This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Dec 16 12.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That really is not true. There is a clearly defined organisation that has encouraged attacks by Muslims who's very strength is to radicalise individuals for the benefit of their cause.There are multiple examples of this which has cost hundreds of lives in Europe. You know this full well, and yet you deliberately try blur the truth to imply that there is some sort of an equal islamaphobic organisation,which is drivel. I think there is a parallel between how IS calls for attacks and how the tabloid media operates, in that they both feed into the language of justified violence (to different degrees), and can have a profound impact on certain, possibly vulnerable, people. There is definitely a difference between attacks perpetrated by IS and its members, and those 'done in its name' by the 'inspired', typically the first involves multiple, planned and calculated individuals, that are resourced towards a strategic outcome (such as the Paris attacks or the Charlie Hebdo attack), and more 'chaotic' spontaneous attacks such as Bastille Day and the shooting spree in the US. These latter attacks seem more like the result of 'psychiatric pressure' than real planned conspiracies of terror, and often have a personalised element (typically seen when people engage in spree shootings). The first, are terrorists attacks, but the latter typically are claimed after the event, more as a matter of convenience. Something like the Paris attacks was orchestrated specifically towards a political goal and backed to succeed by IS affilates, where as the 'Muslim Spree Shootings' in the US, typically is self funded, by people who at best have periphery connection to Islamist groups and no really adherence to their agenda, political aims or objectives. The media does tend to blur this difference, for convenience, whilst being rather focused when its more of a domestic issue. Especially tabloids who arguably have a large demographic market that crosses into some of those right wing factions.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Dec 16 12.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Can we clarify that, to you, if a Muslim commits a crime it's because they are a terrorist. But if a non Muslim commits a similar crime they are a Barking lone wolf Crime? What stealing a Bycicle? As usual you are blurring because you know your argument is twaddle. Repeating it over and over does not make it any less stupid.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Dec 16 1.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think there is a parallel between how IS calls for attacks and how the tabloid media operates, in that they both feed into the language of justified violence (to different degrees), and can have a profound impact on certain, possibly vulnerable, people. There is definitely a difference between attacks perpetrated by IS and its members, and those 'done in its name' by the 'inspired', typically the first involves multiple, planned and calculated individuals, that are resourced towards a strategic outcome (such as the Paris attacks or the Charlie Hebdo attack), and more 'chaotic' spontaneous attacks such as Bastille Day and the shooting spree in the US. These latter attacks seem more like the result of 'psychiatric pressure' than real planned conspiracies of terror, and often have a personalised element (typically seen when people engage in spree shootings). The first, are terrorists attacks, but the latter typically are claimed after the event, more as a matter of convenience. Something like the Paris attacks was orchestrated specifically towards a political goal and backed to succeed by IS affilates, where as the 'Muslim Spree Shootings' in the US, typically is self funded, by people who at best have periphery connection to Islamist groups and no really adherence to their agenda, political aims or objectives. The media does tend to blur this difference, for convenience, whilst being rather focused when its more of a domestic issue. Especially tabloids who arguably have a large demographic market that crosses into some of those right wing factions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Dec 16 1.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Crime? What stealing a Bycicle? As usual you are blurring because you know your argument is twaddle. Repeating it over and over does not make it any less stupid. very droll, you know exactly why I meant. I'll couch the question (you haven't really answered yet) in a different way. How is shouting 'I want to kill a Muslim' before stabbing someone not connected to Islamaphobia?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Dec 16 1.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
This is a chicken and egg argument which has no validity.
Imagine if newspapers on the costa's started printing 'Brits are c***s' type headlines. Would the ex pats feel comfortable with this and view their hosts in the same way?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Dec 16 1.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
very droll, you know exactly why I meant. I'll couch the question (you haven't really answered yet) in a different way. How is shouting 'I want to kill a Muslim' before stabbing someone not connected to Islamaphobia? I have answered you. BTW, you did not answer my previous question. Let me ask you what positives you think will come from huge over population and within that eventuality, further division created by the continuing increase in the numbers of foreign nationals and their future children to the existing population? Don't say there will be a financial one because that is laughable, not to mention unsustainable in the long term. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (16 Dec 2016 1.49pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Dec 16 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Imagine if newspapers on the costa's started printing 'Brits are c***s' type headlines. Would the ex pats feel comfortable with this and view their hosts in the same way? More chicken and egg apologist nonsense with a nice dose of exaggeration.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Dec 16 2.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I have answered you. BTW, you did not answer my previous question. Let me ask you what positives you think will come from huge over population and within that eventuality, further division created by the continuing increase in the numbers of foreign nationals and their future children to the existing population? Don't say there will be a financial one because that is laughable, not to mention unsustainable in the long term. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (16 Dec 2016 1.49pm) There will be problems for the whole planet with regards to migration with rising sea waters, displacement through war, and some places becoming uninhabitable because of climate changes. To help against divisions, let's not be so ignorant about people who just want somewhere safe to live and work to pay their way. Your Enoch Powellesque rants are great examples of catastrophising. Blimey you'd think the papers were using fear of others scaremongering to help keep the divisions and suspicion of others. In no way does it exacerbate the problem. I thought you lot were happy with Brexit, we're taking our country back type no more foreigners new Dawn we've entered. Why are you still going on about mass overpopulation. If you were Lebanese, you might have a point as their population has gone through the roof. Where are your figures / forecasts for future uncontrolled immigration (despite UK border patrols being pretty tight) or is your argument based on a hunch formed by completely dismissing one side of the argument because it doesn't fit your worldview. Edited by nickgusset (16 Dec 2016 2.52pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Dec 16 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
More chicken and egg apologist nonsense with a nice dose of exaggeration. Great use of abstract nouns rather than unpicking the argument. I'll have a go... Spouting third reichist superior race guff with no hint of reason.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Dec 16 3.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
There will be problems for the whole planet with regards to migration with rising sea waters, displacement through war, and some places becoming uninhabitable because of climate changes. Your Enoch Powellesque rants are great examples of catastrophising. Blimey you'd think the papers were using fear of others scaremongering to help keep the divisions and suspicion of others. In no way does it exacerbate the problem. I thought you lot were happy with Brexit, we're taking our country back type no more foreigners new Dawn we've entered. Why are you still going on about mass overpopulation. If you were Lebanese, you might have a point as their population has gone through the roof. Where are your figures / forecasts for future uncontrolled immigration (despite UK border patrols being pretty tight) or is your argument based on a hunch formed by completely dismissing one side of the argument because it doesn't fit your worldview. Edited by nickgusset (16 Dec 2016 2.52pm) You know the issues but you seem blind to the consequences of those issues. The current levels of migration will be tiny compared to the future. We have to have a policy to avoid the potential disaster coming out way. You talk about it like it is only a possibility, but it will happen Britain has finite resources. And your protestations about ignorance are laughable in the grand scheme. Humans are humans, that doesnt change. When we are pressured by environmental factors, we react instinctively to protect what we have. That will never change. More pressure on resources will only mean more friction. Your desire to see a hippy dippy world of love and hand holding is a fantasy, as it always has been.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Dec 16 3.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Great use of abstract nouns rather than unpicking the argument. I'll have a go... Spouting third reichist superior race guff with no hint of reason.
I'd invite you to provide an example of this by me anywhere on this site.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Dec 16 3.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I have answered you. BTW, you did not answer my previous question. Let me ask you what positives you think will come from huge over population and within that eventuality, further division created by the continuing increase in the numbers of foreign nationals and their future children to the existing population? Don't say there will be a financial one because that is laughable, not to mention unsustainable in the long term. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (16 Dec 2016 1.49pm)
Even when you look a spree shooters, you tend to find that there are patterns to who they shoot, and people they choose not to shoot. The mentally ill are capable of reasoning, its just distorted significantly from how normal reasoning works. If someone went out and stabbed people they thought were Muslims, you could probably expect to find some kind of association to anti-muslim extremism or an unhealthy obsession with issues around the media and Islam. Like that guy who thought killing someone was on the orders of the Queen of the Damned. Turns out he did have a very unhealthy fixation with that crap movie, watching it hundreds of times. He was always likely to become a threat, its just the illness tends to focus around a kind of fetish. A lot of terrorists are probably the same if they're not part of a group.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.