This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Apr 20 9.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Actually, it would be very refreshing to be proved wrong. That would mean that for once, one of you actually provided some incontrovertible evidence of something instead of just spewing out a lot of old guff. Oh I really don't think that would be too difficult. In my opinion of course. I somehow doubt though that your opinion of the proof would be the same. That's opinions for you. What's incontrovertible to some isn't for others. What's a "load of old guff" for some is hard fact to others. I am not even going to try now because diversions and pettiness are off my agenda. The only reason for my comment was to encourage others to take it off their's.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 11 Apr 20 9.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
In South Korea some patients are testing positive for a second time. Not unusual to get a bug twice but time will tell if immunity is strong enough to fight it off. If not then the only hope is a vaccine or treatment drug. This is the real test on if herd immunity is even going to work. Ask Prof Jimmy Whitworth. Probably untrue. If true the second infection not being passed on to others.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Apr 20 10.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Oh I really don't think that would be too difficult. In my opinion of course. I somehow doubt though that your opinion of the proof would be the same. That's opinions for you. What's incontrovertible to some isn't for others. What's a "load of old guff" for some is hard fact to others. I am not even going to try now because diversions and pettiness are off my agenda. The only reason for my comment was to encourage others to take it off their's.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Apr 20 10.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I take your point. Facts ought to be facts but in today's Trumpian world there is now significant blurring. Alternative facts now exist, in the minds of some people anyway.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Apr 20 10.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I take your point. Facts ought to be facts but in today's Trumpian world there is now significant blurring. Alternative facts now exist, in the minds of some people anyway. I think you will find that the blurring of facts has existed since humans existed.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 11 Apr 20 10.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Ask Prof Jimmy Whitworth. Probably untrue. If true the second infection not being passed on to others. True and if the second wave is not contagious then it's good news but if some people get bad again then immunity isnt guaranteed.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
mezzer Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 11 Apr 20 11.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Very true. I’ll concede that it’s expected or predictable that those who understand the lockdown use deaths now whereas those who support no lockdown really have to use a ‘‘we’ll see’’ stance because none of the countries can be compared to us. It takes a few days for it to sink home. We all know the English channel and northern sea puts a distance between us and our neighbours that those in schengen don’t have. Even after the comparisons are done, I wonder if cultural or behavioural differences are taken into account. Probably not. I’ll not use accurate stereotypes here but we know Germans are more obedient, law abiding and government advice following than Britons. They like and respond to rules. And Swedes are more socially aware and value society and others more than Britons. Unless we see the old bill meaning business, we, well enough of a minority of us, carry on doing what we wanna do. Herd immunity will probably spread it faster in the U.K. than other European countries if that’s the way we go. All because of a diet eating flying vermin. Why can’t they just require an unnecessary gluten or lactose free diet instead? I think we can safely say that the human race is largely bat toes intolerant
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 11 Apr 20 11.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
True and if the second wave is not contagious then it's good news but if some people get bad again then immunity isnt guaranteed. Is immunity going to happen anyway? It hasn’t for flu. The probability is that Covid will mutate and come back then we’ll be back to square one until a new vaccine is developed.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 11 Apr 20 12.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
And 46% of NHS staff are not clinically qualified. How many more managers should they employ? 46% not being clinically qualified doesn’t mean there is an overzealous approach to employing managers - cleaners, receptionists, patient database administrators, supply logistics roles... all necessary for the running of any health service. Or would you like all the receptionists they employ to have PHDs? Edited by SavoyTruffle (11 Apr 2020 12.13pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 11 Apr 20 12.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
46% not being clinically qualified doesn’t mean there is an overzealous approach to employing managers - cleaners, receptionists, patient database administrators, supply logistics roles... all necessary for the running of any health service. Or would you like all the receptionists they employ to have PHDs? Edited by SavoyTruffle (11 Apr 2020 12.13pm) Yes I would. What else are they going to do? Philosophise first a living?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 11 Apr 20 12.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Many get it and die within days as well. How can blame be shifted as it was a fact. People didnt use the advice given. I did and have. Did you and yours, did danh and his,did croydon proud. If you did was it that hard to do it. You havent got C19 so clearly the advice was good advice. Freely given and freely taken. Dont forget about the 'liberty' being taken away in many releases. Maybe the government wanted to do the lockdown earlier but lawyers for you would have had a field day. No ‘many’ don’t get it and pass away in days, otherwise the mean number of days between infection and death would be much lower. Are you familiar with the term ‘average’? Ironically I have been following advice well before the government, my business sent all staff to work from home a week and a half before government mandated lockdown, I count myself lucky for that. The premier league even realised the risk to the public was significant and suspended matches while the government were saying sporting events could carry on. The biggest infringement on my liberty would be death from catching the virus from a non essential construction worker who was allowed to continue on sites that remained open at least a week after lockdown. They were just following government advice. If I catch it from someone who got it while sunbathing while they shouldn’t or a construction worker who was able to continue working after lockdown, is one worse than the other?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 11 Apr 20 12.41pm | |
---|---|
Genuinely interested to get a view from as many as possible as to when this is all done, I.e we have a vaccine, post first and second wave etc. What would you personally deem a government failure, equally a government success? I can already see a moving of the goalposts, people accusing others of politicising in the press, so think it’s important for people to outline at this stage where they think the U.K. should be landing at the end of this. For me, if we end up in top 5 deaths per capita in Europe come the end of this I think the government will have serious questions to answer, equally 10th or below per capita in Europe the government have done a good job. I will genuinely hold my hands up and say I got it wrong if the above comes to fruition. Equally a key measure I will look at come the end of this will be overall increase on death, year on year average versus countries we are on a similar economic footing to, I.e Germany, France, Spain. Edited by SavoyTruffle (11 Apr 2020 12.45pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.