept. But that's the truth of it. More deaths now might actually be a sign of getting this right. Edited by Matov (11 Apr 2020 2.48pm) Yep, there are a lot of people making bold and certain statements, including me. To an extent that's natural. However, you are of course correct, we won't really know until it's all done and dusted. Still, we all know that forums are about opinions. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Apr 2020 3.27pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Apr 20 3.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Maybe we had the virus in the UK sometime before it was realised. Do we actually know when it reared it's ugly head in China? (not just when they officially reported it). My wife had a persistent cough early in February, before it all really kicked off, she works for Border Force and was therefore dealing with people from all over, who really knows? Quite. Many will just accept what the media and government tell them and a lot...especially the younger...won't even really take much notice of that. You just hope that most older and vulnerable people are isolating (though in many circumstances that's only going to be partially possible) and that families work-around to help protect them. On the flip side you hope that the young have caught it, as Matov said...despite the government's attempts to stop that.....and that we have already built up a certain level of herd immunity in the population.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Apr 20 3.36pm | |
---|---|
Is there any certainty or even confidence a hot summer will dampen down or kill off the virus or a first wave of it like the flu? Has that happened in the Southern Hemisphere?
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 11 Apr 20 3.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Yep, there are a lot of people making bold and certain statements, including me. To an extent that's natural. However, you are of course correct, we won't really know until it's all done and dusted. Still, we all know that forums are about opinions. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Apr 2020 3.27pm) Absolutely. But the wider consequences of how the world has reacted to this pandemic are almost beyond comprehension. An economic back-lash that will probably be the worst crisis the western world has ever faced and I genuinely believe that more lives will cut short because of that than people who will die of this wretched virus. Just a look at the stats in terms of spikes in unemployment, drops in national GDPs and the huge growth in Government debts are simply eye-watering. And I do not use that term lightly. There is no VE day moment around this. Even if we come up with a vaccine in the next 12 months, there will be a global tetchiness that will last for the entire decade. This is one of those tipping points that history is defined by. There is no return to the norm. Perhaps I am guilty of hyperbole but the more I try to take in what is happening, the more wary I become of what lies ahead for us all.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 11 Apr 20 3.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Is there any certainty or even confidence a hot summer will dampen down or kill off the virus or a first wave of it like the flu? Has that happened in the Southern Hemisphere? All communicable disease, with perhaps the exception of venereal, tends to fade in the summer months for a whole host of reasons. And pandemics of this nature do come in waves. Better to have the worst of it going into summer than winter because of the less demand on health services as the weather gets warmer. The key factor here is that as a species we have no natural defence to this Covid-19 beyond our own bodies ability to produce anti-bodies. That is it. I suspect that it will have a fatality rate of less than 1 in 1000 (and possibly even less than that). If you are not in a at-risk group then deliberately seeking it out now is a no brainer. But no politician is going to stand up and push that.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Apr 20 3.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Is there any certainty or even confidence a hot summer will dampen down or kill off the virus or a first wave of it like the flu? Has that happened in the Southern Hemisphere? It traditionally happens with flu as we know....more people's immune systems seem stronger in the summer....probably dealing with less daily pathogen attacks. Maybe the warmer weather isn't as kind to pathogens that are living in vapor. Here is the current rundown of countries, which contains how the hotter countries are doing.....though outside of the first world you have to wonder on the reliability of the stats....plus as you know countries like China will lie anyway.
Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Apr 2020 3.53pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.