This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Midlands Eagle 04 Jan 20 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Any MP who did anything quite that stupid would not survive for long. However taking unpopular decisions that they consider in their constituents best interests need to be explained. People tend to admire people of principle. The constituencies that had Dominic Grieve, David Gauke, Anna Soubrey and Chuka Umunna as MPs didn't appear to admire their principles as they were booted out at the first opportunity
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 04 Jan 20 12.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
John Bercow was not involved in any way, other than in trying to ensure that Parliament and not the executive took the final decisions. I anticipate that Gina Miller, as she has always done, will be working quietly away from the spotlight, helping to put together the group that will find a consensus and then provide an effective long term strategy to reverse the current stupidity. We need an effective opposition as never before and right now that has to be outside of Parliament given the determination of the Labour Party to commit suicide. I don't always agree your long posts but it is hard to disagree with any of that. Brexit puts me in mind of the last words of the defending lawyer in the excellent Making of a Murderer. The guy was so obviously stitched up and the guilty verdict so fundamentally flawed. He said I hope he did it and the jury was right. It was the only way to make sense of complete madness. Thus I hope brexiteers are right. I hope we will grow and prosper as a wealthy strong independent country with a booming trade balance and a say in the way the world is run. I sincerely hope my fears are unfounded and that I have been brainwashed by an establishment with interests vested in remaining.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 04 Jan 20 12.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Since you ask, yes. Both. Immediately after the Brexit vote my job with a US company was moved to Ireland. My concerns, however, relate more to the opportunities for my children who to date have benefited from the EU to a significant degree. I'm sorry that you lost your job I also lost mine in 2002. I too worked for a US company and they moved it to Ireland largely due to the EU tax benefits the Irish were awarded at that time. 10 years later when that tax deal ran out they moved the jobs to India the Irish Times complained about this forgetting where they pinched the jobs in the first pace. Companies will always do what they think is in their best interest if the UK offers a tax deal like the Irish had they will be flooding back.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Jan 20 12.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
This point was made in jest. However I do think we need a different political system as the current one does not appear to have the confidence of the people. I agree. I want PR with a single transferable vote. In that way all voices are heard and the majority have a stake in the decisions taken. We would doubtless have many coalitions which would require post election negotiations, haggling and compromises. What that would then ensure is an avoidance of major left and right swings in which a new Parliament spends much time and effort undoing what the previous one has done. We would steer a steady course which suits the general consensus with only minor changes of emphasis. I want MPs to be free of outside pressures on how they vote, and the threat of deselection as a weapon being used by local activists, removed. Party lists look the best way to achieve that. I want the PM to be chosen solely by MPs without any input from party activists.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
robdave2k 04 Jan 20 12.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
MP's represent all of their constituents? - in an ideal world yes, but in reality no. As an example. Diane Abbott - "white people like to play divide and rule" or sending her son to Private School, when calling out other people. I very much doubt Mrs Abbott gives a rat's arse about the people who don't agree and don't vote for her as I am equally sure that in some affluent Tory seats the incumbent couldn't give a monkey's about the views on a council estate. I hate a lot of the knuckle dragging and frankly racist overtones of some of the vocal leave camp, but nor does the "holier than though, I'm more intelligent than you and only I can see this for what it really is" of the remain side make me change my viewpoint. Not everyone who voted leave is an ill-educated, racist moron. I get the feeling what you don't like is that fact the ones making the decisions now are not necessarily in line with your own views. But when the North of England is returning Tory MP's - that is a clue that the seeds of change are present. We require an effective opposition - of that no doubt. But what I've heard in the last 4 weeks. "Boris fought the election on one issue - Brexit and people fell for it" "People are stupid to believe the Tories" and yourself above Obviously but completely beside the point. The argument is not whether people supported it or not. It is why they did and whether they had sufficient information to be able to reach an informed decision. It is whether highly complex and technical issues such as this, involving not just matters of national pride but economic, social and security issues fundamental to the futures not just of ourselves but of the coming generations, ought to be decided by a plebiscite.
Personally I didn't vote out for reasons of immigration or £350million per week to the NHS. I do believe countries such as Greece though need to be able have their own currency back, to enable them to attract Tourism back like places such as Croatia and Montenegro - both outside of the Euro. That is not going to happen unless a comparatively wealthy country that is a net contributor takes a stand. I also believe the Euro state is bloated, there is a lot of corruption and as it expands the risks become greater. There comes a point where the electorate sees politicians as just holding up the process and rightly or wrongly it is perceived as Parliament NOT listening to constituents. One thing is for sure though - they will ignore the public at their peril moving forwards. Oh and you might find you catch more flies with honey, being pompous is just more likely to make people dig in against you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Jan 20 12.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
I don't always agree your long posts but it is hard to disagree with any of that. Brexit puts me in mind of the last words of the defending lawyer in the excellent Making of a Murderer. The guy was so obviously stitched up and the guilty verdict so fundamentally flawed. He said I hope he did it and the jury was right. It was the only way to make sense of complete madness. Thus I hope brexiteers are right. I hope we will grow and prosper as a wealthy strong independent country with a booming trade balance and a say in the way the world is run. I sincerely hope my fears are unfounded and that I have been brainwashed by an establishment with interests vested in remaining. We can all hope but what we cannot do is deny what our heart and, more importantly, our brain and experience, tell us. I really don't want to ever say "I told you so" and will try to avoid doing so because crowing would be pointless when we all would have lost so much. I do though expect that I will, in time, be justified in doing so.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jan 20 12.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by robdave2k
MP's represent all of their constituents? - in an ideal world yes, but in reality no. As an example. Diane Abbott - "white people like to play divide and rule" or sending her son to Private School, when calling out other people. I very much doubt Mrs Abbott gives a rat's arse about the people who don't agree and don't vote for her as I am equally sure that in some affluent Tory seats the incumbent couldn't give a monkey's about the views on a council estate. I hate a lot of the knuckle dragging and frankly racist overtones of some of the vocal leave camp, but nor does the "holier than though, I'm more intelligent than you and only I can see this for what it really is" of the remain side make me change my viewpoint. Not everyone who voted leave is an ill-educated, racist moron. I get the feeling what you don't like is that fact the ones making the decisions now are not necessarily in line with your own views. But when the North of England is returning Tory MP's - that is a clue that the seeds of change are present. We require an effective opposition - of that no doubt. But what I've heard in the last 4 weeks. "Boris fought the election on one issue - Brexit and people fell for it" "People are stupid to believe the Tories" and yourself above Obviously but completely beside the point. The argument is not whether people supported it or not. It is why they did and whether they had sufficient information to be able to reach an informed decision. It is whether highly complex and technical issues such as this, involving not just matters of national pride but economic, social and security issues fundamental to the futures not just of ourselves but of the coming generations, ought to be decided by a plebiscite.
Personally I didn't vote out for reasons of immigration or £350million per week to the NHS. I do believe countries such as Greece though need to be able have their own currency back, to enable them to attract Tourism back like places such as Croatia and Montenegro - both outside of the Euro. That is not going to happen unless a comparatively wealthy country that is a net contributor takes a stand. I also believe the Euro state is bloated, there is a lot of corruption and as it expands the risks become greater. There comes a point where the electorate sees politicians as just holding up the process and rightly or wrongly it is perceived as Parliament NOT listening to constituents. One thing is for sure though - they will ignore the public at their peril moving forwards. Oh and you might find you catch more flies with honey, being pompous is just more likely to make people dig in against you. Excellent post.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Jan 20 1.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by robdave2k
MP's represent all of their constituents? - in an ideal world yes, but in reality no. As an example. Diane Abbott - "white people like to play divide and rule" or sending her son to Private School, when calling out other people. I very much doubt Mrs Abbott gives a rat's arse about the people who don't agree and don't vote for her as I am equally sure that in some affluent Tory seats the incumbent couldn't give a monkey's about the views on a council estate. I have no more time for Diane Abbott than you. There will always be bad apples in any big barrel. I hate a lot of the knuckle dragging and frankly racist overtones of some of the vocal leave camp, but nor does the "holier than though, I'm more intelligent than you and only I can see this for what it really is" of the remain side make me change my viewpoint. Not everyone who voted leave is an ill-educated, racist moron. I have always accepted that there are good and bad people on both sides of the argument. My primary objection is that no-one, whichever stance they took, was in a position to truly understand the complexity. That's not our fault. We aren't experts. I get the feeling what you don't like is that fact the ones making the decisions now are not necessarily in line with your own views. But when the North of England is returning Tory MP's - that is a clue that the seeds of change are present. I disagree with the thinking of those now in charge. The reason the North has swung to the Tories has much more to do with the demise of Labour than anything to do with the Tories. That and the misinformation constantly spoon fed to them by the Sun, Mail and Express. We require an effective opposition - of that no doubt. But what I've heard in the last 4 weeks. "Boris fought the election on one issue - Brexit and people fell for it" "People are stupid to believe the Tories" and yourself above Obviously but completely beside the point. The argument is not whether people supported it or not. It is why they did and whether they had sufficient information to be able to reach an informed decision. It is whether highly complex and technical issues such as this, involving not just matters of national pride but economic, social and security issues fundamental to the futures not just of ourselves but of the coming generations, ought to be decided by a plebiscite.
It has nothing to do with people being too stupid to decide. People who aren't brain surgeons are not stupid as a consequence.It is about allowing those who have the time and access to information, who have been chosen by us to represent us, to take these complex decisions on our behalf. As a Parliament our MPs were against Brexit. That ought to tell us something. Personally I didn't vote out for reasons of immigration or £350million per week to the NHS. I do believe countries such as Greece though need to be able have their own currency back, to enable them to attract Tourism back like places such as Croatia and Montenegro - both outside of the Euro. That is not going to happen unless a comparatively wealthy country that is a net contributor takes a stand. I respect that view, even though I disagree with it as I think there is a better way to achieve the desired outcome. I also believe the Euro state is bloated, there is a lot of corruption and as it expands the risks become greater. I have always accepted that reform is needed. There comes a point where the electorate sees politicians as just holding up the process and rightly or wrongly it is perceived as Parliament NOT listening to constituents. Wrongly in my view which suggests that more explanation and involvement is needed. One thing is for sure though - they will ignore the public at their peril moving forwards. Our future is always in our own hands. Oh and you might find you catch more flies with honey, being pompous is just more likely to make people dig in against you. I have been accused of being pompous many times and I am sorry if I come over that way. It isn't intentional. I see myself as passionate and determined to express myself forcibly.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 04 Jan 20 5.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
I don't always agree your long posts but it is hard to disagree with any of that. Brexit puts me in mind of the last words of the defending lawyer in the excellent Making of a Murderer. The guy was so obviously stitched up and the guilty verdict so fundamentally flawed. He said I hope he did it and the jury was right. It was the only way to make sense of complete madness. Thus I hope brexiteers are right. I hope we will grow and prosper as a wealthy strong independent country with a booming trade balance and a say in the way the world is run. I sincerely hope my fears are unfounded and that I have been brainwashed by an establishment with interests vested in remaining. Unfortunately a comparison with our prosperity in or out cannot be made.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 04 Jan 20 5.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Unfortunately a comparison with our prosperity in or out cannot be made. Increased federalism post Maastricht was enough for me.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 04 Jan 20 6.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I'm sorry that you lost your job I also lost mine in 2002. I too worked for a US company and they moved it to Ireland largely due to the EU tax benefits the Irish were awarded at that time. 10 years later when that tax deal ran out they moved the jobs to India the Irish Times complained about this forgetting where they pinched the jobs in the first pace. Companies will always do what they think is in their best interest if the UK offers a tax deal like the Irish had they will be flooding back. No. They moved the office to stay within the EU. They chose Ireland for language and tax reasons but wouldn’t have stayed in the uk. We have lost our bridgehead status for the EU
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 04 Jan 20 6.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I'm sorry that you lost your job I also lost mine in 2002. I too worked for a US company and they moved it to Ireland largely due to the EU tax benefits the Irish were awarded at that time. 10 years later when that tax deal ran out they moved the jobs to India the Irish Times complained about this forgetting where they pinched the jobs in the first pace. Companies will always do what they think is in their best interest if the UK offers a tax deal like the Irish had they will be flooding back. Dublin is great for the craic, but I really wouldn't want to live there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.