You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Churchill was a prick
November 23 2024 3.29am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Churchill was a prick

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 21 of 22 < 17 18 19 20 21 22 >

  

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 30 Jan 17 12.51pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Joe Bloggs

During the war (ww2) I heard lots of anti Churchill remarks..the standard comment being every time Churchill opens his mouth we get bombed.

He was a flawed individual but the right man for the job at that time.

He was never popular with the left.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Jan 17 5.49pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

He didn't personally deliver them as anybody would know.

That's kind of my point. Churchill gets the credit and plaudits, whilst the people doing the work get nothing.

You'd think the way people go on about politicians that they single handedly won the battle of bloody Britain, bully rammed Hirohito and personal split the atom over Hiroshima.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Jan 17 5.50pm

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

Good to see Donald J Trump has reinstated his bust into the Oval Office after Obama had it removed during his tenancy.

You have to be concerned when the words Trump, Bust and Oval Office are in the same sentence.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Jan 17 5.56pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

He was never popular with the left.

War time politics is an odd, no one really wants to be reminded of the war after its all over. The UK has typically seen big shifts towards left and liberal ideas following major wars, and a ground swell of optimism and social change.

Which traditionally aren't conservative or right wing in their appeal.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
davenotamonkey Flag 30 Jan 17 6.00pm Send a Private Message to davenotamonkey Add davenotamonkey as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

You have to be concerned when the words Trump, Bust and Oval Office are in the same sentence.

Close, but er.. no..

cigar.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
johnfirewall Flag 30 Jan 17 7.26pm Send a Private Message to johnfirewall Add johnfirewall as a friend

Originally posted by serial thriller

Had quite an intense with a mate of mine today about one of the great celebrated figures of this nation's political history.

I think I may have brought this up on here before but I've always held the view that Churchill is viewed as a great leader because he won. Had he lost, I believe a lot of questionable stuff the British did would have come out, but instead it's wiped under the carpet and we continue to moan about those nasty Germans with their concentration camps (an idea they knicked off us) and anti-Semitism (which was thriving in Britain in the 30s).

The clearest example of this for me is the Bengal Famine. Churchill, fearful that the Japs might invade northern India, decided rather than evacuate the natives, he would just stop sending them food and shelter (in the middle of a famine) leading to millions of deaths, some claim on a similar scale as the number of Jews killed in concentration camps. When asked about this, Churchill blamed them for 'breeding like rabbits'.

He also supported a Bill to sterilise the mentally disabled (I'm not making this up! [Link] a form of, err, eugenics.

So let's look at the evidence: a mass-murderer, who supported racial purification, but won a lot of people over because he was a good public speaker and adopted the role as figurehead of a nation.

Now who does that remind me of...

Anyone willing to defend him?

Edited by serial thriller (22 May 2013 8.18pm)

Heard those exact anti-Churchill points on the same podcast which also praised Stalin.

I'm sure they're accurate though and do put a new spin on things if you'd rather be speaking German.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 30 Jan 17 7.46pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

War time politics is an odd, no one really wants to be reminded of the war after its all over. The UK has typically seen big shifts towards left and liberal ideas following major wars, and a ground swell of optimism and social change.

Which traditionally aren't conservative or right wing in their appeal.

The idea that everyone pulled together during the war is a bit of romanticising. Churchill was not even that popular with many of the working class during the war, not just after.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 30 Jan 17 10.27pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The idea that everyone pulled together during the war is a bit of romanticising. Churchill was not even that popular with many of the working class during the war, not just after.


True that. Looting and theft went through the roof in London during the war. All them dark nights. Bloody cockneys.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Jamesey Flag Wandsworth 30 Jan 17 11.26pm Send a Private Message to Jamesey Add Jamesey as a friend

Originally posted by serial thriller

Had quite an intense with a mate of mine today about one of the great celebrated figures of this nation's political history.

I think I may have brought this up on here before but I've always held the view that Churchill is viewed as a great leader because he won. Had he lost, I believe a lot of questionable stuff the British did would have come out, but instead it's wiped under the carpet and we continue to moan about those nasty Germans with their concentration camps (an idea they knicked off us) and anti-Semitism (which was thriving in Britain in the 30s).

The clearest example of this for me is the Bengal Famine. Churchill, fearful that the Japs might invade northern India, decided rather than evacuate the natives, he would just stop sending them food and shelter (in the middle of a famine) leading to millions of deaths, some claim on a similar scale as the number of Jews killed in concentration camps. When asked about this, Churchill blamed them for 'breeding like rabbits'.

He also supported a Bill to sterilise the mentally disabled (I'm not making this up! [Link] a form of, err, eugenics.

So let's look at the evidence: a mass-murderer, who supported racial purification, but won a lot of people over because he was a good public speaker and adopted the role as figurehead of a nation.

Now who does that remind me of...

Anyone willing to defend him?

Edited by serial thriller (22 May 2013 8.18pm)

Dear me, I never even noticed that we'd killed millions of inferior races.

 


Nothing is fool-proof - fools are too ingenious

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 30 Jan 17 11.32pm

Originally posted by johnfirewall

Heard those exact anti-Churchill points on the same podcast which also praised Stalin.

I'm sure they're accurate though and do put a new spin on things if you'd rather be speaking German.

1. What podcast is that then? Do you have a link?

Why use the praised Stalin line? If you had any idea how factionalised the left is you'd know it's a trite comment that is indicitive of a lack of thiought or imagination. Do you realise how many of the left don't give a monkeys about Trotskyism, stalinism, marxism etc, they just want to see a society that gives everyone a chance and makes sure everyone is looked after. Not exactly revolutionary is it?
2. If you'd rather speak German? Did you really mean to type that? Are you really saying you think that there are people in the UK who wished we weren't victorious in the war? We have seen fascistic tendencies all across europe and arguably in the USA. We fought against facism. In fact I find it odd that certain organisations on the right use the hero soldier angle and poppy quite often. Ironic given that they symbolise remembering and saluting the heroes that helped defeat fascism.

Back to Churchill. Again no argument from me about his importance and role in defeating Germany, but nobody is perfect. It's right that his role in the Indian famine and seeming racism is not swept under the carpet.

Edited by nickgusset (30 Jan 2017 11.36pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 31 Jan 17 8.05am

Originally posted by nickgusset

1. What podcast is that then? Do you have a link?

Why use the praised Stalin line? If you had any idea how factionalised the left is you'd know it's a trite comment that is indicitive of a lack of thiought or imagination. Do you realise how many of the left don't give a monkeys about Trotskyism, stalinism, marxism etc, they just want to see a society that gives everyone a chance and makes sure everyone is looked after. Not exactly revolutionary is it?
2. If you'd rather speak German? Did you really mean to type that? Are you really saying you think that there are people in the UK who wished we weren't victorious in the war? We have seen fascistic tendencies all across europe and arguably in the USA. We fought against facism. In fact I find it odd that certain organisations on the right use the hero soldier angle and poppy quite often. Ironic given that they symbolise remembering and saluting the heroes that helped defeat fascism.

Back to Churchill. Again no argument from me about his importance and role in defeating Germany, but nobody is perfect. It's right that his role in the Indian famine and seeming racism is not swept under the carpet.

Edited by nickgusset (30 Jan 2017 11.36pm)

Attlee and Bevin were in government with Churchill at the time, how much responsibility should they be allocated? Should they have resigned?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 31 Jan 17 9.36am

Originally posted by steeleye20

He didn't personally deliver them as anybody would know.

WOOOOSHHHHHH!

Sense of humour bypass!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 21 of 22 < 17 18 19 20 21 22 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Churchill was a prick