This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Jun 16 10.31pm | |
---|---|
made me chuckle. Attachment: kraftwerk.jpg (27.13Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 21 Jun 16 10.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
All I can say is that you and the new EUed version of Wisbech deserve each other. Wisbech was always a bit of an exception, although it has now been several years since I was there. We should never vote on how things affect us personally, especially on this issue. How is the Sportsman?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rubin 21 Jun 16 10.51pm | |
---|---|
Questionable:
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 21 Jun 16 10.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Wisbech was always a bit of an exception, although it has now been several years since I was there. We should never vote on how things affect us personally, especially on this issue. A lot on the Brexit side are doing exactly that. For a lot of us the negatives of immigration will never affect us but it does for many now/ And more than likely it will affect future generations more and more, although possibly not our own offspring as much, but I wouldn't count on that one. 3 million people in net migration every 10 years alone before birth and death rates. And on the economic issue it is very possible that the country is being held back because of EU membership. Again, an area that may not affect us personally in the slightest but certainly affects others now. Edited by Rudi Hedman (21 Jun 2016 10.59pm)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 21 Jun 16 10.58pm | |
---|---|
Her name used to be Gisela Gschaider, it is now Stuart. She has a British husband, British citizenship for years, British children, she respects the English and British way of life and from what we can see, intends to stay here indefinitely and carry on serving as an MP. Why shouldn't she have an opinion? Wasn't not being allowed an opinion as an MP that led to that deranged mess to end someone's life? She's a Brtish MP FFS, not Barack Obama or Angela Merkel trying to save her cushy German export project.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Jun 16 12.13am | |
---|---|
This sums up a dilemma many have... Illustrates why I'm finding it hard to choose.
JUNE 21ST, 2016 Kerry-anne Mendoza KERRY-ANNE MENDOZA Britain is hurtling ever closer to the day of the Brexit vote. In a very short while, the public will cast their ballots to remain in the EU, or leave. But however they vote, one thing is sure: the EU Referendum is one of the cruellest tricks ever played on the British public. The Referendum is not about our fate in the EU, or controlling our borders, or protecting our sovereignty as a nation, or enhancing our democracy. It is, as is almost everything in modern politics, about wealth and power. If the EU Referendum was a genuine debate about the future of our nation, it would look very different. First, and most importantly, there would be a general election set shortly afterwards. There may even be leadership elections set for the major political parties too. This would mean that voters could not only choose whether to leave or remain in the EU, but how they would leave or remain in the EU. Each party (and indeed factions within each) would have set out a clear vision on whether to leave or remain in the EU, and what each of those choices would look like under their leadership. Referendum voters would know that after the vote, they could then elect to government the people they felt most confident could deliver that future.
But it isn’t just the left who are being shafted in this vote. At the other end of the spectrum, the right are being done over too. Those who wish to see Britain cut immigration dramatically are going to be bitterly disappointed in the event of a Brexit vote. The economics embraced by David Cameron and the conservatives doesn’t permit protectionism – or ‘looking after our own’. This is why they do nothing for working class Britons losing jobs because their bosses choose to exploit immigrant labour. This is why they do nothing when companies ship British jobs overseas to exploit workers in far away countries. They are not patriots, or nationalists. They think as part of a trans-national capitalist class. The bottom line for them is the profit and loss accounts of themselves and their peers, not the personal aspirations of 31 million working people in Britain, or the near 2 million unemployed. The right can rest assured that if Britain leaves the EU and the Conservatives stay in power – there will be every bit as much, if not more, exploitation of immigrant and overseas labour, and all the losses of jobs, wages and working conditions that go along with it. All things considered, we are forced to conclude that the only groups to win from this EU Referendum are the very same groups that have won for the last two decades: those who know the price of everything and the value of nothing. Those who see the NHS not as the foundation rock of our public health, but as a cash cow, ripe for milking. Those who see housing not as the basis for family and community life, but as a market in which to speculate and accumulate. Those who see education not as a ladder leading people up to a better place in the world, but as a means of turning our young people into debtors with hefty student loans which shackle them for life. Those who see immigration as a way of lowering working conditions and wages to the lowest common denominator. Those who see trade deals as another way of doing the same. The rest of us – UKIP voters, one nation Conservatives, traditional or social conservatives, socialists or social democrats, radical lefties, greens – all of us are being screwed by this seemingly untouchable, indifferent political and media class. While we might disagree on the solutions, we are all craving remarkably similar things at the heart of it: community, safety, prosperity, good neighbourliness and civility, respect, integrity in our institutions, individual freedom. And none of us are going to get these things through this EU Referendum. Instead, it is likely that whichever way we vote, they will remain firmly out of our reach until we take far bolder steps at the ballot box come general election time. This whole sham of a Referendum is a giant missed opportunity to reshape our nation in real and fundamental ways. Proving once again, that if we want a genuine transformation of this country, we’re going to have to do it ourselves.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 22 Jun 16 12.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
This sums up a dilemma many have... Illustrates why I'm finding it hard to choose.
JUNE 21ST, 2016 Kerry-anne Mendoza KERRY-ANNE MENDOZA Britain is hurtling ever closer to the day of the Brexit vote. In a very short while, the public will cast their ballots to remain in the EU, or leave. But however they vote, one thing is sure: the EU Referendum is one of the cruellest tricks ever played on the British public. The Referendum is not about our fate in the EU, or controlling our borders, or protecting our sovereignty as a nation, or enhancing our democracy. It is, as is almost everything in modern politics, about wealth and power. If the EU Referendum was a genuine debate about the future of our nation, it would look very different. First, and most importantly, there would be a general election set shortly afterwards. There may even be leadership elections set for the major political parties too. This would mean that voters could not only choose whether to leave or remain in the EU, but how they would leave or remain in the EU. Each party (and indeed factions within each) would have set out a clear vision on whether to leave or remain in the EU, and what each of those choices would look like under their leadership. Referendum voters would know that after the vote, they could then elect to government the people they felt most confident could deliver that future.
But it isn’t just the left who are being shafted in this vote. At the other end of the spectrum, the right are being done over too. Those who wish to see Britain cut immigration dramatically are going to be bitterly disappointed in the event of a Brexit vote. The economics embraced by David Cameron and the conservatives doesn’t permit protectionism – or ‘looking after our own’. This is why they do nothing for working class Britons losing jobs because their bosses choose to exploit immigrant labour. This is why they do nothing when companies ship British jobs overseas to exploit workers in far away countries. They are not patriots, or nationalists. They think as part of a trans-national capitalist class. The bottom line for them is the profit and loss accounts of themselves and their peers, not the personal aspirations of 31 million working people in Britain, or the near 2 million unemployed. The right can rest assured that if Britain leaves the EU and the Conservatives stay in power – there will be every bit as much, if not more, exploitation of immigrant and overseas labour, and all the losses of jobs, wages and working conditions that go along with it. All things considered, we are forced to conclude that the only groups to win from this EU Referendum are the very same groups that have won for the last two decades: those who know the price of everything and the value of nothing. Those who see the NHS not as the foundation rock of our public health, but as a cash cow, ripe for milking. Those who see housing not as the basis for family and community life, but as a market in which to speculate and accumulate. Those who see education not as a ladder leading people up to a better place in the world, but as a means of turning our young people into debtors with hefty student loans which shackle them for life. Those who see immigration as a way of lowering working conditions and wages to the lowest common denominator. Those who see trade deals as another way of doing the same. The rest of us – UKIP voters, one nation Conservatives, traditional or social conservatives, socialists or social democrats, radical lefties, greens – all of us are being screwed by this seemingly untouchable, indifferent political and media class. While we might disagree on the solutions, we are all craving remarkably similar things at the heart of it: community, safety, prosperity, good neighbourliness and civility, respect, integrity in our institutions, individual freedom. And none of us are going to get these things through this EU Referendum. Instead, it is likely that whichever way we vote, they will remain firmly out of our reach until we take far bolder steps at the ballot box come general election time. This whole sham of a Referendum is a giant missed opportunity to reshape our nation in real and fundamental ways. Proving once again, that if we want a genuine transformation of this country, we’re going to have to do it ourselves. You've been on this thread for 17 Hours, I would of thought you had an inkling to which way your going to vote!!
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Jun 16 8.49am | |
---|---|
My biggest problem with voting remain is the fact that we won't have 'permission' to renationalise railways etc. That's why I found it curious that Corbyn is a remainer. I will join the debate again later. Just about to start a new job! Edited by nickgusset (22 Jun 2016 8.49am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rubin 22 Jun 16 9.07am | |
---|---|
Don't forget TTIP. They were saying on the radio yesterday that when it comes to TTIP and the NHS, the NHS got ring fenced from being seen as 'monopoly' which would have meant that businesses could have sued the UK government in secret courts if they felt they'd been treated unfairly when it came to contracts. This exclusion was later withdrawn. As an example, if the UK government were to bring in a law limiting the amount of sugar allowed in soft drinks, it would mean that a company such as Coca Cola could sue for loss of profits. On the food standards that TTIP would impose on Europe: [Link] Edited by Rubin (22 Jun 2016 9.07am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 22 Jun 16 9.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
made me chuckle. That was a welcome breather in the heated debate!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 22 Jun 16 9.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
That was a welcome breather in the heated debate! Also, was this the worst Kraftwerk gig ever because Florian Schneider clearly isn't there and there is a distinct lack of depth to the synths?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 22 Jun 16 9.23am | |
---|---|
Frankly, I'm done on this debate. I see a lot off people quibbling over the details of this and that but not many thinking about the wider long term questions. I can only see our importance and influence in Europe and the World being diminished by remaining. As more people join the EU as I'm sure they will, our vote on anything will be less influential and more and more people will be able to come here to compete for jobs, housing etc. VOTE LEAVE.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.