This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
W12 24 Sep 19 2.15pm | |
---|---|
As David Starkey puts this - we are now under the rule of Lawyers
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 24 Sep 19 2.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Parliament wishes to stop a no-deal Brexit from happening, not brexit entirely. Nope
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 2.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
[Tweet Link] He's correct on the reason behind the ruling but the intent is clear. JRM clarifiying this actually does more damage to those pretending it had no relation to Brexit. Also do you post anything other than tweets? Stuff of value, like, y'know, personally constructed intellectual debate and opinion from said tweets would be a good start. Otherwise it's just unfiltered, low context propaganda.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 2.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
Nope Simply, yep. If you're partisan and a religious brelieber, then nope.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 2.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
As David Starkey puts this - we are now under the rule of Lawyers When the law needs to be involved, it gets involved. That's why it's the law. Although I reckon most Brexiteers would rather a dictatorship.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 2.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
I want to do that. Johnson wants to do that. Corbyn claims to want to that as does every other supposed 'leader'. So why aint it happening? Why is your precious Parilamentary democracy so scared of a GE? Lets have it as soon as possible and lets have all the main players make a pledge to actually HONOUR what they claim they will over Brexit. You want this to end without bloodshed and for us all to move on then this is the only course of action open. So you'd accept the outcome of the GE? I doubt it. I'm not sure how you could, as it would effectively go against your own principles. Also, again, I definitely think you're overstating the case when it comes to significant civil unrest. No one cares enough. They're too comfortable.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 24 Sep 19 2.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
So just to clarify, Remain protests have been justified; up to and including throwing milkshakes on Brexit politicians. Brexit protests will not be justified. What will be funny is how many of the turncoat politicians are about to lose their jobs. Of course not. Direct action, however how juvenile in nature, can ever be justified whatever the political belief behind it. You won't find me defending it. Personally I prefer the power of ridicule exposing hypocrisy. So the Trump baby seemed pretty good to me.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 Sep 19 2.33pm | |
---|---|
What these judges have done is unprecedented. It just confirms what I already knew about the elites. Parliament is ultimately prorogued by the Monarch, it's her Parliament. If she consented it is by definition constitutional. Leave was a majority working class decision being refused by a majority elite remainer class. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Sep 2019 2.34pm) Attachment: EU1.JPG (65.83Kb)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 24 Sep 19 2.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am happy that the law has spoken and my contention that Parliament is supreme has been supported, as it always was going to be. That my posts have been "long winded" and repetitive has only been necessary because so many have refused to acknowledge this. That some still do is really unfortunate but won't change anything. If you don't like the law, change the law. To do that you need to vote in a Parliament who agrees with you. That's the way it is done and not via "civil unrest". Peaceful protests and well put arguments will help Parliament change their mind. It's up to you to convince people. I am not convinced you will be able to do it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 24 Sep 19 2.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
As David Starkey puts this - we are now under the rule of Lawyers David Starkey that balanced, objective "historian" whose nickname in some informed circles is apparently "Starkers"? We have all always been under the rule of lawyers who then become Judges and uphold the laws that Parliament enact on our behalf. That's our democracy at work. Nothing more, or less.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 24 Sep 19 2.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
So you'd accept the outcome of the GE? I doubt it. I'm not sure how you could, as it would effectively go against your own principles. Also, again, I definitely think you're overstating the case when it comes to significant civil unrest. No one cares enough. They're too comfortable.
And makes that moral high ground you Remainers seem to love standing atop have at least a dollop more solidity to it. All I have ever asked for is honesty in this process. We were told, prior to June 23rd 2016, that our decision would be acted upon. No ifs or buts or what ifs or nuance. A simple Leave or Remain question with every voted equally counted. An exercise in pure democracy. And it was done and dusted. A huge turnout, a clear majority for Leave with no serious qualms about how the votes were either cast or counted. Then a GE in which 80% of the votes were cast for Parties promising to honour that result. And here we are now. A cluster-f*** but with a single get out of jail card for free offered. A GE on the table. Would I stop campaigning/sounding off for us to leave the EU? Then no. But at least you have something solid to throw back at my rantings. If there is a Parliment with a majority of MP's elected on the back of manifesto promises to not honour the 2016 result then you actually have an arguement to make for us not leaving or a second referendum. Still leaves a NASTY taste in my mouth and the wider faith in our political system damaged even more than it is but at least you can still make a case that voting matters. But instead, we are not having a GE as things stand. You are effectively celebrating the will of 17.4 million people being ignored. In some cases, Remainers are even cheering on the death of some of those voters. And more than happy to throw all sorts of insults at them because they had the audacity to make the effort to vote and then expect the promises made to them to be honoured. There is one last mechanism with a shred of democratic legitimacy left to resolve this. And as of today, it is not happening. When it does, then I will give you a definite answer. But at the moment, all that matters is that Remainers appear unwilling to accept the result on June 23rd.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 24 Sep 19 2.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by the silurian
Then you would be failing to do what I believe is your constitutional duty. Actually I don't want Brexit cancelled! I want Parliament to decide how we proceed. If that means, in what I regard as a very unlikely scenario, that we now remain then I will accept their decision. If the country votes in a new Parliament which decides to vote to leave without a deal then I will accept that decision. If they decide to negotiate an alternative arrangement which means we leave and the people are consulted directly on whether to accept it, I will accept their decision. It's Parliament's job and not mine. My job, along with your's, is to help choose the Parliament. If you decide not to take part then that's your decision but one I would regret you making.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.