You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 22 2024 8.55am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 21 of 435 < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >

  

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 22 Jul 20 5.53pm Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Naga Munchetty says the license fee is worth it. Well she would as she earns nearly £200,000 pa.

Try saying that when you are on minimum wage Naga.

[Link]

If nothing else it’s a damn fine name, it kind of reminds me how I used to feel as a kid when I’d smoked too much weed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
palace_in_frogland Flag In a broken dream 22 Jul 20 10.14pm Send a Private Message to palace_in_frogland Add palace_in_frogland as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

If nothing else it’s a damn fine name, it kind of reminds me how I used to feel as a kid when I’d smoked too much weed.

The midnight munchettys!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 23 Jul 20 2.41pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

They can't help themselves can they.

The BBC are at it again claiming that Churchill was responsible for the 1843 Bengal famine that killed 3 million people.

As usual the BBC gave a one sided view to a disaster that divides historians, distinguished people on both sides of the argument disagree.

[Link]

My points are this:

1. Why only a one sided approach why no input from those who say he was constrained by the war in Asia.

2. And more importantly why was this an item on BBC News at 10? This is not news but a debate that has been going on for 70 years.

What next tune in to the 6 o'clock news to find out if Boudica has a chance against the Romans.

Defund the BBC


 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 23 Jul 20 2.48pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

They had ‘Churchill’s Finest Hour’ with Gary Oldman playing Churchill on BBC1 a month ago. They’ll have ‘The Enigma Code’ on again when Britain and Churchill had to let German victories and British deaths continue for the long term goal of keeping it secret we’d cracked the enigma code. Maybe my relative who worked in the French Radio dept at Bletchley Park shouldn’t have bothered in case someone got hurt defending our freedom and the world from tyranny. Could’ve ended up being a better option in a few generations’ time.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 23 Jul 20 3.51pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Churchill can hardly be held responsible for a weather- induced famine.

It's like saying Johnson is personally responsible for excess covid-19 deaths.

Could have done better, but we don't seriously think it was done on purpose.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 23 Jul 20 3.52pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

They can't help themselves can they.

The BBC are at it again claiming that Churchill was responsible for the 1843 Bengal famine that killed 3 million people.

As usual the BBC gave a one sided view to a disaster that divides historians, distinguished people on both sides of the argument disagree.

[Link]

My points are this:

1. Why only a one sided approach why no input from those who say he was constrained by the war in Asia.

2. And more importantly why was this an item on BBC News at 10? This is not news but a debate that has been going on for 70 years.

What next tune in to the 6 o'clock news to find out if Boudica has a chance against the Romans.

Defund the BBC


Just refuse to pay your unfair & illegal TV tax, What can they do? NOTHING. As long as you say you dont & wont watch them in any shape or form they cant do owt. They WILL threaten, but cant enforce, IF, & its a mahoosive IF, 'enforcement officers' turn up on your doorstep, 1) You can deny them entry & 2) unplug TV's & say you aint watching them.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 23 Jul 20 4.48pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

They can't help themselves can they.

The BBC are at it again claiming that Churchill was responsible for the 1843 Bengal famine that killed 3 million people.

As usual the BBC gave a one sided view to a disaster that divides historians, distinguished people on both sides of the argument disagree.

[Link]

My points are this:

1. Why only a one sided approach why no input from those who say he was constrained by the war in Asia.

2. And more importantly why was this an item on BBC News at 10? This is not news but a debate that has been going on for 70 years.

What next tune in to the 6 o'clock news to find out if Boudica has a chance against the Romans.

Defund the BBC


I didn't find that report unfair and unbalanced and Churchill's problems were explained.

I don't follow these historians who weigh in with praise for Churchill's war effort, typical Max Hastings deflections.

In fact historians seem to always err on the British version of events, unable to face up to the truth.

The British Empire in respect of this disaster and many others, was responsible by its stripping of the colonies for home consumption.

We ransacked them, in the case of India they were worse off when we departed than they had been 200 years earlier when Clive arrived to strip them bare.

The BBC view was not one-sided, it is your education that is false, as our education system produces a totally one-sided and completely distorted view of history.

Recommended viewing:- Dr.Worsley on 'history's greatest fibs', just for starters, and included an episode on India.

And it is on BBC2........

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 23 Jul 20 5.24pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

I didn't find that report unfair and unbalanced and Churchill's problems were explained.

I don't follow these historians who weigh in with praise for Churchill's war effort, typical Max Hastings deflections.

In fact historians seem to always err on the British version of events, unable to face up to the truth.

The British Empire in respect of this disaster and many others, was responsible by its stripping of the colonies for home consumption.

We ransacked them, in the case of India they were worse off when we departed than they had been 200 years earlier when Clive arrived to strip them bare.

The BBC view was not one-sided, it is your education that is false, as our education system produces a totally one-sided and completely distorted view of history.

Recommended viewing:- Dr.Worsley on 'history's greatest fibs', just for starters, and included an episode on India.

And it is on BBC2........

So you would rather, like BLM, erase OUR ie GB's history just to appease the bbc & snowflakes?

Coz thats how THAT looks to me . . . JEEZ

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 23 Jul 20 5.41pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

I didn't find that report unfair and unbalanced and Churchill's problems were explained.

I don't follow these historians who weigh in with praise for Churchill's war effort, typical Max Hastings deflections.

In fact historians seem to always err on the British version of events, unable to face up to the truth.

The British Empire in respect of this disaster and many others, was responsible by its stripping of the colonies for home consumption.

We ransacked them, in the case of India they were worse off when we departed than they had been 200 years earlier when Clive arrived to strip them bare.

The BBC view was not one-sided, it is your education that is false, as our education system produces a totally one-sided and completely distorted view of history.

Recommended viewing:- Dr.Worsley on 'history's greatest fibs', just for starters, and included an episode on India.

And it is on BBC2........

But it's not news !

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 23 Jul 20 6.13pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

I didn't find that report unfair and unbalanced and Churchill's problems were explained.

I don't follow these historians who weigh in with praise for Churchill's war effort, typical Max Hastings deflections.

In fact historians seem to always err on the British version of events, unable to face up to the truth.

The British Empire in respect of this disaster and many others, was responsible by its stripping of the colonies for home consumption.

We ransacked them, in the case of India they were worse off when we departed than they had been 200 years earlier when Clive arrived to strip them bare.

The BBC view was not one-sided, it is your education that is false, as our education system produces a totally one-sided and completely distorted view of history.

Recommended viewing:- Dr.Worsley on 'history's greatest fibs', just for starters, and included an episode on India.

And it is on BBC2........

None of this is truth either. Nor is Worsley's stuff. You will find, for instance, there is Marxist history/ feminist history - all kinds of history. The truth is somewhere in between.
I would like, however, any kind of explanation of how India was better off, whereas India had regular famine and it was all Princely States, where many were serfs, or worse, before British rule. Some Princes were decent rulers, some not so. Some worked with the English, others with the French. It is hardly a one size fit all history, particularly in India which had, and still has, massive regional differences.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 23 Jul 20 6.17pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

But it's not news !

Which I had assumed was your point.

It also begs the further question - what is the point in promoting things like this?

I don't given a flying monkeys about any moral take on history, I couldn't care less if a little island nation was responsible for purging half the world.

What I do take offence to however is a media organisation trying to provide justification for minority groups to hold resentment against the country and culture within I live and the possible consequences of that. When did Treason stop being a crime?

#defundthebbc and all that.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 25 Jul 20 11.42am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

BBC Panorama was guilty of political bias

[Link]

And yet again the BBC has to admit it made errors. Funny if the BBC is as unbiased as they say they are why do they never makes errors the other way around e.g. pro Brexit pro right wing?

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 21 of 435 < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)