This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
inflikted 11 Mar 23 3.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Do you need a hug? Nah just the tories to f*** off out of the government and out of the BBC. Snowflakes who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism.
Milkshakes Against Fascism |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
inflikted 11 Mar 23 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible. If your children are that young and impressionable and you're letting them on twitter unsupervised, that's just bad parenting Edited by inflikted (11 Mar 2023 3.09pm)
Milkshakes Against Fascism |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 11 Mar 23 3.10pm | |
---|---|
I would imagine the first round of people getting fired will be the middle aged guys on the most money, once that is done the bbc can focus on getting rid of those remaining that seem to be causing the most trouble - the time gap will give those that don't earn so much to consider what they really want, a job or short lived publicity for biting the hand that feeds them. Originally posted by Spiderman
I think this is what they will do. Perhaps it was their intention all along and were just waiting for an excuse
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fishbone London 11 Mar 23 3.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
I would imagine the first round of people getting fired will be the middle aged guys on the most money, once that is done the bbc can focus on getting rid of those remaining that seem to be causing the most trouble - the time gap will give those that don't earn so much to consider what they really want, a job or short lived publicity for biting the hand that feeds them.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fishbone London 11 Mar 23 3.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by inflikted
Nah just the tories to f*** off out of the government and out of the BBC. Snowflakes who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism.[/quote Well said!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 23 3.33pm | |
---|---|
Surprised you use the Guardian as a source! I thought they were a bigger devil than even the BBC. So you choose what is most accurate. An article in the Guardian in November 21 or verbatim statements directly from the BBC in June 22. He wasn't sacked before the Ashes. He wasn't included in the team and that's what the BBC said at the time. This though is all whataboutery. What's your reaction to my other comments?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fishbone London 11 Mar 23 3.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Surprised you use the Guardian as a source! I thought they were a bigger devil than even the BBC. So you choose what is most accurate. An article in the Guardian in November 21 or verbatim statements directly from the BBC in June 22. He wasn't sacked before the Ashes. He wasn't included in the team and that's what the BBC said at the time. This though is all whataboutery. What's your reaction to my other comments? Yeah! He should have read the sun or the daily mail innit!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 23 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Aside from anything else, it is absolute insanity when a group of celebrities is promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country, especially when an ever growing number are arriving here illegally. This is a country with finite resources and space, which has an existing population that should be the primary concern of any government. His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible. You have a history of posting inane comments, but this one takes you to a new low. This has nothing at all to do with any "group of celebrities promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country". Firstly because no-one actually believes that. More importantly, even they did, it's not about that. This is about whether BBC employees, or contractors, have the right to express their opinions in their own time, on matters outside their area of responsibility. Whether you, I, Suella Braverman, Nigel Farage or Uncle Tom Cobley agree with their sentiments is irrelevant. One day someone will say things we do agree with and we cannot be selective. It's either OK, or it isn't. Your last sentence is truly mind-blowing. Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 11 Mar 23 4.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Garnett was a caricature written by a leftie. The other 3 are no more toxic than Linekar. But more respectful of democracy than Marxist Gary.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 11 Mar 23 4.21pm | |
---|---|
The solution to all this is for the BBC to become a self-funding organisation not subject to any sort of 'charter'. It would then be free to tell its presenters what they can and can't do and the presenters could choose whether to work for them or not. Such a BBC should also rebrand and change its name.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
inflikted 11 Mar 23 4.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
Garnett was a caricature written by a leftie. The other 3 are no more toxic than Linekar. But more respectful of democracy than Marxist Gary. Yaxley-Lennon is a bona fide fascist. Lineker is a moderate Liberal at best.
Milkshakes Against Fascism |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 11 Mar 23 4.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You have a history of posting inane comments, but this one takes you to a new low. This has nothing at all to do with any "group of celebrities promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country". Firstly because no-one actually believes that. More importantly, even they did, it's not about that. This is about whether BBC employees, or contractors, have the right to express their opinions in their own time, on matters outside their area of responsibility. Whether you, I, Suella Braverman, Nigel Farage or Uncle Tom Cobley agree with their sentiments is irrelevant. One day someone will say things we do agree with and we cannot be selective. It's either OK, or it isn't. Your last sentence is truly mind-blowing. Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett? What are your objections to unlimited immigration?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.