This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
steeleye20 Croydon 18 Sep 23 8.59pm | |
---|---|
We haven't heard from CR himself, but that was a fantastic tackle, so well done Chris.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pierre Purley 18 Sep 23 9.19pm | |
---|---|
It wasn't the marginal penalty decision or the stupid VAR fiasco that cost us the game on Saturday. Then Palace could have possibly managed and 'weathered' the Villa onslaught better in the latter stages of the game. We don't have the same strength in depth in the squad as a lot of Premiership teams, but we should have used more of them on Saturday.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 18 Sep 23 9.28pm | |
---|---|
I wonder if the majority of fans would like to do away with VAR.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 19 Sep 23 5.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I wonder if the majority of fans would like to do away with VAR. Its is even worse for the lino , he actually has little to do these days but tie his laces and confirm who's throw it is . Reminds me of when I used to 'run the line ' on a Sunday ,The ref would say just follow my lead , dont flag for anything as it just confuses them . lol
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
taylors lovechild 19 Sep 23 8.09am | |
---|---|
At half-time I think most of us would agree Villa were the better team. As has been said, while perhaps a bit fortunate to get in front once we were we had several opportunities to kill the game off so the penalty incident shouldn't have mattered. I know it sounds harsh given his goal tally but Edouard probably should have more goals and assists as his decision making and final pass have been poor this season, and it was the same on Saturday.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 19 Sep 23 9.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I wonder if the majority of fans would like to do away with VAR. Taking that further, I question whether the majority of Managers and players would also like to do away with it. Frustrating though incorrect refereeing decisions used to be, ultimately they could be put down to human error and only getting one brief moment to make a decision. VAR should have largely eliminated those types of errors but it hasn't. Why ? As I posted earlier, decisions are still subjective and the same people are making the same mistakes even with the available technology. Rule changes and their interpretations have not helped either. I thought the Forest ' handball ' last night captured all that is currently wrong in that one incident. VAR is sucking the life out of the game. It's time that the paying public and the playing community had an opportunity to discard it if that's what is wanted. Not have it imposed by the authorities that continue to spoil the game in so many ways.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Canterbury Palace Whitstable 19 Sep 23 9.11am | |
---|---|
I couldn't watch on Saturday but sounds like Richards was immense. With Guehi, Andersen, Richards and Holding there aren't many sides in the division with better CB options. With Edoaurd and Mateta suddenly coming good too, if we could sign a RB and LW in January we'd be in pretty good shape.
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CrazyBadger Ware 19 Sep 23 10.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Taking that further, I question whether the majority of Managers and players would also like to do away with it. Frustrating though incorrect refereeing decisions used to be, ultimately they could be put down to human error and only getting one brief moment to make a decision. VAR should have largely eliminated those types of errors but it hasn't. Why ? As I posted earlier, decisions are still subjective and the same people are making the same mistakes even with the available technology. Rule changes and their interpretations have not helped either. I thought the Forest ' handball ' last night captured all that is currently wrong in that one incident. VAR is sucking the life out of the game. It's time that the paying public and the playing community had an opportunity to discard it if that's what is wanted. Not have it imposed by the authorities that continue to spoil the game in so many ways. It's pretty widely accepted that VAR has not been as successful as it was lauded to be before we had it. It was supposed to be a simple solution to correct the human officiating errors occurring every game. It's turned into a beast that doesn't even address the issue it was brought in for, and become clear that these decisions aren't as straight forward as first thought. There's always going to be discussions about what is something (i.e. a penalty) and what isn't. Those discussions shouldn't be about VAR. There is a future for it, but not in this incarnation. I'm of the view that it needs to be removed, reassessed and then reimplemented once a more accurate solution is devised.
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 19 Sep 23 11.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
It's pretty widely accepted that VAR has not been as successful as it was lauded to be before we had it. It was supposed to be a simple solution to correct the human officiating errors occurring every game. It's turned into a beast that doesn't even address the issue it was brought in for, and become clear that these decisions aren't as straight forward as first thought. There's always going to be discussions about what is something (i.e. a penalty) and what isn't. Those discussions shouldn't be about VAR. There is a future for it, but not in this incarnation. I'm of the view that it needs to be removed, reassessed and then reimplemented once a more accurate solution is devised.
No. What needs to happen is the removal of politics from decisions. The referee's position as the final decider should be removed and a panel of VAR officials should have the final say. The ref should be there to implement decisions on the pitch, but not govern them. You have subordinate VAR people who are afraid to question senior officials, and you have refs going against common sense, and taking 5 minutes to do so, even when VAR has asked them to review their original decisions, like on Saturday at Villa. Also, VAR needs to be used more often. For corners and throw in decisions which could be re watched in seconds. Other sports have more sensible rules, but sadly football seems to be controlled by idiots.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
palace chick South Croydon 19 Sep 23 11.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. What needs to happen is the removal of politics from decisions. The referee's position as the final decider should be removed and a panel of VAR officials should have the final say. The ref should be there to implement decisions on the pitch, but not govern them. You have subordinate VAR people who are afraid to question senior officials, and you have refs going against common sense, and taking 5 minutes to do so, even when VAR has asked them to review their original decisions, like on Saturday at Villa. Also, VAR needs to be used more often. For corners and throw in decisions which could be re watched in seconds. Other sports have more sensible rules, but sadly football seems to be controlled by idiots.
Agreed! And as you say corners and throw ins need to be immediate decisions. Not there for that just yet. But we are for decisions like Saturdays penalty. Don’t ask the ref to look at it. Tell him, it’s a penalty or not a penalty.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CrazyBadger Ware 19 Sep 23 11.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. What needs to happen is the removal of politics from decisions. The referee's position as the final decider should be removed and a panel of VAR officials should have the final say. The ref should be there to implement decisions on the pitch, but not govern them. You have subordinate VAR people who are afraid to question senior officials, and you have refs going against common sense, and taking 5 minutes to do so, even when VAR has asked them to review their original decisions, like on Saturday at Villa. Also, VAR needs to be used more often. For corners and throw in decisions which could be re watched in seconds. Other sports have more sensible rules, but sadly football seems to be controlled by idiots.
I agree, but it's in a state now that it is becoming too damaging to the game. Remove it and correct it. If that's by creating new tech to help, or removing/re-educating the idiots that control it, whichever works. Many times it's been suggested that just because VAR have said the ref should review their decision, doesn't mean the ref should change their decision - In fact people were saying that there was too much pressure for the ref to accept the decision of the VAR team. Which is it - Go blindly with VAR or allow the Ref some level of control?
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 19 Sep 23 12.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. What needs to happen is the removal of politics from decisions. The referee's position as the final decider should be removed and a panel of VAR officials should have the final say. The ref should be there to implement decisions on the pitch, but not govern them. You have subordinate VAR people who are afraid to question senior officials, and you have refs going against common sense, and taking 5 minutes to do so, even when VAR has asked them to review their original decisions, like on Saturday at Villa. Also, VAR needs to be used more often. For corners and throw in decisions which could be re watched in seconds. Other sports have more sensible rules, but sadly football seems to be controlled by idiots.
I absolutely hate the phrase ‘the referee is sticking with…’. The fact we now have all these amendments, bonkers rules, a referee and whole team watching cameras, who still frequently get decisions wrong, just shows how little intelligence there is in the game. You either have to conclude that they have no idea what constitutes a foul or otherwise, they’re unable to use the technology available or they’re cheating/bias in some way. Perhaps it’s all three. Should be a real one in x amount of times circumstance that the correct decision is hard to reach. Not numerous times every weekend and frequently wrong. You’ve got f-ing cameras and an abundance of technology available, at the very least you have to understand the rules/game and should be able to make decisions within seconds. Still miles off it. Rather than mitigate any abuse referees and officials get it’s just added further fuel to the fire in evidencing the grievances that are and always have been there.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.